Literature DB >> 27919540

Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.

Jaclynn L Powell1, Jeffrey R Hawley2, Adele M Lipari2, Vedat O Yildiz3, B Selnur Erdal2, Selin Carkaci2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to digital screening mammography (DM) has been shown to decrease recall rates and improve cancer detection rates, but there is a lack of data regarding the impact of DBT on rates of short-term follow-up. We assessed possible changes in performance measures with the introduction of DBT at our facility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our observational study, databases were used to compare rates of recall, short-term follow-up, biopsy, and cancer detection between women undergoing DM without (n = 10,477) and women undergoing DM with (n = 2304) the addition of DBT. Regression analysis was performed to determine associations with patient age, breast density, and availability of comparison examinations.
RESULTS: The addition of DBT resulted in significantly lower recall rates (16%-14%, P = .017), higher rates of biopsy (12.7%-19.1%, P < .01), and increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ, with a difference of 2.3 cases per 1000 screens (P = .044). A 33% increase in cancer detection rates was observed with DBT, which did not reach statistical significance. Short-term follow-up of probably benign findings was 80% higher in the DBT group (odds ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval = 1.38-2.36, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we are the first to study the impact of DBT on rates of short-term follow-up, and observed an 80% increase over the DM group. Further research is needed to determine the malignancy rate of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 lesions detected with DBT, and establish appropriate follow-up to maximize cancer detection while minimizing expense and patient anxiety.
Copyright © 2017 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIRADS 3; DBT; DCIS; short-term follow-up; tomosynthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919540     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  5 in total

1.  BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Anne Marie McCarthy; Susan P Weinstein; Mitchell D Schnall; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The cost-effectiveness of adding tomosynthesis to mammography-based breast cancer screening: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Sonya Cressman; Colin Mar; Janette Sam; Lisa Kan; Caroline Lohrisch; John J Spinelli
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 3.  The role of digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: a manufacturer- and metrics-specific analysis.

Authors:  A Hadjipanteli; M Kontos; A Constantinidou
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Accuracy and Effectiveness of Mammography versus Mammography and Tomosynthesis for Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rosa Giampietro; Marcos Vinicius Gama Cabral; Silvana Andrea Molina Lima; Silke Anna Theresa Weber; Vania Dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Aijia Wang; Laila Cochon; Catherine Giess; Sonali Desai; Sunil Eappen; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 5.532

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.