Literature DB >> 27919373

Improving the effectiveness of drug safety alerts to increase adherence to the guideline for gastrointestinal prophylaxis.

Soufiane Lilih1, Marieke Pereboom2, Ruud T M van der Hoeven2, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse3, Matthijs L Becker4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gastrointestinal bleedings are the most frequently occurring reason for medication-related hospital admissions, which are potentially preventable. We implemented a clinical decision support system that recommends to prescribe gastrointestinal prophylaxis in patients with an increased risk according to the Dutch guideline. Our primary objective was to determine whether the implementation resulted in improved compliance with this guideline for gastrointestinal prophylaxis. A secondary objective was to determine whether implementation resulted in a reduction of the number of drug safety alerts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This intervention study was performed at the Spaarne Gasthuis, a teaching hospital, using Epic as hospital information system. We selected prescriptions with an indication for gastrointestinal prophylaxis according to the guideline, in the three months before and after implementation of the clinical decision support in November 2014. We analyzed whether gastrointestinal prophylaxis was prescribed more frequently after implementation using the Pearson's Chi-square test and the change in the number of drug safety alerts.
RESULTS: Before implementation in 84.0% of the included 2064 prescriptions gastrointestinal prophylaxis was co-prescribed. After implementation this percentage increased to 94.5% of the 2269 prescriptions (p<0.001). The number of drug safety alerts decreased by 78.2% from 980 to 217 alerts.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of a clinical decision support system for gastrointestinal prophylaxis improved adherence to the Dutch guideline. This was most likely due to a reduction in the number of irrelevant drug safety alerts. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical; Decision support systems; Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919373     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  3 in total

Review 1.  Contributions from the 2016 Literature on Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  V Koutkias; J Bouaud
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 2.  Impact of electronic health records on predefined safety outcomes in patients admitted to hospital: a scoping review.

Authors:  Christian Peter Subbe; Genevieve Tellier; Paul Barach
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.

Authors:  Sanne Peters; Krithika Sukumar; Sophie Blanchard; Akilesh Ramasamy; Jennifer Malinowski; Pamela Ginex; Emily Senerth; Marleen Corremans; Zachary Munn; Tamara Kredo; Lucia Prieto Remon; Etienne Ngeh; Lisa Kalman; Samia Alhabib; Yasser Sami Amer; Anna Gagliardi
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 7.960

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.