| Literature DB >> 27919228 |
Fengjiao Hu1, Qiaoxing Wu1, Shuang Song1, Ruiping She2, Yue Zhao1, Yifei Yang1, Meikun Zhang3, Fang Du1, Majid Hussain Soomro1, Ruihan Shi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin is a rich source of biological peptides. As a byproduct and even wastewater of poultry-slaughtering facilities, chicken blood is one of the most abundant source of hemoglobin.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; Antimicrobial peptides; Bactericidal activity; Hemoglobin; Hydrolysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27919228 PMCID: PMC5139128 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0904-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Preparation of CHAP. a Sephadex G-100 gelatin separation of the extract from chicken blood. b Antibacterial activity detection of elution of Sephadex G-100 gelatin by agarose diffusion assay against Escherichia coli ATCC25922. c Tricine–SDS-PAGE of the interested elution and the band was around 3.3 KDa (arrow)
Antibacterial activity and bactericidal activity of Chicken hemoglobin fragment peptides
| Strains | D (mm) | MIC (μg mL−1) | IR (%) | MBC (μg mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-negative bacteria | ||||
|
| 24.5 | 6.25 | 83.00 | 80 |
|
| 18 | 12.5 | 66.53 | 80 |
|
| 20 | 6.25 | 55.24 | 80 |
|
| 18 | 6.25 | 47.83 | 80 |
|
| 13 | 3.13 | 52.05 | >160 |
|
| 15 | 3.13 | 52.94 | 80 |
|
| 12 | 3.13 | 63.63 | 80 |
|
| 33.5 | 6.25 | 62.73 | 80 |
|
| 19 | 1.56 | 85.56 | 5 |
|
| 11 | 6.25 | 89.92 | 80 |
| Gram-positive bacteria | ||||
|
| 27 | 3.13 | 50.00 | >160 |
|
| 21 | 3.13 | 94.26 | 5 |
|
| 14.5 | 1.56 | 73.36 | 40 |
|
| 13.5 | 3.13 | 73.36 | 20 |
|
| 15.5 | 6.25 | 88.6 | >160 |
|
| 15.5 | 6.25 | 56.93 | >160 |
|
| 22 | 1.56 | 91.10 | >160 |
|
| 13.5 | 6.25 | 35.00 | >160 |
|
| 29 | 3.13 | 55.00 | >160 |
MR multidrug resistance (in bold), D diameter of inhibition zone, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, IR inhibitory rate in 30 min, MBC minimal bactericidal concentration
Fig. 2a-b Time-dependent inhibitory curves of bacteria treated with CHAP and the bacteria treated with the solvent as control. a Gram-negative bacteria. b Gram-positive bacteria. c-d Time-dependent growth inhibitory rate curves of bacteria treated with CHAP and the bacteria treated with the solvent as control. c Gram-positive bacteria. d Gram-positive bacteria. e-f Time dependent bactericidal curves of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 treated with CHAP and the bacteria treated with the solvent as control. e At early exponential phase. f At late exponential phase
Fig. 3a Bacteriolysis analysis. Bacteria in stationary phase treated with CHAP resulted in lysis with the solvent as control. b The inhibitory effect of CHAP on bacterial biofilm for 24 h and 72 h. c-d The effect of CHAP on NaCl permeability of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213
Fig. 4The morphology of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 were investigated by scanning electron microscopy. a-b The control group. c-d The Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 treated with CHAP. Viscous substances were adhering to almost all CHAP treated cells, which got large number of bacteria together (arrowheads); Some bacteria showed variable length, rough cell surfaces or globular protrusions on their surfaces, and even appeared to collapse (arrows)
Fig. 5The morphology of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 were investigated by transmission electron microscopy. a-b The control group. c-d The Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 treated with CHAP. Most of the bacteria were translucent and pores were evident on walls especially at the two terminals of each cell (arrowheads). There was some intracellular substance released from many bacteria (arrows).
Fig. 6The stability of CHAP. a The stability of the CHAP in different temperatures. b The stability of the CHAP in chicken and rabbit plasma