| Literature DB >> 27919226 |
Yosuke Takeda1, Hiroshi Oue2, Shinsuke Okada1, Akira Kawano1, Katsunori Koretake1, Makoto Michikawa3, Yasumasa Akagawa1, Kazuhiro Tsuga1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is known that tooth loss is known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and soft diet feeding induces memory impairment. Recent studies have shown that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is associated with tooth loss or soft diet in young animal model, and that BDNF expression is decreased in patients with Alzheimer's disease. However, single or combined effect of tooth loss and/or soft diet on brain function has not fully understood. Here we examined the effect of molar loss and powder diet on memory ability and the expression of BDNF mRNA in the hippocampus of adult C57BL/6J mice. Twenty eight-weeks-old C57BL/6J mice were divided into intact molar group and extracted molar group. They were randomly divided into the I/S group (Intact upper molar teeth/Solid diet feeding), the E/S group (Extracted upper molar teeth/Solid diet feeding), the I/P group (Intact upper molar teeth/Powder diet feeding), and the E/P group (Extracted upper molar teeth/Powder diet feeding). The observation periods were 4 and 16-week. To analyze the memory ability, the step-through passive avoidance test was conducted. BDNF-related mRNA in the hippocampus was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).Entities:
Keywords: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Memory deficit; Molar loss; Powder diet
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27919226 PMCID: PMC5137215 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-016-0319-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Fig. 1Time schedule of this experiment. Mice were randomly divided 4 groups for each experimental period (n = 12). At 32 and 44-weeks, behavioral test was performed in each 4 and 16 W group. I Intact upper molar tooth. E Extracted upper molar tooth. S Fed solid diet. P Fed powder diet
Fig. 2Body weight. During 28–31 week period, body weight were not significantly different among all group (n = 12). After 32 weeks, the weight of the E/P group was significantly lower than that of the I/S group. *P < 0.05, E/P vs I/S
Fig. 3Latency time after 4-week period. The latency time of the retention trial was significantly longer than that of the acquisition trial in all groups (n = 12)
Fig. 4Latency time after 16-week period. The latency time of the retention trial was significantly longer than that of the acquisition trial in the I/S and I/P groups (n = 12). Meanwhile, the latency time was not significantly different between the acquisition and retention trials in the E/S and E/P groups (n = 12)
Fig. 5Pyramidal cell in 4-week period. In CA1 and CA3 region, extracted molar mice had fewer pyramidal cells than intact molar mice. The number of pyramidal cells were similar between solid and powder diet mice. Two-way ANOVA were used to compare the groups. F(1, 20) = 12.52, P < 0.01 for molar loss; F(1, 20) = 1.36, P = 0.26 for powder diet; F(1, 20) = 0.91, P = 0.35 for molar loss × powder diet in CA1. F(1, 20) = 15.79, P < 0.01 for molar loss; F(1, 20) = 2.57, P = 0.12 for powder diet; F(1, 20) = 0.01, P = 0.94 for molar loss × powder diet in CA3. **, *P < 0.01, 0.05 vs respective extracted molar mice at same diet. Data represent mean ± SEM
Fig. 6Pyramidal cell in 16-week period. In CA1 and CA3 region, extracted molar mice had fewer pyramidal cells than intact molar mice. In CA1 region, powder diet mice had fewer than solid diet mice. Two-way ANOVA were used to compare the groups. F(1, 20) = 70.93, P < 0.01 for molar loss; F(1, 20) = 42.75, P < 0.01 for powder diet; F(1, 20) = 8.72, P < 0.01 for molar loss × powder diet in CA1. F(1, 20) = 16.57, P < 0.01 for molar loss; F(1, 20) = 3.13, P = 0.09 for powder diet; F(1, 20) = 0.35, P = 0.56 for molar loss × powder diet in CA3. **P < 0.01 vs respective extracted molar mice at same diet, ##P < 0.01 vs powder diet at intact molar mice. Data represent mean ± SEM
Fig. 7Influence of molar loss and powder diet on BDNF and TrkB mRNA levels in the hippocampus and hypothalamus of 4 and 16 week periods. mRNA levels were determined by RT-PCR and normalized relative to the level of GAPDH mRNA detected in each sample. Two-way ANOVA were used to compare the groups. 4 W Hippocampus BDNF; F(1, 20) = 4.36, P = 0.05 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 1.19, P = 0.29 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 1.08, P = 0.31 for molar loss × powder diet. 4 W Hippocampus TrkB; F(1, 20) = 0.48, P = 0.50 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 0.00, P = 0.99 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 0.04, P = 0.85 for molar loss × powder diet. 16 W Hippocampus BDNF, F(1, 20) = 46.33, P < 0.01 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 0.71, P = 0.41 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 4.52, P < 0.05 for molar loss × powder diet. 16 W Hippocampus Trk B; F(1, 20) = 2.82, P = 0.11 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 0.18, P = 0.67 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 17.86, P < 0.01 for molar loss × powder diet. 4 W Hypothalamus BDNF; F(1, 20) = 0.53, P = 0.48 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 0.14, P = 0.71 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 0.05, P = 0.82 for molar loss × powder diet. 4 W Hypothalamus TrkB; F(1, 20) = 0.05, P = 0.82 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 0.00, P = 0.98 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 0.08, P = 0.78 for molar loss × powder diet. 16 W Hypothalamus BDNF; F(1, 20) = 16.71, P < 0.01 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 1.13, P = 0.30 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 0.86, P = 0.36 for molar loss × powder diet. 16 W Hypothalamus TrkB; F(1, 20) = 0.14, P = 0.71 for molar loss, F(1, 20) = 0.33, P = 0.57 for powder diet, F(1, 20) = 0.38, P = 0.54 for molar loss × powder diet. **, *P < 0.01, 0.05 vs respective extracted molar mice at same diet, †P < 0.05 vs powder diet at extracted molar mice