Derya Kaşkari1, Ahmet Eftal Yücel1, Muhteşem Ağildere2. 1. a Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology , Baskent University İstanbul Hospital , ıstanbul, Turkey. 2. b Department of Radiology , Baskent University Faculty of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To document the prevalence of Spondyloarthropathy (SpA) with an evaluation of patients previously diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: The patients diagnosed with FMS before telephoned and asked three questions to determine for inflammatory back pain. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Fibromyalgia criteria 1990 and ACR 2010 and for diagnosing patients with SpA; criteria from the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG), and Amor were applied. RESULTS: FMS was diagnosed according to 1990 ACR criteria in 14 (60.8%) SpA patients who were diagnosed with SpA according to the Amor criteria alone and in 10 (43.4%) patients who were diagnosed according to ESSG criteria alone, while it was diagnosed in 9 (33.3%) patients who were diagnosed with SpA according to Amor and ESSG criteria together and in 15 (65.2%) patients diagnosed with SpA according to Amor and/or ESSG criteria. The most tenderness was experienced in the bilateral shoulder supraspinatus tendon insertion region (57.7%) and in the sacroiliac joint (40.8%). Fourteen (60.8%) patients diagnosed according to ACR 1990 and 17 (51.6%) patients diagnosed according to ACR 2010 had plantar fasciitis and/or Achilles enthesopathy on foot radiography. CONCLUSIONS: There is a meaningful section of patients who are SpA or FMS and SpA are together in the patients thought to be FMS or the patients diagnosed with FMS according to ACR's criteria can be said.
OBJECTIVE: To document the prevalence of Spondyloarthropathy (SpA) with an evaluation of patients previously diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: The patients diagnosed with FMS before telephoned and asked three questions to determine for inflammatory back pain. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Fibromyalgia criteria 1990 and ACR 2010 and for diagnosing patients with SpA; criteria from the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG), and Amor were applied. RESULTS: FMS was diagnosed according to 1990 ACR criteria in 14 (60.8%) SpA patients who were diagnosed with SpA according to the Amor criteria alone and in 10 (43.4%) patients who were diagnosed according to ESSG criteria alone, while it was diagnosed in 9 (33.3%) patients who were diagnosed with SpA according to Amor and ESSG criteria together and in 15 (65.2%) patients diagnosed with SpA according to Amor and/or ESSG criteria. The most tenderness was experienced in the bilateral shoulder supraspinatus tendon insertion region (57.7%) and in the sacroiliac joint (40.8%). Fourteen (60.8%) patients diagnosed according to ACR 1990 and 17 (51.6%) patients diagnosed according to ACR 2010 had plantar fasciitis and/or Achilles enthesopathy on foot radiography. CONCLUSIONS: There is a meaningful section of patients who are SpA or FMS and SpA are together in the patients thought to be FMS or the patients diagnosed with FMS according to ACR's criteria can be said.
Entities:
Keywords:
1990 and 2010 ACR Fibromyalgia criteria; Amor and ESSG criteria; Spondyloarthropathy
Authors: Alessia Alunno; Francesco Carubbi; Simon Stones; Roberto Gerli; Roberto Giacomelli; Xenofon Baraliakos Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2018-10-24