Literature DB >> 27919113

Analysis of Flap Weight and Postoperative Complications Based on Flap Weight in Patients Undergoing Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

Gretl Lam1, Katie E Weichman2, Patrick L Reavey3, Stelios C Wilson1, Jamie P Levine1, Pierre B Saadeh1, Robert J Allen1, Mihye Choi1, Nolan S Karp1, Vishal D Thanik1.   

Abstract

Background Higher body mass index (BMI) has been shown to increase postoperative complications in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the correlation with flap weight is unknown. Here, we explore the relationship of flap weights and complication rates in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. Methods Retrospective chart review identified all patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps at a single institution between November 2007 and April 2013. Breasts with documented flap weight and 1-year follow-up were included. Patients undergoing stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps were excluded. Breasts were divided into quartiles based on flap weight and examined by demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, and revisions. Results A total of 130 patients undergoing 225 flaps were identified. Patients had a mean age of 50.4 years, mean BMI of 27.1 kg/m2, and mean flap weight of 638.4 g (range: 70-1640 g). Flap weight and BMI were directly correlated. Flaps were divided into weight-based quartiles: first (70-396 g), second (397-615 g), third (616-870 g), and fourth (871-1640 g). There were no associations between flap weight and incidences of venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, hematoma, flap loss, fat necrosis, or donor site hernia. However, increased flap weight was associated with increased rate of donor site wound healing problems in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions Increased flap weight is not associated with added flap complications among patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction, however, patients with flaps of 667.5 g or more are more likely to have donor site healing problems. The success and evidence contrary to previous studies may be attributed to surgeon intraoperative flap choice. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919113     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1594298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  3 in total

1.  Does the breast reconstruction method have an impact on time delay to adjuvant chemotherapy - A comparison between autologous and expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Monika Lanthaler; Katharina Spechtler; Johanna Krapf; Daniel Egle; Michael Sieb; Christoph Tasch; Rossella Spinelli; Gerhard Pierer; Thomas Bauer
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?

Authors:  Christine Velazquez; Robert C Siska; Ivo A Pestana
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  Complications following immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

Authors:  J Beugels; L Bod; S M J van Kuijk; S S Qiu; S M H Tuinder; E M Heuts; A Piatkowski; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.