Literature DB >> 27918945

Constructed wetlands for the removal of metals from livestock wastewater - Can the presence of veterinary antibiotics affect removals?

C Marisa R Almeida1, Filipa Santos2, A Catarina F Ferreira3, Carlos Rocha Gomes3, M Clara P Basto3, Ana P Mucha2.   

Abstract

The presence of emergent antibiotics, in livestock wastewater may affect constructed wetlands (CWs) performance in the removal of other pollutants. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of two antibiotics commonly used in livestock industry, enrofloxacin and ceftiofur, on metal removal by CWs. Microcosms (0.4m×0.3m×0.3m), simulating CWs, were constructed with Phragmites australis to treat livestock wastewater spiked or not with 100µg/L of enrofloxacin or ceftiofur (individually or in mixture). Wastewater was treated during 20 one-week cycles. After one-week cycle wastewater was removed and replaced by new wastewater (with or without spiking). At weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 14, 18 and 20, treated wastewater was analysed to determine the removal rates of metals (Zn, Cu, Fe and Mn) and of each antibiotic. At weeks 1, 8 and 20 portions of the plant root substrate were collected and metals determined. At the end of the experiment metal levels were also determined in plant tissues. Removal rate of Fe from wastewater was 99%. Removal rates of Cu and Zn were higher than 85% and 89%, respectively, whereas for Mn removal rates up to 75% were obtained. In general, no significant differences were observed through time in the removals of the different metals, indicating that the systems maintained their functionality during the experimental period. Antibiotics did not interfere with the system depuration capacity, in terms of metals removals from wastewater, and ceftiofur even promoted metal uptake by P. australis. Therefore, CWs seem to be a valuable alternative to remove pollutants, including antibiotics and metals, from livestock wastewaters, reducing the risk the release of these wastewaters might pose into the environment, although more research should be conducted with other antibiotics in CWs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enrofloxacin; Green technology; Remediation; Wastewaters

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27918945     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  3 in total

Review 1.  Phytoremediation potential and control of Phragmites australis as a green phytomass: an overview.

Authors:  Shahabaldin Rezania; Junboum Park; Parveen Fatemeh Rupani; Negisa Darajeh; Xin Xu; Rahim Shahrokhishahraki
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse.

Authors:  Sofia Dias; Ana P Mucha; Rute Duarte Crespo; Pedro Rodrigues; C Marisa R Almeida
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Heavy-Metal Phytoremediation from Livestock Wastewater and Exploitation of Exhausted Biomass.

Authors:  Monika Hejna; Elisabetta Onelli; Alessandra Moscatelli; Maurizio Bellotto; Cinzia Cristiani; Nadia Stroppa; Luciana Rossi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.