Literature DB >> 27918838

Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning.

Johanna Eklund1, Mar Cabeza1.   

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are a key tool for biodiversity conservation and play a central role in the Convention on Biological Diversity. Recently, the effectiveness of PAs has been questioned, and assessing how effective they are in enabling the future persistence of biodiversity is not trivial. Here, we focus on terrestrial PAs and clarify the terminology related to PA effectiveness, distinguishing between management and ecological aspects. We suggest that the quality of governance affects both aspects of effectiveness but recognize a lack of synthetic understanding of the topic. We present a conceptual framework linking the underlying mechanisms by which the quality of governance affects conservation outcomes in PAs and how this relates to conservation planning. We show that it is crucial to separate pressure and response and how these together will lead to the observed conservation outcomes. We urge for more focused attention on governance factors and in particular more empirical research on how to address causality and how to account for the quality of governance when prioritizing actions. Our framework is linked to the classic concepts of systematic conservation planning and clarifies the strategies available to achieve a comprehensive and effective network of PAs.
© 2016 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PA effectiveness; PA management; conservation planning; governance; protected area

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27918838     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  7 in total

1.  Expanding Staff Voice in Protected Area Management Effectiveness Assessments within Kenya's Maasai Mara National Reserve.

Authors:  Lawrence Allen; Katie Krafte Holland; Hunter Holland; Salaton Tome'; Moriaso Nabaala; Simon Seno; James Nampushi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Evaluating the management effectiveness of protected areas in Mongolia using the management effectiveness tracking tool.

Authors:  Oyunchimeg Namsrai; Altansukh Ochir; Oyungerel Baast; J L van Genderen; Andreas Muhar; Sanzheev Erdeni; Juanle Wang; Davaadorj Davaasuren; Sonomdagva Chonokhuu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Assessing the effectiveness of a national protected area network for carnivore conservation.

Authors:  J Terraube; J Van Doninck; P Helle; M Cabeza
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Population Density and Driving Factors of North China Leopards in Tie Qiao Shan Nature Reserve.

Authors:  Mengyan Zhu; Muhammad Zaman; Meng Wang; Kasereka Vitekere; Jianzhang Ma; Guangshun Jiang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Conservation Effects of Governance and Management of Sacred Natural Sites: Lessons from Vhutanda in the Vhembe Region, Limpopo Province of South Africa.

Authors:  Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  An Outcome-Oriented, Social-Ecological Framework for Assessing Protected Area Effectiveness.

Authors:  Arash Ghoddousi; Jacqueline Loos; Tobias Kuemmerle
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 8.589

7.  Changes in the human footprint in and around Indonesia's terrestrial national parks between 2012 and 2017.

Authors:  Asri A Dwiyahreni; Habiburrachman A H Fuad; Sunaryo Muhtar; T E Budhi Soesilo; Chris Margules; Jatna Supriatna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.