Literature DB >> 27918375

Treatments and other prognostic factors in the management of the open abdomen: A systematic review.

Adam T Cristaudo1, Scott B Jennings, Kerry Hitos, Ronny Gunnarsson, Alan DeCosta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The open abdomen (OA) is an important approach for managing intra-abdominal catastrophes and continues to be the standard of care. Despite this, challenges remain with it associated with a high incidence of complications and poor outcomes. The objective of this article is to perform a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify prognostic factors in OA patients in regard to definitive fascial closure (DFC), mortality and intra-abdominal complications.
METHODS: An electronic database search was conducted involving Medline, Excerpta Medica, Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing, and Allied Health Literature and Clinicaltrials.gov. All studies that described prognostic factors in regard to the above outcomes in OA patients were eligible for inclusion. Data collected were synthesized by each outcome of interest and assessed for methodological quality.
RESULTS: Thirty-one studies were included in the final synthesis. Enteral nutrition, organ dysfunction, local and systemic infection, number of reexplorations, worsening Injury Severity Score, and the development of a fistula appeared to significantly delay DFC. Age and Adult Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation version II score were predictors for in-hospital mortality. Failed DFC, large bowel resection and >5 to 10 L of intravenous fluids in <48 hours were predictors of enteroatmospheric fistula. The source of infection (small bowel as opposed to colon) was a predictor for ventral hernia. Large bowel resection, >5 to 10 and >10 L of intravenous fluids in <48 hours were predictors of intra-abdominal abscess. Fascial closure on (or after) day 5 and having a bowel anastomosis were predictors for anastomotic leak. Overall methodological quality was of a moderate level. LIMITATIONS: Overall methodological quality, high number of retrospective studies, low reporting of prognostic factors and the multitude of factors potentially affecting patient outcome that were not analyzed.
CONCLUSION: Careful selection and management of OA patients will avoid prolonged treatment and facilitate early DFC. Future research should focus on the development of a prognostic model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27918375     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  12 in total

1.  Peritoneal cavity lavage reduces the presence of mitochondrial damage associated molecular patterns in open abdomen patients.

Authors:  Patricia A Martinez-Quinones; Cameron G McCarthy; Caleb J Mentzer; Camilla F Wenceslau; Steven B Holsten; R Clinton Webb; Keith O'Malley
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Open Abdomen in Obese Patients: Pay Attention! New Evidences from IROA, the International Register of Open Abdomen.

Authors:  Marco Ceresoli; Francesco Salvetti; Yoram Kluger; Marco Braga; Jacopo Viganò; Paola Fugazzola; Massimo Sartelli; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena; Federico Coccolini
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Ke Wang; Junhua Gong; Zuojin Liu; Jianping Gong; Zhong Zeng; Xiaomei Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 4.  Successful treatment of enteroatmospheric fistulas in combination with negative pressure wound therapy: Experience on 3 cases and literature review.

Authors:  Ulrich Wirth; Bernhard W Renz; Dorian Andrade; Tobias S Schiergens; Helmut Arbogast; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Open Abdomen Management and Candida Infections: A Very Likely Link.

Authors:  Savino Occhionorelli; Monica Zese; Rosario Cultrera; Domenico Lacavalla; Marco Albanese; Giorgio Vasquez
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  A preliminary prospective study of patients who underwent vacuum-assisted and mesh-mediated fascial traction techniques for open abdomen management with negative fluid therapy: An observational study.

Authors:  Weiliang Tian; Qian Huang; Zheng Yao; Ming Huang; Fan Yang; Yunzhao Zhao; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Underlying disease determines the risk of an open abdomen treatment, final closure, however, is determined by the surgical abdominal history.

Authors:  Steffi Karhof; Mark Haverkort; Rogier Simmermacher; Falco Hietbrink; Luke Leenen; Karlijn van Wessem
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Preoperative physical functional status affects the long-term outcomes of elderly patients with open abdomen.

Authors:  Ichiro Okada; Toru Hifumi; Nobuaki Kiriu; Hisashi Yoneyama; Kazushige Inoue; Satoshi Seki; Eiju Hasegawa; Hiroshi Kato; Tomohiko Masuno; Shoji Yokobori
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2020-11-28

9.  Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gaetano Poillucci; Mauro Podda; Giulia Russo; Sergio Gaetano Perri; Domenico Ipri; Gabriele Manetti; Maria Giulia Lolli; Renato De Angelis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis-guided fluid management promotes primary fascial closure after open abdomen: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Ding; Jie-Shou Li; Kai Wang; Shi-Long Sun; Xin-Yu Wang; Cheng-Nan Chu; Ze-Hua Duan; Chao Yang; Bao-Chen Liu; Wei-Qin Li
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.