BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was developed by Talairach and Bancaud in Paris in the late 1950s. Subsequently, the Talairach methodology was adopted at a number of additional centers in Europe and Canada. Technical aspects remained essentially unchanged for the following 30 years. Only in the last two decades, because of advancements in image-guided surgery systems, robotics, and computer-aided planning, use of SEEG has become more widespread, and reports describing these new developments have been published. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was designed to assess published reports of SEEG surgical techniques and safety profile. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was performed of Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. In addition, the content pages of several standard epilepsy surgery textbooks were searched. Full-text English studies describing SEEG surgical technique or pertinent epidemiological data were included. Conference abstracts, reviews, posters, editorials, comments, and letters were excluded. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-nine of 2,903 potentially eligible studies published by 32 centers were reviewed. Thirty-one of these primarily discussed the surgical technique. Thirty-five major complications (including 4 fatalities) were reported among 4,000 patients (0.8%) implanted with 33,000 electrodes. LIMITATIONS: The number of SEEG patients is likely to be underestimated because only a few groups have exhaustively reported their experience. Moreover, it is possible that a number of teams performing SEEG have not published studies on the topic. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous SEEG, thanks to its basic principles and updated technologies, is a safe and accurate method to define the epileptogenic zone by means of stereotactically implanted intracerebral electrodes.
BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was developed by Talairach and Bancaud in Paris in the late 1950s. Subsequently, the Talairach methodology was adopted at a number of additional centers in Europe and Canada. Technical aspects remained essentially unchanged for the following 30 years. Only in the last two decades, because of advancements in image-guided surgery systems, robotics, and computer-aided planning, use of SEEG has become more widespread, and reports describing these new developments have been published. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was designed to assess published reports of SEEG surgical techniques and safety profile. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was performed of Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. In addition, the content pages of several standard epilepsy surgery textbooks were searched. Full-text English studies describing SEEG surgical technique or pertinent epidemiological data were included. Conference abstracts, reviews, posters, editorials, comments, and letters were excluded. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-nine of 2,903 potentially eligible studies published by 32 centers were reviewed. Thirty-one of these primarily discussed the surgical technique. Thirty-five major complications (including 4 fatalities) were reported among 4,000 patients (0.8%) implanted with 33,000 electrodes. LIMITATIONS: The number of SEEG patients is likely to be underestimated because only a few groups have exhaustively reported their experience. Moreover, it is possible that a number of teams performing SEEG have not published studies on the topic. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous SEEG, thanks to its basic principles and updated technologies, is a safe and accurate method to define the epileptogenic zone by means of stereotactically implanted intracerebral electrodes.
Authors: Vejay N Vakharia; Rachel Sparks; Aidan G O'Keeffe; Roman Rodionov; Anna Miserocchi; Andrew McEvoy; Sebastien Ourselin; John Duncan Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Davide Scorza; Elena De Momi; Lisa Plaino; Gaetano Amoroso; Gabriele Arnulfo; Massimo Narizzano; Luis Kabongo; Francesco Cardinale Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Jonathan K Kleen; Benjamin A Speidel; Maxime O Baud; Vikram R Rao; Simon G Ammanuel; Liberty S Hamilton; Edward F Chang; Robert C Knowlton Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Vejay N Vakharia; John S Duncan; Juri-Alexander Witt; Christian E Elger; Richard Staba; Jerome Engel Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Marc J Casale; Lara V Marcuse; James J Young; Nathalie Jette; Fedor E Panov; H Allison Bender; Adam E Saad; Ravi S Ghotra; Saadi Ghatan; Anuradha Singh; Ji Yeoun Yoo; Madeline C Fields Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.590