| Literature DB >> 27917901 |
Omid Zabihi1, Mojtaba Ahmadi2, Hamid Khayyam1, Minoo Naebe1.
Abstract
Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) has been recently found to be an efficient renewable and environmentally-friendlyEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27917901 PMCID: PMC5137040 DOI: 10.1038/srep38194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1An ideal DNA structure and the chemical procedure to intercalate DNA within the clay and its solubility profiles.
Figure 2FTIR spectrums (a), XPS survey spectrum (b), TGA analysis (c), and XRD patterns (d) of the various samples.
Surface elemental composition of the p-clay and d-clay in atomic ratios relative to aluminium taken as a unique elemental marker for clay structure.
| Samples | Al/Al | C/Al | O/Al | N/Al | P/Al | Na/Al |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-clay | 1.000 | 1.632 | 8.884 | 0.108 | 0.000 | 0.153 |
| d-clay | 1.000 | 1.854 | 9.605 | 0.474 | 0.042 | 0.000 |
Figure 3Evaluation of geometric shapes of epoxy droplet deposited on m-clay (a,b) and d-clay (c,d) at two different times, and their calculated work of dispersion and volumes.
Figure 4DSC thermograms (a), viscosity (b) and stress (c) versus shear rate for various un-cured epoxy suspensions; possible intra-gallery reactions in d-clay, and schematic presentation of shear-thinning behaviour of epoxy suspensions of containing d-clay.
Herschel–Bulkley’s model parameters obtained from rheology behavior of various nano-suspensions.
| Suspension | Yield stress τc (Pa) | Flow consistency | Flow index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure EP | 0 | 1.81 | 0.92 |
| EP-M2.5 | 6.52 | 5.35 | 0.83 |
| EP-M5 | 9.47 | 10.63 | 0.87 |
| EP-D2.5 | 25.22 | 11.14 | 0.76 |
| EP-D5 | 33.02 | 35.82 | 0.72 |
Figure 5XRD patterns of pure EP and its nanocomposites.
Figure 6TEM micrographs of EP-D2.5 (a–c), and EP-D5 (d–f) nanocomposites.
Figure 7Tensile (a) and fracture toughness properties (b), and storage modulus (c) and tan δ (d) vs temperature for pure EP and its various epoxy nanocomposites.
Results of DMTA analyses for cured epoxy systems.
| Sample | EP | EP-M2.5 | EP-D2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 172 | 169 | 178 | |
| 99 | 80 | 120 | |
| 1.43 | 1.81 | 1.92 | |
| 1.96 | 1.61 | 2.31 |
Figure 8Fracture surfaces of pure EP (a), EP-M2.5 (b), EP-M5 (c), EP-D2.5 (d), and EP-D5 (e) nanocomposites.
Figure 9TGA thermograms (a), Kissinger plots for thermo-oxidative degradation (b), HRR vs time (c), and THR vs time (d) for the pure EP (i), EP-M2.5 (ii), and EP-D2.5 (iii) systems.
Thermal characteristics of various nanocomposites obtained by TGA and cone calorimetry analyses.
| System | %Char yield at 850 °C | PHRR (kW/m2) | THR (MJ/m2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure epoxy | 283 | 320 | 468 | 0.75 | 110.9 | 1542 | 71 | 76.2 |
| EP-M2.5 | 299 | 339 | 572 | 9.2 | 162.2 | 1298 | 87 | 56.6 |
| EP-D2.5 | 315 | 345 | 591 | 13.3 | 172.4 | 1220 | 96 | 52.4 |
Figure 10SEM images of char residues after cone calorimetry tests, and flame test photographs in the 10th second for the various samples.
Figure 11Schematic showing the dispersion of clay in the epoxy matrix via the simplified “slurry-compounding” process.