Literature DB >> 27917493

Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.

Hisashi Noma1, Shiro Tanaka2, Shigeyuki Matsui3, Andrea Cipriani4, Toshi A Furukawa5.   

Abstract

Network meta-analysis enables comprehensive synthesis of evidence concerning multiple treatments and their simultaneous comparisons based on both direct and indirect evidence. A fundamental pre-requisite of network meta-analysis is the consistency of evidence that is obtained from different sources, particularly whether direct and indirect evidence are in accordance with each other or not, and how they may influence the overall estimates. We have developed an efficient method to quantify indirect evidence, as well as a testing procedure to evaluate their inconsistency using Lindsay's composite likelihood method. We also show that this estimator has complete information for the indirect evidence. Using this method, we can assess the degree of consistency between direct and indirect evidence and their contribution rates to the overall estimate. Sensitivity analyses can be also conducted with this method to assess the influences of potentially inconsistent treatment contrasts on the overall results. These methods can provide useful information for overall comparative results that might be biased from specific inconsistent treatment contrasts. We also provide some fundamental requirements for valid inference on these methods concerning consistency restrictions on multi-arm trials. In addition, the efficiency of the developed method is demonstrated based on simulation studies. Applications to a network meta-analysis of 12 new-generation antidepressants are presented.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  composite likelihood methods; inconsistency; indirect evidence; likelihood factorization; network meta-analysis; sensitivity analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27917493     DOI: 10.1002/sim.7187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The statistical importance of a study for a network meta-analysis estimate.

Authors:  Gerta Rücker; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Theodoros Papakonstantinou; Georgia Salanti; Richard D Riley; Guido Schwarzer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  The long-term outcomes of different grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenbo Yang; Xin Huang; Shangyu Wang; Hong Wang; Wei Huang; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A bibliometric analysis of global research output on network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiyuan Shi; Ya Gao; Liu Ming; Kelu Yang; Yue Sun; Ji Chen; Shuzhen Shi; Jie Geng; Lun Li; Jiarui Wu; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption.

Authors:  Corinna Kiefer; Sibylle Sturtz; Ralf Bender
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.