| Literature DB >> 27917344 |
Guang Yang1, Chongshi Gu2, Tengfei Bao2, Zhenming Cui3, Kan Kan3.
Abstract
Warning indicators of the dam body's temperature are required for the real-time monitoring of the service conditions of concrete dams to ensure safety and normal operations. Warnings theories are traditionally targeted at a single point which have limitations, and the scientific warning theories on global behavior of the temperature field are non-existent. In this paper, first, in 3D space, the behavior of temperature field has regional dissimilarity. Through the Ward spatial clustering method, the temperature field was divided into regions. Second, the degree of order and degree of disorder of the temperature monitoring points were defined by the probability method. Third, the weight values of monitoring points of each regions were explored via projection pursuit. Forth, a temperature entropy expression that can describe degree of order of the spatial temperature field in concrete dams was established. Fifth, the early-warning index of temperature entropy was set up according to the calculated sequential value of temperature entropy. Finally, project cases verified the feasibility of the proposed theories. The early-warning index of temperature entropy is conducive to the improvement of early-warning ability and safety management levels during the operation of high concrete dams.Entities:
Keywords: Early-warning; Projection pursuit; Spatial temperature field; Synergetics; Temperature entropy; Ward spatial clustering
Year: 2016 PMID: 27917344 PMCID: PMC5108745 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3659-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Development law of monitoring the measuring point values in different periods
Fig. 2Hierarchical structure of temperature entropy of the spatial temperature field
Fig. 3Flow diagram of the calculation of spatial temperature entropy
Fig. 4Thermometer distribution of the 6th dam block
Fig. 5Partition map of the spatial temperature field of the 6th dam block
Measuring point clustering partition table of the spatial temperature field
| Partitions | Measuring points | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partition I | A6-T-15 | A6-T-16 | A6-T-21 | A6-T-22 | A6-T-26 | |||||||
| Partition II | A6-T-09 | A6-T-10 | A6-T-15 | A6-T-16 | A6-T-20 | A6-T-23 | A6-T-25 | A6-T-29 | ||||
| Partition III | A6-T-06 | A6-T-07 | A6-T-08 | A6-T-11 | A6-T-12 | A6-T-13 | A6-T-14 | A6-T-17 | A6-T-18 | A6-T-19 | A6-T-24 | A6-T-27 |
| A6-T-28 | A6-T-35 | A6-T-36 | A6-T-37 | A6-T-38 | ||||||||
Fig. 6Curve of environmental temperature
Fig. 7Temperature monitoring sequence of A6-T-21
Weight table of the observation points of the 6th dam block in the rising and declining air temperature phases
| Partitions | Measuring points | Temperature rise phase | Temperature decline phase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partition I | A6-T-15 | 0.13 | 0.23 |
| A6-T-16 | 0.14 | 0.09 | |
| A6-T-21 | 0.34 | 0.39 | |
| A6-T-22 | 0.32 | 0.15 | |
| A6-T-26 | 0.07 | 0.14 | |
| Partition II | A6-T-09 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| A6-T-10 | 0.09 | 0.11 | |
| A6-T-15 | 0.12 | 0.14 | |
| A6-T-16 | 0.13 | 0.11 | |
| A6-T-20 | 0.26 | 0.27 | |
| A6-T-23 | 0.18 | 0.14 | |
| A6-T-25 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
| A6-T-29 | 0.06 | 0.07 | |
| Partition III | A6-T-06 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| A6-T-07 | 0.04 | 0.07 | |
| A6-T-08 | 0.03 | 0.07 | |
| A6-T-11 | 0.06 | 0.05 | |
| A6-T-12 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
| A6-T-13 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |
| A6-T-14 | 0.07 | 0.08 | |
| A6-T-17 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |
| A6-T-18 | 0.08 | 0.04 | |
| A6-T-19 | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
| A6-T-24 | 0.06 | 0.07 | |
| A6-T-27 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |
| A6-T-28 | 0.03 | 0.07 | |
| A6-T-35 | 0.06 | 0.04 | |
| A6-T-36 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| A6-T-37 | 0.07 | 0.06 | |
| A6-T-38 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Fig. 8Temperature entropy curve of partition I
Fig. 9Temperature entropy curve of partition II
Fig. 10Temperature entropy curve of partition III
Annual extreme temperature entropies
| Temperature entropy | Year | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
| Minimum value of partition I | 0.763 | 0.632 | 1.235 | 1.032 | 1.124 | 1.342 |
| Minimum value of partition II | 1.142 | 1.208 | 1.126 | 1.034 | 1.171 | 1.164 |
| Minimum value of partition III | 1.132 | 1.418 | 1.324 | 1.053 | 1.132 | 1.145 |
K–S test results
| Probability distribution | Partition I | Partition II | Partition III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lognormal distribution | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| Normal distribution | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.31 |
| Uniform distribution | 0.78 | 0.95 | 0.86 |
| Triangular distribution | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
| Exponential distribution | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.65 |
|
| 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.21 |
|
| 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| The most reasonable probability distribution | Normal distribution | Normal distribution | Normal distribution |
K–S test shows that the annual extreme temperature entropies of all partitions satisfy the normal distribution
Parameter values of the probability density function
| Partition | Parameter values | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Partition I | 1.021333 | 0.07549 |
| Partition II | 1.140833 | 0.003519 |
| Partition III | 1.200667 | 0.019356 |
Early-warning index values of all partitions
| Early-warning level |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Early-warning index values | ||
| PartitionI | 0.569363 | 0.381156 |
| Partition II | 1.04325 | 1.002615 |
| Partition III | 0.971805 | 0.876503 |