| Literature DB >> 27917341 |
Fakhreddin Taghaddosinejad1, Esmaeil Farzaneh2, Mahdi Ghazanfari-Nasrabad3, Nastaran Eizadi-Mood4, Morteza Hajihosseini5, Omid Mehrpour6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aluminum phosphide (AlP) is a very effective indoor and outdoor pesticide. We investigated the effects of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) on the survival time, hemodynamics, and cardiac biochemical parameters at various time intervals in some cases of AlP poisoning.Entities:
Keywords: Aluminum phosphide; N-acetyl cysteine; Pesticide; Rice tablet
Year: 2016 PMID: 27917341 PMCID: PMC5102994 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3630-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Characteristics of variables in different times in two groups
| Variables | Group | Admission time | 12 h after admission | 18 h after admission | 24 h after admission |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | ||
| CK-MB | Control | 20.45 (1.1) | 40.54 (0.9)* | 51.45 (1.7)* | 70.09 (2.6)* |
| Case (NAC) | 23.69 (1.8) | 40.53 (1.9)* | 52.30 (2.3)* | 68.07 (2.2)* | |
| P value | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.11 | 0.21 | |
| CPK | Control | 320.90 (38.6) | 344.90 (23.5) | 726.36 (44.1)* | 1182.81 (114.9)* |
| Case (NAC) | 358.15 (48.8) | 367.69 (30.2) | 726.69 (68.2)* | 1004.69 (172.5)* | |
| P value | 0.82 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.31 | |
| HR | Control | 80.36 (3.9) | 73.45 (4.7) | 69.63 (5.1)* | 75.81 (4.0) |
| Case (NAC) | 82.76 (3.1) | 77.69 (6.1) | 78.46 (4.6) | 77.76 (3.7) | |
| P value | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.45 | 0.56 | |
| SBP | Control | 106.63 (2.4) | 98.81 (2.5)* | 93.18 (1.2)* | 96.54 (1.2) |
| Case (NAC) | 100.15 (3.9) | 93.30 (1.5)* | 94.38 (4.1)* | 102.61 (2.7)* | |
| P value | 0.23 | 0.94 | 0.55 | 0.32 |
CK-MB creatine kinase-MB fraction, CPK creatine phosphokinase, HR heart rate, SBP systolic blood pressure case group received NAC beside conventional therapy
* Significantly different with admission time in each group
Distribution of ECG changes in different times
| ECG changes | Admission time | 12 h | 18 h | 24 h | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (%) | Control (%) | Case (%) | Control (%) | Case (%) | Control (%) | Case (%) | Control (%) | |
| No evidence | 56.5 | 60.9 | 39.1 | 47.8 | 34.8 | 43.5 | 26.1 | 30.4 |
| Sinus tachycardia | 13.0 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 8.7 | 8.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Sinus bradycardia | 8.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 | NAD | NAD | NAD | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| PVC | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD |
| PAC | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | NAD |
| QRS widening | 8.7 | 8.7 | 8.7 | 8.7 | 4.3 | NAD | 4.3 | NAD |
| ST. elevation | 8.7 | 4.3 | 8.7 | NAD | 8.7 | NAD | 13.0 | NAD |
| A.F. | NAD | NAD | 4.3 | NAD | NAD | NAD | 4.3 | NAD |
| V.T | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD | 13.0 | 21.7 | 4.3 | NAD |
| V.F. | NAD | NAD | NAD | NAD | 4.3 | 4.3 | NAD | 4.3 |
NAD no abnormality detected
Fig. 1Estimated marginal means in two groups over time