| Literature DB >> 27917122 |
Brian DellaValle1, Gitte S Brix2, Birgitte Brock3, Michael Gejl3, Anne M Landau4, Arne Møller4, Jørgen Rungby5, Agnete Larsen2.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent findings indicate that metabolic disturbances are involved in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology and influence the susceptibility to treatment, directing attention toward anti-diabetic drugs such as metformin and pioglitazone. Liraglutide, a drug of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) family, is also anti-diabetic and weight-reducing and is, moreover, directly neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory in a broad spectrum of experimental models of brain disease. In this study we investigate the potential for this FDA-approved drug, liraglutide, as a treatment for MS by utilizing the experimental model, experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE).Entities:
Keywords: APP; EAE; GLP-1; MS; MnSOD; liraglutide; multiple sclerosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27917122 PMCID: PMC5114298 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1EAE-emulsion induces weight loss in all animals. EAE was induced with EAE emulsion at day 0. Animals were randomly selected for vehicle (Veh) and liraglutide (Lira) treatment arms and treated by blinded investigators twice-daily with saline (n = 15) or 200 μg/kg of Lira (n = 15) (s.c.). Healthy animals were treated equally without EAE emulsion (n = Veh:7, Lira:6). Weight of EAE (closed line) and healthy (dotted line) animals for each treatment arm (Veh:black; Lira:blue). Lira treatment induces weight loss at the initial phase of the experiment. All animals receiving EAE-emulsion experienced a weight loss, even in animals with clinical score of 0 at day 11. This reflects a full penetrance of the induction. Arrows denote the interval when mean weight loss began for Veh (black) and Lira (blue) and is described as EAE-associated weight loss phase. Statistics are derived from: normality test (Shapiro–Wilk), thereafter two-way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak multiple comparisons test.
Figure 2Liraglutide treatment delays clinical presentation and reduces clinical score in EAE. EAE was induced with EAE emulsion at day 0. Animals were randomly selected for vehicle (Veh) and liraglutide (Lira) treatment arms and treated by blinded investigators twice-daily with saline (n = 15) or 200 μg/kg of Lira (n = 15) (s.c.). Healthy animals were treated equally without EAE emulsion (n = Veh:7, Lira:6). Clinical scores were conducted twice-daily (A) and plotted as Veh (black) and Lira (blue) median ± interquartile range. Disease debut: a groupwise clinical score that was significantly higher than 0 is denoted in (A) with arrows for Veh (black) and Lira (blue). Asterisks represent a significant difference in animals with EAE treated with Veh vs. Lira. (B) Median clinical score at termination (via humane endpoint or day 11) is significantly lower in Lira animals than Veh with EAE. Statistics are derived from: (A,B) non-parametric analysis of clinical scoring. Statistical significance is reported as *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Liraglutide treatment significantly increases antioxidant capacity and reduces neurodegenerative precursor APP in the EAE brain. Brains were isolated from EAE animals and the brainstem and right hemisphere of the cerebrum were homogenized for immunoblotting. Manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) levels were significantly increased ~1.6- and 2.6-fold of EAE animals treated with Lira in the brainstem and cerebrum, respectively. Levels of the marker of axonal damage, amyloid-precursor protein (APP), were reduced by 30% in the cerebrum of Lira-treated animals. There was no difference in APP levels in the brainstem of Lira-treated rats. APP was significantly higher in the brainstem than in the cerebrum. All data points are reported as dot plot of MnSOD, and APP levels relative to housekeeping protein GAPDH and significance was tested with parametric analysis after normality was tested (Shapiro-Wilk) (B–D); (A) data was log-transformed, re-tested for normality and tested with parametric analysis. Statistical significance is reported as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; n = 6–7.
Figure 4Liraglutide treatment does not affect astroglial GFAP levels in EAE brain. Brains were isolated from EAE animals and the brainstem and right hemisphere of the cerebrum were homogenized for immunoblotting. Astroglial marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels (A,B) were significantly higher in the cerebrum than the brainstem but were not affected by liraglutide treatment. All data points are reported as dot plot of GFAP levels relative to housekeeping protein GAPDH and significance was tested with parametric analysis after normality was tested (Shapiro–Wilk); n = 6–7.