| Literature DB >> 27917104 |
Khalil Khoury1, Elie Barbar2, Youssef Ainmelk3, Annie Ouellet3, Pierre Lavigne2, Jean-Guy LeHoux2.
Abstract
Objective: Review the impact of StAR (STARD1) mutations on steroidogenesis and fertility in LCAH patients. Examine the endocrine mechanisms underlying the pathology of the disorder and the appropriate therapy for promoting fertility and pregnancies. Design: Published data in the literature and a detailed 38-year follow-up of two sibling LCAH patients. Molecular structure and modeling of the STARD1 L275P mutation. Setting: University hospital. Patients: Patient A (46,XY female phenotype) and patient B (46,XX female) with LCAH bearing the L275P mutation in STARD1. Interventions: Since early-age diagnosis, both patients underwent corticoid replacement therapy. Patient A received estrogen therapy at pubertal age. Clomiphene therapy was given to Patient B to induce ovulation. Pregnancies were protected with progesterone administration. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical and molecular assessment of adrenal and gonadal functions.Entities:
Keywords: LCAH; cholesterol; fertility; molecular structure; pregnancy; spontaneous puberty; steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR, STARD1); therapy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27917104 PMCID: PMC5116571 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Patient A.
| Day 2 | 966 | 670 | 19.46 | 0 |
| Day 1 | 634 | 621 | 22.2 | <0.03 |
| Day 0 | 739 | 474 | 11.95 | <0.03 |
| Day 3 | 811 | 244 | 15.29 | <0.03 |
| Day 4 | 497 | 357 | 13.34 | <0.09 |
ACTH stimulation test: Injection of ACTH-Gel 25 IU/m.
Patient A.
| ~3 years | – | – | − | 0.15 | 0.69 | − | 0.1 | – | |
| ~4 years | – | – | − | − | <0.35 | <0.3 | <0.35 | – | |
| 5 10/12 years | 3.9 | <2.7 | − | − | 1.73 | <0.3 | <0.35 | – | |
| 6 7/12 years | 13.8 | <5 | − | − | 2.08 | <0.7 | <0.35 | – | |
| 7 6/12 years | 8.6 | <5 | − | − | − | − | <0.35 | – | |
| 8 years | 23 | <5 | − | − | − | − | <0.35 | – | |
| 8 9/12 years | 11.8 | 5.1 | − | − | − | − | <0.35 | <0.6 | |
| 10 4/12 years | 11.6 | <2 | − | − | − | − | <0.35 | <2 | |
| 12 6/12 years | 4.6 | <0.5 | − | − | <1.7 | <0.3 | <0.7 | <3 | |
| hCG (IM) 4000 IU/dX5 days | D 0 | 33.2 | 1.8 | <0.16 | <0.3 | <1.5 | <0.3 | <0.7 | <1.0 |
| D 3 | – | – | <0.16 | <0.3 | <1.5 | <0.3 | <0.7 | – | |
| D 4 | – | – | <0.16 | <0.3 | <1.5 | <0.3 | <0.7 | – | |
| D 6 | – | – | <0.16 | <0.3 | <1.5 | <0.3 | <0.7 | <2.1 | |
T, total; F, free; D, day; –, not available. Normal values are indicated for different ages:
FSH: Prepubertal 0.26–3 IU/L, puberty Tanner II, III 0.6–10.9 IU/L.
LH: Prepubertal 0.02–0.3 IU/L, puberty Tanner II, III 0.2–5.0 IU/L.
17-OH pregnenolone: Puberty Tanner II, III 0.6–10.9 nmol/L.
17-OH progesterone: Prepubertal 0.09–2.7 nmol/L, puberty Tanner II, III 0.3–3.9 nmol/L.
DHEA: 2–5 years 0.38–2.52 nmol/L, 6–10 years 0.9–5.3 nmol/L, puberty Tanner II, III 0.87–10.5 nmol/L.
Androstenedione: 1–10 years 0.18–1.78 nmol/L, puberty Tanner II, III 0.6–2.87 nmol/L.
Testosterone (total): 3–10 years 0.07–0.66 nmol/L, puberty Tanner II, III 0.63–11.2 nmol/L.
Testosterone (free): Prepubertal 0.52–2.0 pmol/L, adult male 180–971 pmol/L.
Gonadal function of Patient A measured at different interval from age 3 to 13 years old.
Figure 1Histology of the removed gonad. (A) Testis in low magnification: atrophic seminiferous tubules (1). Hyaline thickening of the basal membranes (2). Hyperplasia and clarification of the Leydig cells (3). (B) Testis in higher magnification: atrophic seminiferous tubules (1) containing Sertoli cells in the absence of spermatogonia. Lipid overload of the Leydig cells (2).
Patient B.
| Day 1 | 18.2 | 136 | 0.88 |
| Day 0 | 5.52 | 161 | 6.47 |
| Day 2 | 8.28 | 136 | 3.27 |
| Day 4 | 13.8 | 180 | 5.36 |
ACTH stimulation test: Injection of ACTH-Gel 25 IU/m.
Figure 2DNA sequencing. Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood of two patients, their two parents and a normal individual as control (A) using the Invitrogen DNAzol BD reagent. The seven exons of the STARD1 gene were PCR and sequenced. A mutation was found in exon 7. For exon 7 oligonucleotides used for PCR were (5′ to 3′) ATGAGCGTGTGTACCAGTGACG, (5′ to 3′) CCTGGCAGCCTGTTTGTGATAG; the annealing temperature was 60°C and the reaction processed for 30 cycles. The PCR products were sequenced. The mutation found in exon 7 was located at the amino acid residue 275, a leucine being substituted by a proline. The two parents (B,C) were +/−, and the two children (D,E) were −/−.
Figure 3STARD1 activity and quantification. COS-1 cells were cotransfected with the F2 construct (Harikrishna et al., 1993) (500 ng) and 200 ng pcDNA3.1 harboring the wild type (WT) human STARD1 cDNA. (WT STARD1-pcDNA3.1) or the mutant L275P STARD1-pcDNA3.1 and 300 ng of pcDNA3.1. Cells were incubated for 24 h. (A) 20 μg of whole cell homogenate were analyzed by immunoblotting. The membranes were exposed to anti- STARD1 antibody, followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Fleury et al., 2004). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with ECL Plus (Amersham Biosciences, U.K. Ltd., Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England) on a Storm 860 laser scanner instrument (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and the band intensity was quantified using ImageQuant software. (B) Pregnenolone from cell media was analyzed by radioimmunoassay (Fleury et al., 2004). Results are expressed as STARD1 activity/STARD1 quantity after background subtraction.
Figure 4Molecular model of STARD1 L275P mutation. (A) The essential elements of the wild-type STARD1 are shown. The salt bridge formed by Glu169/Arg188 putatively interacts with the β-OH of cholesterol, while the α-helix 4 is in a closed state. The line of hydrophobic residues Phe267/Leu271/Leu275 interacting with α-helix 2, Met225 and other hydrophobic residues (not shown for image simplicity) help stabilize the STARD1 /cholesterol complex. (B) The long hydrophobic side chain for Leu275 is absent in the clinical mutation L275P, thereby creates a void in the hydrophobic environment necessary for stabilizing holo- STARD1, leading to a reduction in cholesterol binding and steroidogenic activity (Roostaee et al., 2008). Initial coordinates for the molecular modeling of STARD1 were retrieved from the Protein Databank (code 1IMG). Site-directed mutagenesis and energy minimization were done in silico using the molecular modeling software SYBYL 8.0 (Tripos Inc, St. Louis, MO). All the rendering was done using PYMOL (DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 2002, DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA).
Figure 5Cellular model of steroidogenesis and LCAH. Low and high density lipoproteins (LDL and HDL) are captured by receptors on the cell membrane. Initial metabolism of LDL lipids occurs in the lysosome where cholesteryl esters are hydrolyzed by acidic cholesteryl ester hydrolases (acidic CEH). The resulting free cholesterol (Ch) is re-esterified by the cytosolic acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) and stored in lipid droplets. Cholesterol can also be synthesized de novo in the endoplasmic reticulum. In the resting cell, cholesterol is constantly hydrolyzed/re-esterified by neutral CEH and ACAT. With the help of lipid transporters, free cholesterol can be conveyed at the OMM. Then cholesterol present at the OMM can be transferred to the IMM for conversion to pregnenolone without STARD1. This low capacity system may explain the basal level of hormone production (10–13%) for homeostasis. Following an acute event (stress, dehydration, puberty, etc.), tropic hormones stimulate steroidogenic cells and activate PKA, which in turn leads to three actions: The activation of the hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) which releases cholesterol from lipid droplets, the de novo synthesis of STARD1, and the formation of a multiprotein complex (MPC) somehow involved in the transfer of cholesterol to the IMM (Liu et al., 2006; Bose et al., 2008a). Then STARD1 may act as a high capacity system by catalyzing the delivery of cholesterol to the OMM and the MPC complex for its transfer to P450scc in response to the acute demand for steroid hormones. In the case of LCAH, the STARD1 high capacity system is impaired cannot support the substantial throughput of cholesterol, and the latter accumulates in the cytosol; lipid droplets become engorged with cholesterol. As lipid droplets accumulate, the cell becomes less functional and LCAH is onset.