| Literature DB >> 27916915 |
María Martínez Pérez1, Guillermo Vázquez González2, Carlos Dafonte3.
Abstract
At present, one of the primary concerns of healthcare professionals is how to increase the safety and quality of the care that patients receive during their stay in hospital. This is particularly important in the administration of expensive and high-risk medicines with which it is fundamental to minimize the possibility of adverse events in the process of prescription-validation-preparation/dosage-dispensation-administration of intravenous mixes. This work is a detailed analysis of the evaluation, carried out by the health personnel involved in the Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) system developed in the Day Hospital and Pharmacy services of the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC). The RFID system is evaluated by analyzing surveys completed by said health personnel, since their questions represent the key indicators of the patient care process (safety, cost, adequacy with the clinical practice). This work allows us to conclude, among other things, that the system tracks the patients satisfactorily and that its cost, though high, is justified in the context of the project context (use of dangerous and costly medication).Entities:
Keywords: RFID; adverse events; evaluation; safety; traceability
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27916915 PMCID: PMC5191012 DOI: 10.3390/s16122031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Key parameters of an intravenous mixture.
| Key Parameters | |
|---|---|
| Patient data | Composition |
| Time of preparation | Pharmacist in charge |
| Despatch time | Stability |
| Health professional responsible for preparation | Special conditions for use |
| Previous medication | Rate of infusion |
| Lot number and date of expiry of components | Prepared medication |
Figure 1The functioning of RFID technology.
Comparison between Readers and RFID tags.
| Fixed Reader | Mobile Reader | Active Tags | Passive Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antenna | Tablet | Battery | No Battery |
| Arcs | PDA | More expensive | Less costly with less coverage |
| Access points | Mobile telephone | Greater size | Longer life |
Operational frequencies in RFID technology.
| Operational Frequency | Band |
|---|---|
| Low Frequency | Below 135 kHz |
| High Frequency | 13.56 MHz |
| Ultra-High Frequency | 433 MHz, 860 MHz and 928 MHz |
| Microwave | 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz |
Figure 2Tracking the preparation of the intravenous mixture.
RFID Systems which provide data for the indicators to evaluate.
| Indicators | RFID System for the Traceability of Patients and RFID Transporter Cart | RFID System for the Preparation of Medication in the Pharmacy Service | RFID System for Trucking Intravenous Mixtures | RFID System for the Administration of Medication to the Patient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | X | X | X | X |
| Traceability of patient | X | - | - | X |
| Traceability of medication | X | X | X | X |
| Usability | X | X | X | X |
| Efficiency | X | X | X | X |
| Cost | X | X | X | X |
| Suitability for routine clinical practice | X | X | X | X |
Figure 3Methodology for calculating the values of the indicators.
Thematic content of the questionnaires developed for each professional profile.
| Indicator/Questionnaire | Number of Questions | Safety | Traceability of Patients | Traceability of Medication | Usability | Efficiency | Cost | Suitability for Routine Clinical Practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | 8 | X | X | X | X | X | - | X |
| Doctor | 19 | X | X | X | X | X | - | X |
| Pharmicist specialising in hospital pharmacy | 36 | X | X | X | X | X | - | X |
| Nursing staff in the day hospital | 16 | X | X | X | X | X | - | X |
| Nursing staff in the hospital pharmacy | 14 | X | - | X | X | X | - | X |
| Computer personnel | 18 | X | - | - | X | X | - | X |
| Subdirector of hospital systems | 22 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Figure 4Global values of the analysed indicators with a radial graphic.
Figure 5Values of the Indicators analysed for each professional profile.
Figure 6Values of the indicators as analysed for the Deputy Head of hospital systems.