| Literature DB >> 27916868 |
Tim Kornfeld1,2, Peter M Vogt3, Vesna Bucan4, Claas-Tido Peck5, Kerstin Reimers6, Christine Radtke7.
Abstract
Nerve reconstruction of extended nerve defect injuries still remains challenging with respect to therapeutic options. The gold standard in nerve surgery is the autologous nerve graft. Due to the limitation of adequate donor nerves, surgical alternatives are needed. Nerve grafts made out of either natural or artificial materials represent this alternative. Several biomaterials are being explored and preclinical and clinical applications are ongoing. Unfortunately, nerve conduits with successful enhancement of axonal regeneration for nerve defects measuring over 4.0 cm are sparse and no conduits are available for nerve defects extending to 10.0 cm. In this study, spider silk nerve conduits seeded with Schwann cells were investigated for in vitro regeneration on defects measuring 4.0 cm, 10.0 cm and 15.0 cm in length. Schwann cells (SCs) were isolated, cultured and purified. Cell purity was determined by immunofluorescence. Nerve grafts were constructed out of spider silk from Nephila edulis and decellularized ovine vessels. Finally, spider silk implants were seeded with purified Schwann cells. Cell attachment was observed within the first hour. After 7 and 21 days of culture, immunofluorescence for viability and determination of Schwann cell proliferation and migration throughout the conduits was performed. Analyses revealed that SCs maintained viable (>95%) throughout the conduits independent of construct length. SC proliferation on the spider silk was determined from day 7 to day 21 with a proliferation index of 49.42% arithmetically averaged over all conduits. This indicates that spider silk nerve conduits represent a favorable environment for SC attachment, proliferation and distribution over a distance of least 15.0 cm in vitro. Thus spider silk nerve implants are a highly adequate biomaterial for nerve reconstruction.Entities:
Keywords: nerve graft; nerve surgery; reconstruction; spider silk
Year: 2016 PMID: 27916868 PMCID: PMC5197989 DOI: 10.3390/jfb7040030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1Nephila edulis and spider silk as an innovative biomaterial in nerve regeneration. (A) Nephila edulis; (B) Spider silk on 30.0 cm silk-collector; (C) 4.0 cm and (D) 15.0 cm spider silk nerve implant.
Figure 2Schwann cell (SC) culture during purification process in vitro. (A) Schwann cells in vitro in a subconfluent culture; (B) Staining of Schwann cells with characteristic marker S100 (green), counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The determined purity was 96.96%.
Figure 3Viability assay of spider silk nerve construct seeded with Schwann cells and cultured after 7 and 21 days of observation. Pre-settled spider silk nerve conduits were cultured for 7 and 21 days. Green cells are vital. Spider silk autofluorescence are shown orange-red. The number of cells increased by proliferation from day 7 to day 21 on a 4.0 cm construct (A,B). Diffuse population of Schwann cells on a 10.0 cm construct (C) increased during observation time of 21 days (D). On the 15.0 cm construct, at 7 days only a few SCs could be observed (E) but upon intense proliferation, the spider silk construct was fully populated with SC after 21 days (F). Cells are highly vital (green), indicative of sufficient nutritive substances in the central segments of the 15.0 cm spider silk nerve conduit. Scale bars in A–F pertain to 500 µm.