Literature DB >> 27916360

Combined resection and RFA in colorectal liver metastases: stratification of long-term outcomes.

Kazunari Sasaki1, Georgios A Margonis1, Nikolaos Andreatos1, Yuhree Kim1, Ana Wilson1, Faiz Gani1, Neda Amini1, Timothy M Pawlik2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation (resection-RFA) is a widely accepted multidisciplinary treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Worse prognosis after resection-RFA is correlated to tumor morphology, although unfavorable morphology is inherent to this patient cohort. This study aimed to select patients who may or may not benefit from resection-RFA with the aid of tumor biology.
METHOD: Data from 485 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy with or without concurrent RFA were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Clinicopathologic characteristics, predictors of overall survival (OS), and OS of patients stratified by tumor biology in resection-RFA were analyzed.
RESULTS: Combined resection-RFA was performed in 86 patients (17.7%) and a standalone resection in 399 patients. Baseline patients' characteristics of the resection-RFA group were significantly different in terms of median number of tumors (5 versus 2) and bilobar distribution (84.9% versus 29.1%) from those of the resection-only group. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of decreased OS in the resection-RFA group. Three were related to tumor biology: primary tumor nodal metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 2.32; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-4.64], Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog mutation (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.36-5.14), and preoperative high carcinoembryonic antigen (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.13-4.81), and one related to tumor morphology-ablated lesions ≥3 (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.41-3.80; P = 0.023). To examine the prognostic influence of tumor biology, the resection-RFA group was stratified into two groups by number of predictors related to tumor biology (low risk: 0-1 risk factors; n = 56 and high risk: 2-3 risk factors; n = 30). Median OS of the low risk, high risk, and resection-alone groups were 61.8, 20.7, and 75.3 mo, respectively. The 5-y OS rate was similar between the low risk and resection-alone group (52.7% versus 58.7%, respectively; P = 0.323).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk tumors undergoing a combined resection-RFA approach had roughly comparable OS to those who only underwent resection, irrespective of advanced tumor morphology. Combined resection-RFA procedures might be of value to these patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer liver metastases; Hepatectomy; RFA; Radiofrequency ablation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27916360     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  9 in total

1.  Combined liver resection and radiofrequency ablation for bilobar multiple colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Jeong-Ik Park
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

2.  Surgical Resection plus Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation versus Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Preserved Liver Function: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Gun Ha Kim; Jin Hyoung Kim; Heung Kyu Ko; Hee Ho Chu; Seong Ho Kim; Ji Hoon Shin; Dong Il Gwon; Gi-Young Ko; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Ki-Hun Kim; Ju Hyun Shim; Nayoung Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Repeating of local therapy of distant metastases increases overall survival in patients with synchronous metastasized rectal cancer-a monocentric analysis.

Authors:  Marlen Haderlein; Sebastian Lettmaier; Melanie Langheinrich; Axel Schmid; Sabine Semrau; Markus Hecht; Michael Beck; Daniela Schmidt; Robert Grützmann; Rainer Fietkau; Axel Denz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Surgical resection plus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Cheng Zhou; Yuanfei Peng; Kaiqian Zhou; Lan Zhang; Xiangyu Zhang; Lei Yu; Jie Hu; Feiyu Chen; Shuangjian Qiu; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Zhenggang Ren; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Non-response to preoperative chemotherapy is a contraindication to hepatectomy plus radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Rui Mao; Jian-Jun Zhao; Hong Zhao; Ye-Fan Zhang; Xin-Yu Bi; Zhi-Yu Li; Jian-Guo Zhou; Xiao-Long Wu; Chen Xiao; Jian-Qiang Cai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 6.  Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation Compared to Systemic Chemotherapy and to Partial Hepatectomy in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Martijn R Meijerink; Robbert S Puijk; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Kirsten Holdt Henningsen; Llenalia Garcia Fernandez; Mattias Neyt; Juanita Heymans; Jacqueline S Frankema; Koert P de Jong; Dick J Richel; Warner Prevoo; Joan Vlayen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Image-Guided Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Principles, Current Evidence, and the Path Forward.

Authors:  Yuan-Mao Lin; Iwan Paolucci; Kristy K Brock; Bruno C Odisio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  MRI-guided percutaneous thermoablation in combination with hepatic resection as parenchyma-sparing approach in patients with primary and secondary hepatic malignancies: single center long-term experience.

Authors:  Moritz T Winkelmann; Rami Archid; Georg Gohla; Gerald Hefferman; Jens Kübler; Jakob Weiss; Stephan Clasen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Silvio Nadalin; Rüdiger Hoffmann
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiang Fan; Shu-Yi Lv; Mei-Wu Zhang; Xiao-Yu Dai; Jian-Pei Zhao; Da-Feng Mao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.253

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.