Literature DB >> 27916269

Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.

Sarah E Gill1, Michaela E McGree2, Amy L Weaver2, William A Cliby1, Carrie L Langstraat3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To: a) identify prognostic factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS), and b) compare post-surgical survival between patients treated with NACT/IDS for presumed unresectable disease and stage IIIC/IV patients who underwent suboptimal primary debulking surgery (PDS).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive stage IIIC or IV patients undergoing IDS after NACT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2013. A subset of patients receiving NACT/IDS for the indication of unresectable disease were matched 1:1 on age and stage to a cohort of patients who underwent suboptimal PDS between 2003 and 2011. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: We identified 87 patients treated with NACT/IDS: the median OS and PFS following surgery was 2.4 and 1.0years, respectively. Factors associated with significantly worse OS were older age (adjusted HR 1.60 per 10-year increase in age, 95% CI 1.18, 2.16) and elevated CA-125 before IDS (adjusted HR 2.30 for CA-125 >35U/mL, 95% CI 1.25, 4.23). Number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles administered did not have a significant effect on survival. In the matched cohort analysis of presumed unresectable cases undergoing NACT/IDS vs suboptimal PDS cases (n=45 each), the NACT/IDS group had a significant OS advantage (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32, 0.88), and fewer patients experienced a 30-day postoperative Accordion grade 3/4 complication (11% vs 36%, P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and normalization of CA-125 prior to IDS are associated with improved survival with NACT/IDS. For primary EOC where resection to residual disease of 1cm or less is unlikely, NACT/IDS is associated with improved survival and reduced perioperative morbidity compared to PDS. As these patients are likely best served by NACT/IDS, more reliable predictors of resectability would be valuable.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interval debulking surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Unresectable

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27916269     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  14 in total

1.  Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hiroko Machida; Hideki Tokunaga; Koji Matsuo; Noriomi Matsumura; Yoichi Kobayashi; Tsutomu Tabata; Masanori Kaneuchi; Satoru Nagase; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Anna E Austin; Ryan P Hickson; Matthew S Dixon; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Compliance to treatment guidelines and survival in women undergoing interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Thumkur S Shylasree; Abhay K Kattepur; Monisha Gupta; Jaya Ghosh; Amita Maheshwari; Jyoti Bajpai; Rohini Hawaldar; Seema Gulia; Kedar Deodhar; Palak Popat; Sudeep Gupta; Rajendra A Kerkar
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-10-03

Review 4.  Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cummings; Olivia Nicolais; Mark Shahin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

5.  A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience.

Authors:  Eleonora Ghisoni; Dionyssios Katsaros; Furio Maggiorotto; Massimo Aglietta; Marco Vaira; Michele De Simone; Gloria Mittica; Gaia Giannone; Manuela Robella; Sofia Genta; Fabiola Lucchino; Francesco Marocco; Fulvio Borella; Giorgio Valabrega; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.

Authors:  Borut Kobal; Marco Noventa; Branko Cvjeticanin; Matija Barbic; Leon Meglic; Marusa Herzog; Giulia Bordi; Amerigo Vitagliano; Carlo Saccardi; Erik Skof
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Tian Gao; Xiao-Xin Huang; Wu-Yun Wang; Miao-Fang Wu; Zhong-Qiu Lin; Jing Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  GDF15 predict platinum response during first-line chemotherapy and can act as a complementary diagnostic serum biomarker with CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Xiaobing Wang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Novel Molecular Targets for Tumor-Specific Imaging of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Metastases.

Authors:  Lysanne D A N de Muynck; Katja N Gaarenstroom; Cornelis F M Sier; Maurice van Duijvenvoorde; Tjalling Bosse; J Sven D Mieog; Cornelis D de Kroon; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Inge T A Peters
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Kinetics of HE4 and CA125 as prognosis biomarkers during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jorge A Alegría-Baños; José C Jiménez-López; Arely Vergara-Castañeda; David F Cantú de León; Alejandro Mohar-Betancourt; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Gisela Sánchez-Domínguez; Mariana García-Villarejo; César Olivares-Pérez; Ángel Hernández-Constantino; Acitlalin González-Santiago; Miguel Clara-Altamirano; Liz Arela-Quispe; Diddier Prada-Ortega
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.