Literature DB >> 27916188

Editorial Commentary: Renaissance of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: Is History Repeating Itself?

Erik Hohmann.   

Abstract

In a comparative Level III study, Achtnich et al. compared suture anchor repair of acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament avulsion tears with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadrupled semitendinosus tendon. Short-term follow-up at a mean of 28 months showed that the between-group differences were not different. These results are encouraging but not different from other published series 25+ years ago. Only time will tell whether the long-term outcomes are identical and whether these techniques will also die a slow death. Hopefully history is not repeating itself.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27916188     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  3 in total

1.  Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Review of Recent Literature (2016-2017).

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-05

2.  Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harmen D Vermeijden; Inger N Sierevelt; Gregory S DiFelice; Arthur van Noort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A systematic review of long-term patient reported outcomes for the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the skeletally immature.

Authors:  C Buckle; A M Wainwright
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.