Literature DB >> 27915458

ACL deficiency and varus osteoarthritis: high tibial osteotomy alone or combined with ACL reconstruction?

Julian Mehl1, Jochen Paul2, Matthias J Feucht3, Gerrit Bode3, Andreas B Imhoff4, Norbert P Südkamp3, Stefan Hinterwimmer5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the mid- to long-term clinical and radiological outcome in patients with symptomatic varus osteoarthritis (OA) and deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and analyzes whether there are differences between isolated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or combined single-stage HTO and ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
METHODS: 26 patients who underwent HTO alone (group 1) and 26 patients who underwent single-stage HTO and ACLR (group 2) because of varus OA and ACL deficiency were examined at a mean of 5.8 years (SD 3.6 years) post-operatively. Assessment at follow-up (FU) was performed using a questionnaire including clinical scores (Lysholm, IKDC) and the KT-2000 arthrometer to examine anterior knee stability. Radiographic knee alignment and signs of OA according to the classification of Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) were assessed pre-operatively and at FU.
RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of all patients reported an improvement of pain and 79% an improvement of instability without significant group difference. Significant worse results were observed in group 1 for the Lysholm score (group 1: 69.4, SD 15.7; group 2: 78.3, SD 16.4; p = 0.020) and the IKDC score (group 1: 64.8, SD 13.0; group 2: 74.0, SD 15.6; p = 0.006). No group difference was found for the KT-2000 examination. A significant post-operative increase of radiographic OA could be seen in both groups without significant group difference (KL pre-operative: 2.3, SD 0.63; KL FU: 2.8, SD 0.74; p < 0.001). The radiographic leg alignment at FU showed a significant lower valgus alignment in group 1 (group 1: 0.4 degree, SD 3.3 degree; group 2: 2.1 degree, SD 2.1 degree; p = 0.039). The rate of post-operative complications was low with 4%, and no significant group differences were found.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that HTO alone can improve pain and even subjective knee stability. Additional ACLR was in the mid term not associated with a higher increase of OA or a higher rate of post-operative complications in our study collective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anterior instability; HTO; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Varus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27915458     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2604-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  Excellent long-term results in combined high tibial osteotomy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and chondral resurfacing in patients with severe osteoarthritis and varus alignment.

Authors:  Philipp Schuster; Michael Schlumberger; Philipp Mayer; Martin Eichinger; Markus Geßlein; Martin Schulz-Jahrsdörfer; Jörg Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Indications and outcomes of simultaneous high tibial osteotomy and ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Devon Stride; Julian Wang; Nolan S Horner; Bashar Alolabi; Vickas Khanna; Moin Khan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Yong-Beom Park; Dong-Hyun Kim; Nicolas Pujol; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Is there any benefit in the combined ligament reconstruction with osteotomy compared to ligament reconstruction or osteotomy alone?: Comparative outcome analysis according to the degree of medial compartment osteoarthritis with anterior or posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Authors:  Joo Sung Kim; Sung Bae Park; Han Gyeol Choi; Ho Won Jeong; Seung Jae Shim; Yong Seuk Lee
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 5.  Considerations of the Posterior Tibial Slope in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ehab M Nazzal; Bálint Zsidai; Oriol Pujol; Janina Kaarre; Andrew J Curley; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 6.  The clinical Outcome of One-stage High Tibial Osteotomy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. A Current Concept Systematic and Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Omid Shahpari; Maria-Kyriaki Kaseta
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-05

7.  Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or Revision.

Authors:  Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Federico Dettoni; Anna Palazzolo; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-10-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.