Laura Leuchs1, Max Schneider1, Michael Czisch1, Victor I Spoormaker2. 1. Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany. 2. Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: spoormaker@psych.mpg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fear conditioning and extinction are prevailing experimental and etiological models for normal and pathological anxiety. Pupil dilations in response to conditioned stimuli are increasingly used as a robust psychophysiological readout of fear learning, but their neural correlates remain unknown. We aimed at identifying the neural correlates of pupil responses to threat and safety cues during a fear learning task. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy subjects underwent a fear conditioning and extinction paradigm with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and pupillometry. After a stringent preprocessing and artifact rejection procedure, trial-wise pupil responses to threat and safety cues were entered as parametric modulations to the fMRI general linear models. RESULTS: Trial-wise magnitude of pupil responses to both conditioned and safety stimuli correlated positively with activity in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), thalamus, supramarginal gyrus and insula for the entire fear learning task, and with activity in the dACC during the fear conditioning phase in particular. Phasic pupil responses did not show habituation, but were negatively correlated with tonic baseline pupil diameter, which decreased during the task. Correcting phasic pupil responses for the tonic baseline pupil diameter revealed thalamic activity, which was also observed in an analysis employing a linear (declining) time modulation. CONCLUSION: Pupil dilations during fear conditioning and extinction provide useful readouts to track fear learning on a trial-by-trial level, particularly with simultaneous fMRI. Whereas phasic pupil responses reflect activity in brain regions involved in fear learning and threat appraisal, most prominently in dACC, tonic changes in pupil diameter may reflect changes in general arousal.
BACKGROUND: Fear conditioning and extinction are prevailing experimental and etiological models for normal and pathological anxiety. Pupil dilations in response to conditioned stimuli are increasingly used as a robust psychophysiological readout of fear learning, but their neural correlates remain unknown. We aimed at identifying the neural correlates of pupil responses to threat and safety cues during a fear learning task. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy subjects underwent a fear conditioning and extinction paradigm with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and pupillometry. After a stringent preprocessing and artifact rejection procedure, trial-wise pupil responses to threat and safety cues were entered as parametric modulations to the fMRI general linear models. RESULTS: Trial-wise magnitude of pupil responses to both conditioned and safety stimuli correlated positively with activity in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), thalamus, supramarginal gyrus and insula for the entire fear learning task, and with activity in the dACC during the fear conditioning phase in particular. Phasic pupil responses did not show habituation, but were negatively correlated with tonic baseline pupil diameter, which decreased during the task. Correcting phasic pupil responses for the tonic baseline pupil diameter revealed thalamic activity, which was also observed in an analysis employing a linear (declining) time modulation. CONCLUSION: Pupil dilations during fear conditioning and extinction provide useful readouts to track fear learning on a trial-by-trial level, particularly with simultaneous fMRI. Whereas phasic pupil responses reflect activity in brain regions involved in fear learning and threat appraisal, most prominently in dACC, tonic changes in pupil diameter may reflect changes in general arousal.
Authors: Patricia Pais-Roldán; Kengo Takahashi; Filip Sobczak; Yi Chen; Xiaoning Zhao; Hang Zeng; Yuanyuan Jiang; Xin Yu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michelle I C de Haan; Sonja van Well; Renée M Visser; H Steven Scholte; Guido A van Wingen; Merel Kindt Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Claire Gao; Yan Leng; Jun Ma; Victoria Rooke; Shakira Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Charu Ramakrishnan; Karl Deisseroth; Mario A Penzo Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Julia Fietz; Dorothee Pöhlchen; Florian P Binder; Michael Czisch; Philipp G Sämann; Victor I Spoormaker Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Tanja M Brückl; Victor I Spoormaker; Philipp G Sämann; Anna-Katharine Brem; Lara Henco; Darina Czamara; Immanuel Elbau; Norma C Grandi; Lee Jollans; Anne Kühnel; Laura Leuchs; Dorothee Pöhlchen; Maximilian Schneider; Alina Tontsch; Martin E Keck; Leonhard Schilbach; Michael Czisch; Susanne Lucae; Angelika Erhardt; Elisabeth B Binder Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.630