Literature DB >> 27915096

Universal contact precautions do not change the prevalence of antibiotic resistant organisms in a tertiary burn unit.

Adelyn L Ho1, Reid Chambers2, Claudia Malic2, Anthony Papp3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms (ARO) in burn units is increasing worldwide and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. Study aims are to describe the burden of AROs in burn patients admitted to a tertiary burn unit, to evaluate the impact of contact precautions implemented after an outbreak of antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and to identify possible predictors of ARO acquisition.
METHODS: Data of burn inpatients between 2006 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of ARO colonization/infection at or after admission were reviewed in detail. Organisms of interest included: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed with the p-value set at 0.05.
RESULTS: Complete data analysis was available for 340 patients. The mean age was 41.8 years with male predominance. Among the AROs, the most prevalent was MRSA from clinical specimens. Prior to contact precaution implementation, the prevalence of all AROs was 27.9%, compared to 27.6% afterwards. There was an increase in Pseudomonas and VRE isolates and a disappearance of Acinetobacter. The most common isolate sites were the burn wounds. ICU stay, burns >20% TBSA, and surgical management were significant predictors of ARO acquisition.
CONCLUSION: This study describes the ARO profile of burn patients admitted to a tertiary burn unit. The results suggest that implementation of unit-wide contact precautions may not significantly reduce the frequency of AROs among burn patients. Contact precautions for patients transferred from the ICU, undergoing surgery, and large burns may be of benefit. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic-resistant organisms; Burns; Colonization; Contact precautions; Infection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27915096     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  Long-Term Impact of Universal Contact Precautions on Rates of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in ICUs: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  E Yoko Furuya; Bevin Cohen; Haomiao Jia; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Infection control in german-speaking burn centres: results of an online survey.

Authors:  C Baier; R Ipaktchi; E Ebadi; H-O Rennekampff; H-M Just; P M Vogt; F-C Bange; K Suchodolski
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-09-30

3.  Patterns of multidrug resistant organism acquisition in an adult specialist burns service: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Heather Cleland; Lincoln M Tracy; Alex Padiglione; Andrew J Stewardson
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.454

4.  Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals.

Authors:  Mariana Sanches de Mello; Adriana Cristina Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2021-04-09

5.  Extensive colonization with carbapenemase-producing microorganisms in Romanian burn patients: infectious consequences from the Colectiv fire disaster.

Authors:  L E Pirii; A W Friedrich; J W A Rossen; W Vogels; G I J M Beerthuizen; M K Nieuwenhuis; A M D Kooistra-Smid; E Bathoorn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.