Literature DB >> 27915080

A nudge in a healthier direction: How environmental cues help restrained eaters pursue their weight-control goal.

Aline E Stämpfli1, Sabrina Stöckli2, Thomas A Brunner3.   

Abstract

Losing weight is a goal for many people, but it is hard to pursue. However, dieting cues in the environment hold promise for improving individuals' eating behavior. For example, exposure to thin, human-like sculptures by the artist Alberto Giacometti has been found to promote healthy snack choices at a vending machine. Whether health- or weight-related processes drive such effects has not yet been determined. However, a detailed understanding of the content-related drivers of environmental cues' effects provides the first indications regarding a cue's possible use. Therefore, two laboratory studies were conducted. They examined the Giacometti sculptures' effects on unhealthy and healthy food intake (Study 1) and on the completion of weight- and health-related fragmented words (Study 2). Study 1 indicated that the sculptures are weight-related by showing that they reduced food intake independent of food healthiness. Furthermore, the "Giacometti effect" was moderated by restrained eating. Restrained eaters, who are known for their weight-control goal, ate less after having been exposed to the thin sculptures. The results of Study 2 pointed in the same direction. Restrained eaters completed more weight-related words after being exposed to the sculptures. Overall, these studies suggest that the thin sculptures are primarily weight-related cues and particularly helpful for restrained eaters. Environmental weight-control cues such as the Giacometti sculptures could act as a counterforce to our obesogenic environment and help restrained eaters pursue their weight-control goal. In this way, they could nudge food decisions in a healthier direction.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dieting; Environmental cue; Nudging; Restrained eating; Weight-control goal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27915080     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  6 in total

1.  Examination of Protein Quantity and Protein Distribution across the Day on Ad Libitum Carbohydrate and Fat Intake in Overweight Women.

Authors:  Jess A Gwin; Kevin C Maki; Ammar Y Alwattar; Heather J Leidy
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2017-10-25

2.  Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola J Buckland; Vanessa Er; Ian Redpath; Kristine Beaulieu
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Calorie information and dieting status modulate reward and control activation during the evaluation of food images.

Authors:  Andrea L Courtney; Emma K PeConga; Dylan D Wagner; Kristina M Rapuano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Novel Methodological Considerations Regarding the Use of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Appetite Questionnaires in Tightly Controlled Feeding Trials.

Authors:  Steve M Douglas; Heather J Leidy
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-05-02

5.  A Consumer Segmentation Study of Nutrition Information Seeking and Its Relation to Food Consumption in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yin Wang; Jiayou Wang; Qiong Shen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-03

6.  Cafeteria Online: Nudges for Healthier Food Choices in a University Cafeteria-A Randomized Online Experiment.

Authors:  Christine Kawa; Patrizia M Ianiro-Dahm; Jan F H Nijhuis; Wim H Gijselaers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.