Literature DB >> 27915070

Vicarious ratings of social touch reflect the anatomical distribution & velocity tuning of C-tactile afferents: A hedonic homunculus?

Susannah C Walker1, Paula D Trotter2, Andy Woods3, Francis McGlone4.   

Abstract

A subclass of C-fibres, C-tactile afferents (CTs), have been discovered which respond preferentially to low force/velocity stroking touch, that is typically perceived as pleasant. Molecular genetic visualization of these low-threshold mechanosensitive C-fibres (CLTMs) in mice revealed a denser distribution in dorsal than ventral thoracic sites, scattered distal limb innervation and a complete absence from glabrous paw skin (Liu et al., 2007). Here we used third-party ratings to examine whether affective responses to social touch reflect the anatomical distribution and velocity tuning of CTs. Participants viewed and rated a sequence of video clips depicting one individual being touched by another at different skin sites and at 3 different velocities (static, 3cm/s, 30cm/s). Immediately after viewing each clip participants were asked to rate how pleasant they perceived the touch to be. Vicarious preferences matched the previously reported anatomical innervation density of rodent CLTMs, with touch on the back being rated significantly more pleasant than any other location. Furthermore, in contrast to all other skin sites, CT optimal (3cm/s) touch on the palm of the hand was not preferred to static touch, consistent with the anatomical absence of CTs in glabrous skin. Our findings demonstrate that humans recognise the specific rewarding value of CT optimal caressing touch and their preferences reflect the hypothesised anatomical distribution of CTs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affect; C-tactile afferent; Homunculus; Social; Touch

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27915070     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Defining pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Håkan Olausson; Mats Trulsson; Peter Svensson; Lene Baad-Hansen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-19

2.  Effects of MDMA on attention to positive social cues and pleasantness of affective touch.

Authors:  Anya K Bershad; Leah M Mayo; Kathryne Van Hedger; Francis McGlone; Susannah C Walker; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Socio-affective touch expression database.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Hans Op de Beeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The multidimensional representational space of observed socio-affective touch experiences.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Stien Van De Plas; Nicky Daniels; Hans Op de Beeck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Validation and psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Touch Experiences and Attitudes Questionnaire (TEAQ-37 Rus).

Authors:  Paula Trotter; Elena Belovol; Francis McGlone; Anton Varlamov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dynamic touch reduces physiological arousal in preterm infants: A role for c-tactile afferents?

Authors:  Andrea Manzotti; Francesco Cerritelli; Jorge E Esteves; Gianluca Lista; Erica Lombardi; Simona La Rocca; Alberto Gallace; Francis P McGlone; Susannah C Walker
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Heterosexual, gay, and lesbian people's reactivity to virtual caresses on their embodied avatars' taboo zones.

Authors:  Martina Fusaro; Matteo P Lisi; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Children's vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress.

Authors:  Connor J Haggarty; Paula D Trotter; Francis McGlone; Susannah C Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Affective touch topography and body image.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Sofia Sacchetti; Shelby Shin; Adarsh Makdani; Paula D Trotter; Francis McGlone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intact neural representations of affective meaning of touch but lack of embodied resonance in autism: a multi-voxel pattern analysis study.

Authors:  Hans Op de Beeck; Bart Boets; Haemy Lee Masson; Ineke Pillet; Steffie Amelynck; Stien Van De Plas; Michelle Hendriks
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 7.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.