Literature DB >> 27914839

Late In-the-Bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Lens Repositioning and Lens Exchange.

Olav Kristianslund1, Marianne Råen2, Atle E Østern2, Liv Drolsum3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 operation methods for late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel-group surgical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred to Oslo University Hospital (tertiary referral center).
METHODS: We randomly assigned 104 patients (104 eyes) either to IOL repositioning by scleral suturing (n = 54) or to IOL exchange with retropupillary fixation of an iris-claw IOL (n = 50). One surgeon performed all operations. Patients were evaluated comprehensively before surgery, and most patients (82%) attended an examination 6 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean postoperative BCVA was 0.24±0.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (range, -0.18 to 1.16 logMAR) in the repositioning group and 0.35±0.54 logMAR (range, -0.20 to 3.0 logMAR) in the exchange group (P = 0.23). A BCVA of 20/40 or better (Snellen) was reached by 61% and 62% of the patients, respectively (P = 0.99). The mean postoperative corneal cylinder was 1.2±1.0 and 1.2±0.8 diopters, respectively (P = 0.84), and the postoperative endothelial cell density changes were -3±10% (P = 0.07) and -10±14% (P = 0.001), respectively (group difference, P = 0.04). Repositioning had a longer mean surgical time than exchange (P < 0.001). There were 2 (4%) and 0 cases of perioperative fluid misdirection syndrome, respectively. Postoperative complications were intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (n = 12), cystoid macular edema (CME; n = 3), and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (n = 1) in the repositioning group, and IOP increase (n = 9), pupillary block (n = 1), choroidal effusion (n = 2), CME (n = 4), and redislocation (n = 1) in the exchange group.
CONCLUSIONS: We found satisfactory and not significantly different outcomes for BCVA 6 months after surgery in the 2 groups. Both operation methods seemed safe, with low frequencies of serious perioperative and postoperative complications. However, some of the observed differences in complications should be taken into consideration when selecting the most suitable method in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914839     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  18 in total

1.  Complications and outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with artisan aphakia intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Rong-Mei Peng; Yu-Xin Guo; Yuan Qiu; Yan-Sheng Hao; Jing Hong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Corneal endothelial status in different grades of late spontaneous in-the-bag IOL dislocation.

Authors:  Renata Vaiciuliene; Vytautas Jasinskas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Efficacy of haptic sutured in-the-bag intraocular lens for intraocular lens-capsule complex stability: a comparison of three insertion methods.

Authors:  Yang Kyung Cho; Andrew Thomson; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Outcomes of a new suture technique for the treatment of dislocated intraocular lenses: locked loop on the haptic.

Authors:  Ugur Unsal; Berkay Akmaz; Deniz Kilic
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Refractive errors after sutureless intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens.

Authors:  Masato Kakisu; Takayuki Baba; Tomoaki Tatsumi; Takehito Iwase; Tomohiro Nizawa; Gen Miura; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Calculation of iris-claw IOL power for correction of late in-the-bag IOL complex dislocation.

Authors:  Valentín Huerva; Francisco J Ascaso; Isabel Caral; Andrzej Grzybowski
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Comparisons of Visual and Surgical Outcomes after Reuse or Replacement of Dislocated in-the-Bag Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Takayuki Baba; Tomohiro Nizawa; Toshiyuki Oshitari; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparative analysis of retropupillary iris claw versus scleral-fixated intraocular lens in the management of post-cataract aphakia.

Authors:  Nivean Madhivanan; Sabyasachi Sengupta; Manavi Sindal; Pratheeba Devi Nivean; Maitri Arun Kumar; Murali Ariga
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Surgical management of intraocular lens dislocation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shangfei Yang; Kailai Nie; Hui Jiang; Liwen Feng; Wei Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Long-Term Suture Breakage After Scleral Fixation of a Modified Capsular Tension Ring with Polypropylene 10-0 Suture.

Authors:  Olav Kristianslund; Gunhild F Sandvik; Liv Drolsum
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.