Literature DB >> 27914822

Effects of sodium thiosulfate versus observation on development of cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children with cancer (ACCL0431): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

David R Freyer1, Lu Chen2, Mark D Krailo3, Kristin Knight4, Doojduen Villaluna2, Bonnie Bliss2, Brad H Pollock5, Jagadeesh Ramdas6, Beverly Lange7, David Van Hoff8, Michele L VanSoelen8, John Wiernikowski9, Edward A Neuwelt4, Lillian Sung10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium thiosulfate is an antioxidant shown in preclinical studies in animals to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss with timed administration after cisplatin without compromising the antitumour efficacy of cisplatin. The primary aim of this study was to assess sodium thiosulfate for prevention of cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and adolescents.
METHODS: ACCL0431 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled participants at 38 participating Children's Oncology Group hospitals in the USA and Canada. Eligible participants aged 1-18 years with newly diagnosed cancer and normal audiometry were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sodium thiosulfate or observation (control group) in addition to their planned cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen, using permuted blocks of four. Randomisation was initially stratified by age and duration of cisplatin infusion. Stratification by previous cranial irradiation was added later as a protocol amendment. The allocation sequence was computer-generated centrally and concealed to all personnel. Participants received sodium thiosulfate 16 g/m2 intravenously 6 h after each cisplatin dose or observation. The primary endpoint was incidence of hearing loss 4 weeks after final cisplatin dose. Hearing was measured using standard audiometry and reviewed centrally by audiologists masked to allocation using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria but treatment was not masked for participants or clinicians. Analysis of the primary endpoint was by modified intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned patients irrespective of treatment received but restricted to those assessable for hearing loss. Enrolment is complete and this report represents the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00716976.
FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2008, and Sept 28, 2012, 125 eligible participants were randomly assigned to either sodium thiosulfate (n=61) or observation (n=64). Of these, 104 participants were assessable for the primary endpoint (sodium thiosulfate, n=49; control, n=55). Hearing loss was identified in 14 (28·6%; 95% CI 16·6-43·3) participants in the sodium thiosulfate group compared with 31 (56·4%; 42·3-69·7) in the control group (p=0·00022). Adjusted for stratification variables, the likelihood of hearing loss was significantly lower in the sodium thiosulfate group compared with the control group (odds ratio 0·31, 95% CI 0·13-0·73; p=0·0036). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events reported, irrespective of attribution, were neutropenia (117 [66%] of 177 participant cycles in the sodium thiosulfate group vs 145 [65%] of 223 in the control group), whereas the most common non-haematological adverse event was hypokalaemia (25 [17%] of 147 vs 22 [12%] of 187). Of 194 serious adverse events reported in 26 participants who had received sodium thiosulfate, none were deemed probably or definitely related to sodium thiosulfate; the most common serious adverse event was decreased neutrophil count: 26 episodes in 14 participants.
INTERPRETATION: Sodium thiosulfate protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and is not associated with serious adverse events attributed to its use. Further research is needed to define the appropriate role for sodium thiosulfate among emerging otoprotection strategies. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914822      PMCID: PMC5520988          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30625-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  23 in total

1.  Prevention of hearing loss in children receiving cisplatin chemotherapy.

Authors:  David R Freyer; Lillian Sung; Gregory H Reaman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Interaction of cisplatin and carboplatin with sodium thiosulfate: reaction rates and protein binding.

Authors:  F Elferink; W J van der Vijgh; I Klein; H M Pinedo
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Protection against cisplatin-induced toxicities by N-acetylcysteine and sodium thiosulfate as assessed at the molecular, cellular, and in vivo levels.

Authors:  D Thomas Dickey; Y Jeffrey Wu; Leslie L Muldoon; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 4.  Platinum-induced ototoxicity in children: a consensus review on mechanisms, predisposition, and protection, including a new International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston ototoxicity scale.

Authors:  Penelope R Brock; Kristin R Knight; David R Freyer; Kathleen C M Campbell; Peter S Steyger; Brian W Blakley; Shahrad R Rassekh; Kay W Chang; Brian J Fligor; Kaukab Rajput; Michael Sullivan; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effect of sodium thiosulfate on cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) toxicity and antitumor activity in L1210 leukemia.

Authors:  S B Howell; R Taetle
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1980 Apr-May

6.  Amifostine does not prevent platinum-induced hearing loss associated with the treatment of children with hepatoblastoma: a report of the Intergroup Hepatoblastoma Study P9645 as a part of the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Howard M Katzenstein; Kay W Chang; Mark Krailo; Zhengjia Chen; Milton J Finegold; Jon Rowland; Marleta Reynolds; Alberto Pappo; Wendy B London; Marcio Malogolowkin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  First evidence of otoprotection against carboplatin-induced hearing loss with a two-compartment system in patients with central nervous system malignancy using sodium thiosulfate.

Authors:  E A Neuwelt; R E Brummett; N D Doolittle; L L Muldoon; R A Kroll; M A Pagel; R Dojan; V Church; L G Remsen; J S Bubalo
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Sodium thiosulfate administered six hours after cisplatin does not compromise antineuroblastoma activity.

Authors:  Theresa M Harned; Ondrej Kalous; Alexander Neuwelt; Jason Loera; Lingyun Ji; Peter Iovine; Richard Sposto; Edward A Neuwelt; C Patrick Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lloyd Kelland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Analysis of risk factors for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in patients with testicular cancer.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; C C Berger; J T Hartmann; C Kollmannsberger; H J Schmoll; M A Kuczyk; L Kanz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Clinical trials evaluating transtympanic otoprotectants for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: what do we know so far?

Authors:  Sofia Waissbluth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Clinical and Genome-Wide Analysis of Serum Platinum Levels after Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew R Trendowski; Omar El-Charif; Mark J Ratain; Patrick Monahan; Zepeng Mu; Heather E Wheeler; Paul C Dinh; Darren R Feldman; Shirin Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard; Robert J Hamilton; David J Vaughn; Chunkit Fung; Christian Kollmannsberger; Taisei Mushiroda; Michiaki Kubo; Robyn Hannigan; Frederick Strathmann; Lawrence H Einhorn; Sophie D Fossa; Lois B Travis; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Development of Second-Generation CDK2 Inhibitors for the Prevention of Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Robert A Hazlitt; Tal Teitz; Justine D Bonga; Jie Fang; Shiyong Diao; Luigi Iconaru; Lei Yang; Asli N Goktug; Duane G Currier; Taosheng Chen; Zoran Rankovic; Jaeki Min; Jian Zuo
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Role of interventional radiology in managing pediatric liver tumors : Part 1: Endovascular interventions.

Authors:  Matthew P Lungren; Alexander J Towbin; Derek J Roebuck; Eric J Monroe; Anne E Gill; Avnesh Thakor; Richard B Towbin; Anne Marie Cahill; C Matthew Hawkins
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-01-23

Review 5.  Aminoglycoside- and Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity: Mechanisms and Otoprotective Strategies.

Authors:  Corné J Kros; Peter S Steyger
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 6.  Mechanisms of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity and Prevention.

Authors:  Leonard P Rybak; Debashree Mukherjea; Vickram Ramkumar
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2019-04-26

7.  Prevention of cisplatin-induced hearing loss by extended release fluticasone propionate intracochlear implants.

Authors:  Erik Pierstorff; Wan-Wan Yang; Yen-Jung Angel Chen; Shirley Cheung; Federico Kalinec; William H Slattery
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Medical interventions for the prevention of platinum-induced hearing loss in children with cancer.

Authors:  Jorrit W van As; Henk van den Berg; Elvira C van Dalen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-07

9.  The Development of a Nano-based Approach to Alleviate Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.

Authors:  Mohammad N Kayyali; Andrew J Ramsey; Elizabeth M Higbee-Dempsey; Lesan Yan; Bert W O'Malley; Andrew Tsourkas; Daqing Li
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-18

Review 10.  Prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children and adolescents with cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  David R Freyer; Penelope R Brock; Kay W Chang; L Lee Dupuis; Sidnei Epelman; Kristin Knight; Denise Mills; Robert Phillips; Emma Potter; Demie Risby; Philippa Simpkin; Michael Sullivan; Sandra Cabral; Paula D Robinson; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.