David R Freyer1, Lu Chen2, Mark D Krailo3, Kristin Knight4, Doojduen Villaluna2, Bonnie Bliss2, Brad H Pollock5, Jagadeesh Ramdas6, Beverly Lange7, David Van Hoff8, Michele L VanSoelen8, John Wiernikowski9, Edward A Neuwelt4, Lillian Sung10. 1. Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: dfreyer@chla.usc.edu. 2. Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia, CA, USA. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Children's Oncology Group, Monrovia, CA, USA. 4. Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 6. Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 8. Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 9. Pharmaceutical Services, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 10. Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Sodium thiosulfate is an antioxidant shown in preclinical studies in animals to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss with timed administration after cisplatin without compromising the antitumour efficacy of cisplatin. The primary aim of this study was to assess sodium thiosulfate for prevention of cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and adolescents. METHODS:ACCL0431 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled participants at 38 participating Children's Oncology Group hospitals in the USA and Canada. Eligible participants aged 1-18 years with newly diagnosed cancer and normal audiometry were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sodium thiosulfate or observation (control group) in addition to their planned cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen, using permuted blocks of four. Randomisation was initially stratified by age and duration of cisplatin infusion. Stratification by previous cranial irradiation was added later as a protocol amendment. The allocation sequence was computer-generated centrally and concealed to all personnel. Participants received sodium thiosulfate 16 g/m2 intravenously 6 h after each cisplatin dose or observation. The primary endpoint was incidence of hearing loss 4 weeks after final cisplatin dose. Hearing was measured using standard audiometry and reviewed centrally by audiologists masked to allocation using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria but treatment was not masked for participants or clinicians. Analysis of the primary endpoint was by modified intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned patients irrespective of treatment received but restricted to those assessable for hearing loss. Enrolment is complete and this report represents the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00716976. FINDINGS:Between June 23, 2008, and Sept 28, 2012, 125 eligible participants were randomly assigned to either sodium thiosulfate (n=61) or observation (n=64). Of these, 104 participants were assessable for the primary endpoint (sodium thiosulfate, n=49; control, n=55). Hearing loss was identified in 14 (28·6%; 95% CI 16·6-43·3) participants in the sodium thiosulfate group compared with 31 (56·4%; 42·3-69·7) in the control group (p=0·00022). Adjusted for stratification variables, the likelihood of hearing loss was significantly lower in the sodium thiosulfate group compared with the control group (odds ratio 0·31, 95% CI 0·13-0·73; p=0·0036). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events reported, irrespective of attribution, were neutropenia (117 [66%] of 177 participant cycles in the sodium thiosulfate group vs 145 [65%] of 223 in the control group), whereas the most common non-haematological adverse event was hypokalaemia (25 [17%] of 147 vs 22 [12%] of 187). Of 194 serious adverse events reported in 26 participants who had received sodium thiosulfate, none were deemed probably or definitely related to sodium thiosulfate; the most common serious adverse event was decreased neutrophil count: 26 episodes in 14 participants. INTERPRETATION:Sodium thiosulfate protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and is not associated with serious adverse events attributed to its use. Further research is needed to define the appropriate role for sodium thiosulfate among emerging otoprotection strategies. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Sodium thiosulfate is an antioxidant shown in preclinical studies in animals to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss with timed administration after cisplatin without compromising the antitumour efficacy of cisplatin. The primary aim of this study was to assess sodium thiosulfate for prevention of cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and adolescents. METHODS: ACCL0431 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled participants at 38 participating Children's Oncology Group hospitals in the USA and Canada. Eligible participants aged 1-18 years with newly diagnosed cancer and normal audiometry were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sodium thiosulfate or observation (control group) in addition to their planned cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen, using permuted blocks of four. Randomisation was initially stratified by age and duration of cisplatin infusion. Stratification by previous cranial irradiation was added later as a protocol amendment. The allocation sequence was computer-generated centrally and concealed to all personnel. Participants received sodium thiosulfate 16 g/m2 intravenously 6 h after each cisplatin dose or observation. The primary endpoint was incidence of hearing loss 4 weeks after final cisplatin dose. Hearing was measured using standard audiometry and reviewed centrally by audiologists masked to allocation using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria but treatment was not masked for participants or clinicians. Analysis of the primary endpoint was by modified intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned patients irrespective of treatment received but restricted to those assessable for hearing loss. Enrolment is complete and this report represents the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00716976. FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2008, and Sept 28, 2012, 125 eligible participants were randomly assigned to either sodium thiosulfate (n=61) or observation (n=64). Of these, 104 participants were assessable for the primary endpoint (sodium thiosulfate, n=49; control, n=55). Hearing loss was identified in 14 (28·6%; 95% CI 16·6-43·3) participants in the sodium thiosulfate group compared with 31 (56·4%; 42·3-69·7) in the control group (p=0·00022). Adjusted for stratification variables, the likelihood of hearing loss was significantly lower in the sodium thiosulfate group compared with the control group (odds ratio 0·31, 95% CI 0·13-0·73; p=0·0036). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events reported, irrespective of attribution, were neutropenia (117 [66%] of 177 participant cycles in the sodium thiosulfate group vs 145 [65%] of 223 in the control group), whereas the most common non-haematological adverse event was hypokalaemia (25 [17%] of 147 vs 22 [12%] of 187). Of 194 serious adverse events reported in 26 participants who had received sodium thiosulfate, none were deemed probably or definitely related to sodium thiosulfate; the most common serious adverse event was decreased neutrophil count: 26 episodes in 14 participants. INTERPRETATION:Sodium thiosulfate protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children and is not associated with serious adverse events attributed to its use. Further research is needed to define the appropriate role for sodium thiosulfate among emerging otoprotection strategies. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Penelope R Brock; Kristin R Knight; David R Freyer; Kathleen C M Campbell; Peter S Steyger; Brian W Blakley; Shahrad R Rassekh; Kay W Chang; Brian J Fligor; Kaukab Rajput; Michael Sullivan; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Howard M Katzenstein; Kay W Chang; Mark Krailo; Zhengjia Chen; Milton J Finegold; Jon Rowland; Marleta Reynolds; Alberto Pappo; Wendy B London; Marcio Malogolowkin Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E A Neuwelt; R E Brummett; N D Doolittle; L L Muldoon; R A Kroll; M A Pagel; R Dojan; V Church; L G Remsen; J S Bubalo Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Theresa M Harned; Ondrej Kalous; Alexander Neuwelt; Jason Loera; Lingyun Ji; Peter Iovine; Richard Sposto; Edward A Neuwelt; C Patrick Reynolds Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Bokemeyer; C C Berger; J T Hartmann; C Kollmannsberger; H J Schmoll; M A Kuczyk; L Kanz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Matthew R Trendowski; Omar El-Charif; Mark J Ratain; Patrick Monahan; Zepeng Mu; Heather E Wheeler; Paul C Dinh; Darren R Feldman; Shirin Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard; Robert J Hamilton; David J Vaughn; Chunkit Fung; Christian Kollmannsberger; Taisei Mushiroda; Michiaki Kubo; Robyn Hannigan; Frederick Strathmann; Lawrence H Einhorn; Sophie D Fossa; Lois B Travis; M Eileen Dolan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert A Hazlitt; Tal Teitz; Justine D Bonga; Jie Fang; Shiyong Diao; Luigi Iconaru; Lei Yang; Asli N Goktug; Duane G Currier; Taosheng Chen; Zoran Rankovic; Jaeki Min; Jian Zuo Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Matthew P Lungren; Alexander J Towbin; Derek J Roebuck; Eric J Monroe; Anne E Gill; Avnesh Thakor; Richard B Towbin; Anne Marie Cahill; C Matthew Hawkins Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-01-23
Authors: Mohammad N Kayyali; Andrew J Ramsey; Elizabeth M Higbee-Dempsey; Lesan Yan; Bert W O'Malley; Andrew Tsourkas; Daqing Li Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2018-01-18
Authors: David R Freyer; Penelope R Brock; Kay W Chang; L Lee Dupuis; Sidnei Epelman; Kristin Knight; Denise Mills; Robert Phillips; Emma Potter; Demie Risby; Philippa Simpkin; Michael Sullivan; Sandra Cabral; Paula D Robinson; Lillian Sung Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2019-12-19