Literature DB >> 27914730

Quantitative comparison of operative skill using 2- and 3-dimensional monitors during laparoscopic phantom tasks.

Masayasu Nishi1, Shingo Kanaji2, Yoshito Otake3, Hitoshi Harada2, Masashi Yamamoto2, Taro Oshikiri2, Tetsu Nakamura2, Satoshi Suzuki2, Yuki Suzuki3, Yuta Hiasa3, Yoshinobu Sato3, Yoshihiro Kakeji2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent development of stereoscopic images using 3-dimensional monitors is expected to improve techniques for laparoscopic operation. Several studies have reported technical advantages in using 3-dimensional monitors with regard to operative accuracy and working speed, but there are few reports that analyze forceps motions by 3-dimensional optical tracking systems during standardized laparoscopic phantom tasks. We attempted to develop a 3-dimensional motion analysis system for assessing laparoscopic tasks and to clarify the efficacy of using stereoscopic images from a 3-dimensional monitor to track forceps movement during laparoscopy.
METHODS: Twenty surgeons performed 3 tasks (Task 1: a simple operation by the dominant hand, Task 2: a simple operation using both hands, Task 3: a complicated operation using both hands) under 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional systems. We tracked and recorded the motion of forceps tips with an optical marker captured by a 3-dimensional position tracker. We analyzed factors such as forceps path lengths, operation times, and technical errors for each task and compared the results of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional monitors.
RESULTS: Mean operation times and technical errors were improved significantly for all tasks performed under the 3-dimensional system compared with the 2-dimensional system; in addition, mean path lengths for the forceps tips were shorter for all tasks performed under the 3-dimensional system.
CONCLUSION: We found that stereoscopic images using a 3-dimensional monitor improved operative techniques with regard to increased accuracy and shorter path lengths for forceps movement, which resulted in a shorter operation time for basic phantom laparoscopic tasks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914730     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.

Authors:  Hitoshi Harada; Shingo Kanaji; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Yoshiko Matsuda; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Taro Oshikiri; Yasuo Sumi; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices.

Authors:  Hitoshi Harada; Shingo Kanaji; Masayasu Nishi; Yoshito Otake; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Yoshiko Matsuda; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Taro Oshikiri; Yasuo Sumi; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshinobu Sato; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students.

Authors:  Tibor Andrea Zwimpfer; Dominik Lacher; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; Michael Mueller
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hanna E Koppatz; Jukka I Harju; Jukka E Sirén; Panu J Mentula; Tom M Scheinin; Ville J Sallinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.