| Literature DB >> 27914474 |
Xiaolin Huang1,2, Lin Ding1,2, Kui Peng1,2, Lin Lin1,2, Tiange Wang1,2, Zhiyun Zhao1,2, Yu Xu1,2, Jieli Lu1,2, Yuhong Chen1,2, Weiqing Wang1,2, Yufang Bi1,2, Guang Ning1,2, Min Xu3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thyroid hormones have been associated with renal dysfunction in cross-sectional studies. However, prospective studies exploring the effect of thyroid hormones on renal function decline were sparse and got contradictive results. We aimed to prospectively explore the associations of thyroid hormones with incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) and rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in Chinese adults.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Glomerular filtration rate; Renal function; Thyroid hormones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27914474 PMCID: PMC5135765 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-1081-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Flow chart of study participants. eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ACR albumin–creatinine-ratio
Baseline characteristics of the participants according to incident CKD status
| Characteristics | Non-CKD | Incident CKD |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| n, % | 1905 (90.6) | 198 (9.4) | – |
| Age (years) | 58.9 ± 8.9 | 63.1 ± 10.1 | <0.0001 |
| Male (n, %) | 753 (39.5) | 73 (36.9) | 0.47 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.7 ± 3.4 | 25.5 ± 3.8 | 0.0006 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 86.3 ± 9.4 | 89.5 ± 9.7 | <0.0001 |
| Current drinker (n, %) | 344 (18.1) | 40 (20.2) | 0.58 |
| Current smoker (n, %) | 382 (20.1) | 39 (19.7) | 0.81 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 134 ± 24 | 144 ± 27 | <0.0001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78 ± 10 | 81 ± 10 | 0.001 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/l) | 1.40 (0.96–2.02) | 1.48 (1.01–2.41) | 0.02 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.40 ± 0.68 | 2.35 ± 0.68 | 0.30 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.37 ± 0.30 | 1.34 ± 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 5.15 ± 0.96 | 5.11 ± 1.05 | 0.64 |
| FPG (mmol/l) | 5.1 (4.7–5.8) | 5.6 (5.0–7.0) | <0.0001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.1 (5.7–6.5) | 6.4 (5.9–7.6) | <0.0001 |
| TSH (μIU/ml) | 1.44 (1.03–2.14) | 1.44 (1.01–2.07) | 0.35 |
| FT3 (pmol/l) | 4.65 ± 0.55 | 4.72 ± 1.11 | 0.16 |
| FT4 (pmol/l) | 14.27 ± 1.80 | 14.85 ± 2.36 | <0.0001 |
| TPOAb (IU/ml) | 0.30 (0.17–0.73) | 0.32 (0.18–0.71) | 0.55 |
| TGAb (IU/ml) | 1.06 (0.71–2.44) | 0.93 (0.71–1.91) | 0.09 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 92.4 ± 12.2 | 88.9 ± 14.4 | 0.0001 |
| Urinary ACR (mg/g) | 4.67 (2.39–8.71) | 9.57 (4.41–16.87) | <0.0001 |
| Use of antidiabetic drugs (n, %) | 208 (10.9) | 52 (26.3) | <0.0001 |
| Use of antihypertensive drugs (n, %) | 426 (22.4) | 63 (31.8) | 0.003 |
P values are calculated by t test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables
Data are means ± standard deviations or medians (interquartile ranges) for continuous variables, and numbers (proportions) for categorical variables
ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, BMI body mass index, DBP diastolic blood pressure, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, FT3 free triiodothyronine, FT4 free thyroxine, FPG fasting plasma glucose, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP systolic blood pressure, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone, TPOAb thyroid peroxidase antibody, TGAb thyroglobulin antibody
Association of thyroid hormone levels with incident CKD
| Case/number (%) | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum FT4 | ||||
| Tertile 1 | 47/699 (6.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tertile 2 | 60/701 (8.6) | 1.28 (0.86–1.91) | 1.26 (0.83–1.91) | 1.24 (0.82–1.88) |
| Tertile 3 | 91/703 (12.9) | 1.97 (1.36–2.86) | 1.91 (1.30–2.81) | 1.88 (1.27–2.77) |
| | <0.0001 | 0.0003 | 0.0008 | 0.001 |
| Each 1-pmol/l increase in FT4 | 198/2103 (9.4) | 1.13 (1.05–1.21) | 1.12 (1.04–1.20) | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) |
| Serum FT3 | ||||
| Tertile 1 | 65/687 (9.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tertile 2 | 68/712 (9.6) | 1.07 (0.74–1.53) | 1.11 (0.76–1.62) | 1.12 (0.76–1.63) |
| Tertile 3 | 65/704 (9.2) | 1.09 (0.75–1.59) | 1.06 (0.72–1.57) | 1.04 (0.70–1.54) |
| | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| Each 1-pmol/l increase in FT3 | 198/2103 (9.4) | 1.23 (1.01–1.49) | 1.21 (0.99–1.49) | 1.20 (0.98–1.47) |
| Serum TSH | ||||
| Tertile 1 | 64/700 (9.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tertile 2 | 74/700 (10.6) | 1.13 (0.79–1.61) | 1.31 (0.90–1.90) | 1.34 (0.92–1.94) |
| Tertile 3 | 60/703 (8.5) | 0.86 (0.59–1.26) | 0.99 (0.66–1.47) | 1.04 (0.69–1.56) |
| | 0.70 | 0.45 | 0.99 | 0.80 |
| Each 1-μIU/ml increase in TSH | 198/2103 (9.4) | 0.99 (0.91–1.07) | 0.99 (0.92–1.07) | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) |
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, BMI at baseline
Model 2: further adjusted for triglyceride, HDL-c, diabetes and hypertension status, current smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, use of antidiabetic drugs, urinary ACR, eGFR at baseline
Model 3: further adjusted for TPOAb, TGAb at baseline
P for trend values for percentages of incident CKD are calculated by using Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) method
Data are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals)
ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, BMI body mass index, CKD chronic kidney disease, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, FT3 free triiodothyronine, FT4 free thyroxine, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone, TPOAb thyroid peroxidase antibody, TGAb thyroglobulin antibody
Association of thyroid hormones with rapid eGFR decline during follow-up
| Case/number (%) | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum FT4 | ||||
| Tertile 1 | 40/699 (5.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tertile 2 | 56/701 (8.0) | 1.40 (0.92–2.14) | 1.38 (0.89–2.12) | 1.40 (0.91–2.16) |
| Tertile 3 | 69/703 (9.8) | 1.72 (1.15–2.59) | 1.61 (1.06–2.45) | 1.64 (1.07–2.50) |
| | 0.0004 | 0.009 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Each 1-pmol/l increase in FT4 | 165/2103 (7.9) | 1.12 (1.05–1.21) | 1.10 (1.02–1.18) | 1.10 (1.03–1.18) |
| Serum FT3 | ||||
| Tertile 1 | 55/687 (8.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tertile 2 | 69/712 (9.7) | 1.29 (0.89–1.87) | 1.35 (0.91–1.99) | 1.36 (0.92–2.00) |
| Tertile 3 | 41/704 (5.8) | 0.79 (0.51–1.21) | 0.84 (0.54–1.30) | 0.83 (0.53–1.30) |
| | 0.025 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.49 |
| Each 1-pmol/l increase in FT3 | 165/2103 (7.9) | 1.17 (0.95–1.44) | 1.14 (0.93–1.40) | 1.13 (0.92–1.39) |
| Serum TSH | ||||
| Tertile 1 | 63/700 (9.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Tertile 2 | 53/700 (7.6) | 0.77 (0.53–1.14) | 0.85 (0.57–1.26) | 0.85 (0.57–1.26) |
| Tertile 3 | 49/703 (7.0) | 0.67 (0.44–0.99) | 0.75 (0.50–1.15) | 0.74 (0.49–1.14) |
| | 0.35 | 0.046 | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Each 1-μIU/ml increase in TSH | 165/2103 (7.9) | 0.97 (0.88–1.08) | 1.00 (0.92–1.08) | 1.00 (0.92–1.08) |
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, BMI at baseline
Model 2: further adjusted for triglyceride, HDL-c, diabetes and hypertension status, current smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, use of antidiabetic drugs, eGFR at baseline
Model 3: Further adjusted for TPOAb, TGAb at baseline
P for trend values for percentages of rapid eGFR decline are calculated by using Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) method
Data are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals)
BMI body mass index, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, FT3 free triiodothyronine, FT4 free thyroxine, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone, TPOAb thyroid peroxidase antibody, TGAb thyroglobulin antibody
Association of baseline FT4 with predicted risks for future outcomes of incident CKD
| Predicted risks for future outcomes of incident CKD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Moderately increased risk | Combined high and very high increased risk | |
| Case/number (%) | 177/2103 (8.4) | 21/2103 (1.0) |
| Each 1-pmol/l increase in FT4 | ||
| Model 1 | 1.12 (1.04–1.21) | 1.18 (1.05–1.34) |
| Model 2 | 1.11 (1.03–1.19) | 1.22 (1.06–1.41) |
| Each 1-tertile increase in FT4 | ||
| Model 1 | 1.33 (1.09–1.61) | 2.73 (1.41–5.27) |
| Model 2 | 1.30 (1.06–1.59) | 2.61 (1.32–5.16) |
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, BMI at baseline
Model 2: further adjusted for triglyceride, HDL-c, diabetes and hypertension status, current smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, use of antidiabetic drugs, urinary ACR, eGFR, TPOAb and TGAb at baseline
Data are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals), calculated by using multinomial logit regression analysis, referenced to low risk of prognosis of incident CKD
ACR albumin-to-creatinine ratio, BMI body mass index, CKD chronic kidney disease, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, FT4 free thyroxine, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TPOAb thyroid peroxidase antibody, TGAb thyroglobulin antibody