Literature DB >> 27914313

Requests for cesarean deliveries: The politics of labor pain and pain relief in Shanghai, China.

Eileen Wang1.   

Abstract

Cesarean section rates have risen dramatically in China within the past 25 years, particularly driven by non-medical factors and maternal requests. One major reason women request cesareans is the fear of labor pain, in a country where a minority of women are given any form of pain relief during labor. Drawing upon ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews with 26 postpartum women and 8 providers at a Shanghai district hospital in June and July of 2015, this article elucidates how perceptions of labor pain and the environment of pain relief constructs the cesarean on maternal request. In particular, many women feared labor pain and, in a context without effective pharmacological pain relief or social support during labor, they came to view cesarean sections as a way to negotiate their labor pain. In some cases, women would request cesarean sections during labor as an expression of their pain and a call for a response to their suffering. However, physicians, under recent state policy, deny such requests, particularly as they do not view pain as a reasonable indication for a cesarean birth. This disconnect leads to a mismatch in goals for the experience of birth. To reduce unnecessary C-sections, policy makers should instead address the lack of pain relief during childbirth and develop other means of improving the childbirth experience that may relieve maternal anxiety, such as allowing family members to support the laboring woman and integrating a midwifery model for low-risk births within China's maternal-services system.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDMR; Cesarean deliveries; Childbirth; China; Labor pain; Pain relief

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27914313     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  16 in total

1.  A Segmented Logistic Regression Approach to Evaluating Change in Caesarean Section Rate with Reform of Birth Planning Policy in Two Regions in China from 2012 to 2016.

Authors:  Lili Kang; Shangyuan Ye; Kangzhen Jing; Yancun Fan; Qihui Chen; Ning Zhang; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-03-19

2.  Changes in caesarean section rates in China during the period of transition from the one-child to two-child policy era: cross-sectional National Household Health Services Surveys.

Authors:  Qian Long; Yaoguang Zhang; Jing Zhang; Xiaojun Tang; Carol Kingdon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy.

Authors:  Eileen Wang; Therese Hesketh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Placenta response of inflammation and oxidative stress in low-risk term childbirth: the implication of delivery mode.

Authors:  Yabin Hu; Kun Huang; Yuanfang Sun; Jianqing Wang; Yeqing Xu; Shuangqin Yan; Peng Zhu; Fangbiao Tao
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  The Elevated Rate of Cesarean Section and Its Contribution to Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases in Latin America: The Growing Involvement of the Microbiota.

Authors:  Fabien Magne; Alexa Puchi Silva; Bielka Carvajal; Martin Gotteland
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Carol Kingdon; Fan Yang; Michael Dominic Renecle; Shayesteh Jahanfar; Meghan A Bohren; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Clémence Schantz; Myriam de Loenzien; Sophie Goyet; Marion Ravit; Aurélien Dancoisne; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xiu Zhu; Yan Wang; Hong Zhou; Liqian Qiu; Ruyan Pang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fear of childbirth, nonurgent obstetric interventions, and newborn outcomes: A randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting with enhanced care as usual.

Authors:  Irena K Veringa-Skiba; Esther I de Bruin; Francisca J A van Steensel; Susan M Bögels
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.081

10.  Women's cesarean section preferences and influencing factors in relation to China's two-child policy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Huijuan Liang; Yancun Fan; Nan Zhang; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong; Qingchun Wang; Jing Gong; Hutcha Sriplung
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.