Literature DB >> 27913252

Sex and gender differences in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Marco Canevelli1, Federica Quarata2, Francesca Remiddi2, Flaminia Lucchini2, Eleonora Lacorte3, Nicola Vanacore3, Giuseppe Bruno2, Matteo Cesari4.   

Abstract

In recent years, epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence has drawn the attention on the influence of sex and gender on Alzheimer's disease (AD). Nevertheless, not enough attention has been paid to their impact on treatment outcomes. The present study is aimed at systematically retrieve, review and discuss data coming from available randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) on currently marketed treatments for AD (i.e., cholinesterase inhibitors [ChEIs] and memantine) in order to describe possible sex and gender differences in their efficacy, safety and tolerability. A systematic review of literature was performed. None of the retrieved studies reported data on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of considered medications separately in male and female patients with AD. We thus analyzed 48 excluded studies of potential interest, that is, almost all of the currently available trials on the four considered drugs. Nearly all the considered RCTs recruited a larger number of female participants to mirror the sexually unbalanced prevalence of AD. Only two studies took into account the potential influence of sex and gender on treatment efficacy, reporting no significant differences between men and women. None of the studies investigated potential sex and gender differences in the safety and tolerability of the four considered treatments. The existence of sex and gender differences in the efficacy and tolerability of ChEIs and memantine in AD has, to date, drawn limited to no attention. However, a considerable amount of data, with an adequate representativeness in terms of sex/gender distribution, seem to be already available for dedicated analyses on this topic. A greater effort should be made to collect and report data on those factors interacting with sex and gender that may significantly influence clinical manifestations, outcomes, and trajectories over time of AD patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; External validity; Gender medicine; Randomized controlled trials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27913252     DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  23 in total

1.  Sex Differences in the Prevalent Use of Oral Formulations of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Older Adults with Dementia.

Authors:  Lynn Zhu; Paula A Rochon; Andrea Gruneir; Wei Wu; Vasily Giannakeas; Peter C Austin; Nathan M Stall; Lisa McCarthy; Amanda Alberga; Nathan Herrmann; Sudeep S Gill; Susan E Bronskill
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Gender Differences in Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Patients - A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Chienhsiu Huang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Sex Differences in the Genetic Architecture of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Logan Dumitrescu; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; Kavya Sharman; Annah M Moore; Timothy J Hohman
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2019-01-21

Review 4.  Sex differences in Alzheimer's disease: Understanding the molecular impact.

Authors:  Carlos A Toro; Larry Zhang; Jiqing Cao; Dongming Cai
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Sex differences in stress reactivity in arousal and attention systems.

Authors:  Debra A Bangasser; Samantha R Eck; Evelyn Ordoñes Sanchez
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  External Validity of Randomized Controlled Trials on Alzheimer's Disease: The Biases of Frailty and Biological Aging.

Authors:  Marco Canevelli; Alessandro Trebbastoni; Federica Quarata; Fabrizia D'Antonio; Matteo Cesari; Carlo de Lena; Giuseppe Bruno
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees.

Authors:  Ignacio Segarra; Pilar Modamio; Cecilia Fernández; Eduardo L Mariño
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Sex Differences in Psychiatric Disease: A Focus on the Glutamate System.

Authors:  Megan M Wickens; Debra A Bangasser; Lisa A Briand
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 9.  Mitochondria-Targeted Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease: The Good, the Bad, the Potential.

Authors:  Yashi Mi; Guoyuan Qi; Roberta Diaz Brinton; Fei Yin
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 10.  Alpha-Secretase ADAM10 Regulation: Insights into Alzheimer's Disease Treatment.

Authors:  Rafaela Peron; Izabela Pereira Vatanabe; Patricia Regina Manzine; Antoni Camins; Márcia Regina Cominetti
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.