Jay P Reddy1, Chad Tang1, Tina Shih2, Bumyang Kim3, Charissa Kim1, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen1, James Welsh1, Marcelo Benveniste4, Jianjun Zhang5, Zhongxing Liao1, Daniel R Gomez6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: dgomez@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few data to support the use of varying imaging modalities in evaluating recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared the efficacy of surveillance positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) versus CT scans of the chest in detecting recurrences after definitive radiation for NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 200 patients treated between 2000 and 2011 who met the inclusion criteria of stage III NSCLC, completion of definitive radiation treatment, and absence of recurrence within the initial 6 months. These patients were then grouped on the basis of the use of PET/CT imaging during postradiation surveillance. Patients who received ≥ 1 PET/CT scans within 6 months of the end of radiation treatment were placed in the PET group whereas all others were placed in the CT group. We compared survival times from the end of treatment to the date of death or last follow-up using log rank tests. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with decreased survival. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, median event-free survival (EFS) was 26.7 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 41.2 months. The CT group had a median EFS of 21.4 months versus 29.4 months for the PET group (P = .59). There was no difference in OS between the CT and PET groups (median OS of 41.2 and 41.3 months, respectively; P = .59). There was also no difference in local recurrence-free survival or distant metastases-free survival between the CT-only and PET/CT groups (P = .92 and P = .30, respectively). Similarly, in multivariate analysis, stratification into the PET group was not associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.34; P = .60) or OS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.83-1.7; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: In stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive radiation and without early recurrence, PET/CT scan surveillance did not result in decreased time to detection of locoregional or distant recurrence or improved survival.
BACKGROUND: There are few data to support the use of varying imaging modalities in evaluating recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared the efficacy of surveillance positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) versus CT scans of the chest in detecting recurrences after definitive radiation for NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 200 patients treated between 2000 and 2011 who met the inclusion criteria of stage III NSCLC, completion of definitive radiation treatment, and absence of recurrence within the initial 6 months. These patients were then grouped on the basis of the use of PET/CT imaging during postradiation surveillance. Patients who received ≥ 1 PET/CT scans within 6 months of the end of radiation treatment were placed in the PET group whereas all others were placed in the CT group. We compared survival times from the end of treatment to the date of death or last follow-up using log rank tests. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with decreased survival. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, median event-free survival (EFS) was 26.7 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 41.2 months. The CT group had a median EFS of 21.4 months versus 29.4 months for the PET group (P = .59). There was no difference in OS between the CT and PET groups (median OS of 41.2 and 41.3 months, respectively; P = .59). There was also no difference in local recurrence-free survival or distant metastases-free survival between the CT-only and PET/CT groups (P = .92 and P = .30, respectively). Similarly, in multivariate analysis, stratification into the PET group was not associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.34; P = .60) or OS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.83-1.7; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: In stage III NSCLCpatients treated with definitive radiation and without early recurrence, PET/CT scan surveillance did not result in decreased time to detection of locoregional or distant recurrence or improved survival.
Authors: L E Quint; S Tummala; L J Brisson; I R Francis; A S Krupnick; E A Kazerooni; M D Iannettoni; R I Whyte; M B Orringer Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jose L Lopez Guerra; Gregory Gladish; Ritsuko Komaki; Daniel Gomez; Yan Zhuang; Zhongxing Liao Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: F V Fossella; R DeVore; R N Kerr; J Crawford; R R Natale; F Dunphy; L Kalman; V Miller; J S Lee; M Moore; D Gandara; D Karp; E Vokes; M Kris; Y Kim; F Gamza; L Hammershaimb Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F A Shepherd; J Dancey; R Ramlau; K Mattson; R Gralla; M O'Rourke; N Levitan; L Gressot; M Vincent; R Burkes; S Coughlin; Y Kim; J Berille Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexander J Antoniou; Charles Marcus; Abdel K Tahari; Richard L Wahl; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 10.057