C E Adams1, J Smith2, V Watson1, C Robertson3, S J Dancer4. 1. Department of Anaesthesia, Hairmyres Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, UK. 2. Department of Microbiology, Hairmyres Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, UK. 3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK; Health Protection Scotland, Glasgow, UK; International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France. 4. Department of Microbiology, Hairmyres Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, UK; School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: stephanie.dancer@lanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Critical care patients are at increased risk of infection. Near-patient surfaces act as reservoirs of microbial soil, which may contain pathogens. AIM: To correlate soil levels with hand-touch frequency of near-patient sites in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Five sites around each bed in a 10-bed ICU were screened for total microbial soil (cfu/cm2) and Staphylococcus aureus every month for 10 months. Selected sites were infusion pump and cardiac monitor, left and right bedrails, and bed table. Ten 1 h covert audits of hand-touch frequency of these sites were performed in order to provide an average hand-touch count, which was modelled against soil levels obtained from microbiological screening. FINDINGS: Seven of 10 staphylococci were found in conjunction with gross contamination of a specific site (P=0.005) and the same proportion from three most frequently touched sites (bedrails and bed table). There was a linear association between four sites demonstrating gross microbial contamination (>12 cfu/cm2) and mean number of hand-touch counts (P=0.08). The bed table was handled most but was not the most contaminated site. We suspected that customary placement of alcohol gel containers on bed tables may have reduced microbiological yield. Removing the gel container from one table confirmed its inhibitory effect on microbial contamination after rescreening (19% vs 50% >12 cfu/cm2: P=0.007). CONCLUSION: Surface bioburden at near-patient sites in ICU is associated with hand-contact frequencies by staff and visitors. This supports the need for targeted hygienic cleaning in a high-risk healthcare environment.
BACKGROUND: Critical care patients are at increased risk of infection. Near-patient surfaces act as reservoirs of microbial soil, which may contain pathogens. AIM: To correlate soil levels with hand-touch frequency of near-patient sites in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Five sites around each bed in a 10-bed ICU were screened for total microbial soil (cfu/cm2) and Staphylococcus aureus every month for 10 months. Selected sites were infusion pump and cardiac monitor, left and right bedrails, and bed table. Ten 1 h covert audits of hand-touch frequency of these sites were performed in order to provide an average hand-touch count, which was modelled against soil levels obtained from microbiological screening. FINDINGS: Seven of 10 staphylococci were found in conjunction with gross contamination of a specific site (P=0.005) and the same proportion from three most frequently touched sites (bedrails and bed table). There was a linear association between four sites demonstrating gross microbial contamination (>12 cfu/cm2) and mean number of hand-touch counts (P=0.08). The bed table was handled most but was not the most contaminated site. We suspected that customary placement of alcohol gel containers on bed tables may have reduced microbiological yield. Removing the gel container from one table confirmed its inhibitory effect on microbial contamination after rescreening (19% vs 50% >12 cfu/cm2: P=0.007). CONCLUSION: Surface bioburden at near-patient sites in ICU is associated with hand-contact frequencies by staff and visitors. This supports the need for targeted hygienic cleaning in a high-risk healthcare environment.
Authors: Vincent C C Cheng; Hong Chen; Shuk-Ching Wong; Jonathan H K Chen; Wing-Chun Ng; Simon Y C So; Tuen-Ching Chan; Sally C Y Wong; Pak-Leung Ho; Lona Mody; Felix H W Chan; Andrew T Y Wong; Kwok-Yung Yuen Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Windy D Tanner; Molly K Leecaster; Yue Zhang; Kristina M Stratford; Jeanmarie Mayer; Lindsay D Visnovsky; Heba Alhmidi; Jennifer L Cadnum; Annette L Jencson; Sreelatha Koganti; Christina P Bennett; Curtis J Donskey; Judith Noble-Wang; Sujan C Reddy; Laura J Rose; Lauren Watson; Emma Ide; Tyler Wipperfurth; Nasia Safdar; Maria Arasim; Colleen Macke; Patti Roman; Sarah L Krein; Catherine Loc-Carrillo; Matthew H Samore Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Chetan Jinadatha; Frank C Villamaria; John D Coppin; Charles R Dale; Marjory D Williams; Ryan Whitworth; Mark Stibich Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Beatrice Casini; Benedetta Tuvo; Maria Luisa Cristina; Anna Maria Spagnolo; Michele Totaro; Angelo Baggiani; Gaetano Pierpaolo Privitera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 3.390