Literature DB >> 27912001

Individual and combined effects of two types of phenological shifts on predator-prey interactions.

Nick L Rasmussen1, Volker H W Rudolf2.   

Abstract

Timing of phenological events varies among years with natural variation in environmental conditions and is also shifting in response to climate change. These phenological shifts likely have many effects on species interactions. Most research on the ecological consequences of phenological shifts has focused on variation in simple metrics such as phenological firsts. However, for a population, a phenological event exhibits a temporal distribution with many attributes that can vary (e.g., mean, variance, skewness), each of which likely has distinct effects on interactions. In this study, we manipulated two attributes of the phenological distribution of a prey species to determine their individual and combined effects on predator-prey interactions. Specifically, we studied how shifts in the mean and variation around the mean (i.e., synchrony) of hatching by tadpoles (Hyla cinerea) affected interactions with predatory dragonfly naiads (Tramea carolina). At the end of larval development, we quantified survival and growth of predator and prey. We found that both types of shifts altered demographic rates of the prey; that the effects of synchrony shifts, though rarely studied, were at least as strong as those due to mean shifts; and that the combined effects of shifts in synchrony and mean were additive rather than synergistic. By dissecting the roles of two types of shifts, this study represents a significant step toward a comprehensive understanding of the complex effects of phenological shifts on species interactions. Embracing this complexity is critical for predicting how climate change will alter community dynamics.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Hyla cinereazzm321990; zzm321990Tramea carolinazzm321990; climate change; community assembly; dragonfly; size-structured interactions; synchrony; tadpole

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27912001     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  4 in total

1.  Different factors limit early- and late-season windows of opportunity for monarch development.

Authors:  Louie H Yang; Karen Swan; Eric Bastin; Jessica Aguilar; Meredith Cenzer; Andrew Codd; Natalie Gonzalez; Tracie Hayes; August Higgins; Xang Lor; Chido Macharaga; Marshall McMunn; Kenya Oto; Nicholas Winarto; Darren Wong; Tabatha Yang; Numan Afridi; Sarah Aguilar; Amelia Allison; Arden Ambrose-Winters; Edwin Amescua; Mattias Apse; Nancy Avoce; Kirstin Bastin; Emily Bolander; Jessica Burroughs; Cristian Cabrera; Madeline Candy; Ariana Cavett; Melina Cavett; Lemuel Chang; Miles Claret; Delaney Coleman; Jacob Concha; Paxson Danzer; Joe DaRosa; Audrey Dufresne; Claire Duisenberg; Allyson Earl; Emily Eckey; Maddie English; Alexander Espejo; Erika Faith; Amy Fang; Alejandro Gamez; Jackelin Garcini; Julie Garcini; Giancarlo Gilbert-Igelsrud; Kelly Goedde-Matthews; Sarah Grahn; Paloma Guerra; Vanessa Guerra; Madison Hagedorn; Katie Hall; Griffin Hall; Jake Hammond; Cody Hargadon; Victoria Henley; Sarah Hinesley; Celeste Jacobs; Camille Johnson; Tattiana Johnson; Zachary Johnson; Emma Juchau; Celeste Kaplan; Andrew Katznelson; Ronja Keeley; Tatum Kubik; Theodore Lam; Chalinee Lansing; Andrea Lara; Vivian Le; Breana Lee; Kyra Lee; Maddy Lemmo; Scott Lucio; Angela Luo; Salman Malakzay; Luke Mangney; Joseph Martin; Wade Matern; Byron McConnell; Maya McHale; Giulia McIsaac; Carolanne McLennan; Stephanie Milbrodt; Mohammed Mohammed; Morgan Mooney-McCarthy; Laura Morgan; Clare Mullin; Sarah Needles; Kayla Nunes; Fiona O'Keeffe; Olivia O'Keeffe; Geoffrey Osgood; Jessica Padilla; Sabina Padilla; Isabella Palacio; Verio Panelli; Kendal Paulson; Jace Pearson; Tate Perez; Brenda Phrakonekham; Iason Pitsillides; Alex Preisler; Nicholas Preisler; Hailey Ramirez; Sylvan Ransom; Camille Renaud; Tracy Rocha; Haley Saris; Ryan Schemrich; Lyla Schoenig; Sophia Sears; Anand Sharma; Jessica Siu; Maddie Spangler; Shaili Standefer; Kelly Strickland; Makaila Stritzel; Emily Talbert; Sage Taylor; Emma Thomsen; Katrina Toups; Kyle Tran; Hong Tran; Maraia Tuqiri; Sara Valdes; George VanVorhis; Sandy Vue; Shauna Wallace; Johnna Whipple; Paja Yang; Meg Ye; David Yo; Yichao Zeng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Demographic effects of phenological variation in natural populations of two pond-breeding salamanders.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Julia E Earl; Daniel J Hocking; Michael S Osbourn; Tracy A G Rittenhouse; Jarrett R Johnson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Variation in phenology and density differentially affects predator-prey interactions between salamanders.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Freya E Rowland; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Resource limitation alters effects of phenological shifts on inter-specific competition.

Authors:  Volker H W Rudolf; Sena McCrory
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.