Literature DB >> 27911979

Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes associated with TP53 and BRAFNon-V600 mutations in cutaneous melanoma patients.

Dae Won Kim1, Lauren E Haydu2, Aron Y Joon3, Roland L Bassett3, Alan E Siroy4, Michael T Tetzlaff4,5, Mark J Routbort4, Rodabe N Amaria6, Jennifer A Wargo2,7, Jennifer L McQuade6, Jan Kemnade8, Patrick Hwu6, Scott E Woodman6,9, Jason Roszik6,9, Kevin B Kim10, Jeffrey E Gershenwald2,11, Alexander J Lazar4,5, Michael A Davies5,6,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BRAFV600 , NRAS, TP53, and BRAFNon-V600 are among the most common mutations detected in non-acral cutaneous melanoma patients. Although several studies have identified clinical and pathological features associated with BRAFV600 and NRAS mutations, limited data are available regarding the correlates and significance of TP53 and BRAFNon-V600 mutations.
METHODS: This study analyzed the patient demographics, primary tumor features, and clinical outcomes of a large cohort of non-acral cutaneous melanoma patients who had undergone clinically indicated molecular testing (n = 926).
RESULTS: The prevalence of BRAFV600 , NRAS, TP53, and BRAFNon-V600 mutations was 43%, 21%, 19%, and 7%, respectively. The presence of a TP53 mutation was associated with older age (P = .019), a head and neck primary tumor site (P = .0001), and longer overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of stage IV disease in univariate (P = .039) and multivariate analyses (P = .015). BRAFNon-V600 mutations were associated with older age (P = .005) but not with primary tumor features or OS from stage IV. Neither TP53 nor BRAFNon-V600 mutations correlated significantly with OS with frontline ipilimumab treatment, and the TP53 status was not significantly associated with outcomes with frontline BRAF inhibitor therapy. Eleven patients with BRAFNon-V600 mutations were treated with a BRAF inhibitor. Three patients were not evaluable for a response because of treatment cessation for toxicities; the remaining patients had disease progression as the best response to therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: These results add to the understanding of the clinical features associated with TP53 and BRAFNon-V600 mutations in advanced cutaneous melanoma patients, and they support the rationale for evaluating the prognostic significance of TP53 in other cohorts of melanoma patients. Cancer 2017;123:1372-1381.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAFNon-V600; BRAFV600; TP53; melanoma; mutations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27911979      PMCID: PMC5384865          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  24 in total

1.  NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Roland L Bassett; Chaan S Ng; Jonathan L Curry; Richard W Joseph; Gladys C Alvarado; Michelle L Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Kevin B Kim; Alexander J Lazar; Patrick Hwu; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Gender Disparity and Mutation Burden in Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Sameer Gupta; Mykyta Artomov; William Goggins; Mark Daly; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  TP53 mutations in human cancers: functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes.

Authors:  A Petitjean; M I W Achatz; A L Borresen-Dale; P Hainaut; M Olivier
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  p53 prevents progression of nevi to melanoma predominantly through cell cycle regulation.

Authors:  Tamara Terzian; Enrique C Torchia; Daisy Dai; Steven E Robinson; Kazutoshi Murao; Regan A Stiegmann; Victoria Gonzalez; Glen M Boyle; Marianne B Powell; Pamela M Pollock; Guillermina Lozano; William A Robinson; Dennis R Roop; Neil F Box
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.693

5.  Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  BRAF(V600) inhibitor GSK2118436 targeted inhibition of mutant BRAF in cancer patients does not impair overall immune competency.

Authors:  David S Hong; Luis Vence; Gerald Falchook; Laszlo G Radvanyi; Chengwen Liu; Vicki Goodman; Jeffery J Legos; Sam Blackman; Antonio Scarmadio; Razelle Kurzrock; Gregory Lizee; Patrick Hwu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Luana Poeta; Judith Manola; Meredith A Goldwasser; Arlene Forastiere; Nicole Benoit; Joseph A Califano; John A Ridge; Jarrard Goodwin; Daniel Kenady; John Saunders; William Westra; David Sidransky; Wayne M Koch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  BRAF(L597) mutations in melanoma are associated with sensitivity to MEK inhibitors.

Authors:  Kimberly Brown Dahlman; Junfeng Xia; Katherine Hutchinson; Charles Ng; Donald Hucks; Peilin Jia; Mohammad Atefi; Zengliu Su; Suzanne Branch; Pamela L Lyle; Donna J Hicks; Viviana Bozon; John A Glaspy; Neal Rosen; David B Solit; James L Netterville; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Jeffrey A Sosman; Antoni Ribas; Zhongming Zhao; William Pao
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  p53 mutations in human cutaneous melanoma correlate with sun exposure but are not always involved in melanomagenesis.

Authors:  S F Zerp; A van Elsas; L T Peltenburg; P I Schrier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Ultraviolet radiation accelerates BRAF-driven melanomagenesis by targeting TP53.

Authors:  Amaya Viros; Berta Sanchez-Laorden; Malin Pedersen; Simon J Furney; Joel Rae; Kate Hogan; Sarah Ejiama; Maria Romina Girotti; Martin Cook; Nathalie Dhomen; Richard Marais
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genetic and Genomic Characterization of 462 Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenografts, Tumor Biopsies, and Cell Lines.

Authors:  Bradley Garman; Ioannis N Anastopoulos; Clemens Krepler; Patricia Brafford; Katrin Sproesser; Yuchao Jiang; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Ravi Amaravadi; Joseph Bennett; Marilda Beqiri; David Elder; Keith T Flaherty; Dennie T Frederick; Tara C Gangadhar; Michael Guarino; David Hoon; Giorgos Karakousis; Qin Liu; Nandita Mitra; Nicholas J Petrelli; Lynn Schuchter; Batool Shannan; Carol L Shields; Jennifer Wargo; Brandon Wenz; Melissa A Wilson; Min Xiao; Wei Xu; Xaiowei Xu; Xiangfan Yin; Nancy R Zhang; Michael A Davies; Meenhard Herlyn; Katherine L Nathanson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Genomic Features of Exceptional Response in Vemurafenib ± Cobimetinib-treated Patients with BRAF V600-mutated Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Yibing Yan; Matthew J Wongchenko; Caroline Robert; James Larkin; Paolo A Ascierto; Brigitte Dréno; Michele Maio; Claus Garbe; Paul B Chapman; Jeffrey A Sosman; Zhen Shi; Hartmut Koeppen; Jessie J Hsu; Ilsung Chang; Ivor Caro; Isabelle Rooney; Grant A McArthur; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Classifying BRAF alterations in cancer: new rational therapeutic strategies for actionable mutations.

Authors:  Matthew Dankner; April A N Rose; Shivshankari Rajkumar; Peter M Siegel; Ian R Watson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Natural Disease History, Outcomes, and Co-mutations in a Series of Patients With BRAF-Mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Myall; Solomon Henry; Douglas Wood; Joel W Neal; Summer S Han; Sukhmani K Padda; Heather A Wakelee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Trametinib in Non-V600 BRAF Mutant Melanoma: A Phase II Study.

Authors:  Caroline A Nebhan; Douglas B Johnson; Ryan J Sullivan; Roda N Amaria; Keith T Flaherty; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  Correlation of histopathologic characteristics to protein expression and function in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Charlotte Welinder; Krzysztof Pawłowski; A Marcell Szasz; Maria Yakovleva; Yutaka Sugihara; Johan Malm; Göran Jönsson; Christian Ingvar; Lotta Lundgren; Bo Baldetorp; Håkan Olsson; Melinda Rezeli; Thomas Laurell; Elisabet Wieslander; György Marko-Varga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pan-RAF and MEK vertical inhibition enhances therapeutic response in non-V600 BRAF mutant cells.

Authors:  Eszter Molnár; Dominika Rittler; Marcell Baranyi; Michael Grusch; Walter Berger; Balázs Döme; József Tóvári; Clemens Aigner; József Tímár; Tamás Garay; Balázs Hegedűs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  The Role of p53 Dysfunction in Colorectal Cancer and Its Implication for Therapy.

Authors:  Maurice Michel; Leonard Kaps; Annett Maderer; Peter R Galle; Markus Moehler
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Metastases risk in thin cutaneous melanoma: prognostic value of clinical-pathologic characteristics and mutation profile.

Authors:  Antonio G Richetta; Virginia Valentini; Federica Marraffa; Giovanni Paolino; Piera Rizzolo; Valentina Silvestri; Veronica Zelli; Anna Carbone; Cinzia Di Mattia; Stefano Calvieri; Pasquale Frascione; Pietro Donati; Laura Ottini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-14

10.  Assessment of clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma patients with CDKN2A and TP53 pathogenic mutations.

Authors:  Thomas T DeLeon; Daniel R Almquist; Benjamin R Kipp; Blake T Langlais; Aaron Mangold; Jennifer L Winters; Heidi E Kosiorek; Richard W Joseph; Roxana S Dronca; Matthew S Block; Robert R McWilliams; Lisa A Kottschade; Kandelaria M Rumilla; Jesse S Voss; Mahesh Seetharam; Aleksandar Sekulic; Svetomir N Markovic; Alan H Bryce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.