Yee Tak Derek Cheung1,2, Ching Han Helen Chan3, Man Ping Wang2, Ho Cheung William Li2, Tai-Hing Lam1. 1. 1 School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, China . 2. 2 School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, China . 3. 3 Integrated Centre on Smoking Cessation, Tung Wah Group of Hospitals , Hong Kong, China .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Online social groups have been increasingly used for smoking cessation intervention. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to explore the social support components of the online discussion through WhatsApp and Facebook, how these components addressed the need of relapse prevention, and how the participants evaluated this intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We coded and analyzed the posts (N = 467) by the 82 recent quitters in WhatsApp and Facebook social groups, who were recruited from the eight smoking cessation clinics in Hong Kong to participate in a pragmatic randomized trial of relapse prevention. Participants' postintervention feedback was collected from the 13 qualitative interviews after the intervention. RESULTS: The WhatsApp social groups had more participants' posts than the Facebook counterparts. The participants' posts in the online social groups could be classified as sharing views and experiences (55.5%), encouragement (28.7%), and knowledge and information (15.8%). About half of the participants' posts (52.9%) addressed the themes listed in the U.S. Clinical Practice Guideline for preventing smoking relapse. The participants perceived the posts as useful reminders for smoking cessation, but avoidance of reporting relapse, inactive discussions, and uninteresting content were barriers to the success of the intervention. DISCUSSION: Online social groups provided a useful platform for the delivery of cessation support and encouragement of reporting abstinence, which support relapse prevention. The effectiveness of such intervention can be improved by encouraging more self-report of relapse, active discussions, sharing of interesting content, and using an appropriate discussion platform. CONCLUSION: Quitters who participate in the online social groups can benefit from peer support and information sharing, and hence prevent smoking relapse.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Online social groups have been increasingly used for smoking cessation intervention. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to explore the social support components of the online discussion through WhatsApp and Facebook, how these components addressed the need of relapse prevention, and how the participants evaluated this intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We coded and analyzed the posts (N = 467) by the 82 recent quitters in WhatsApp and Facebook social groups, who were recruited from the eight smoking cessation clinics in Hong Kong to participate in a pragmatic randomized trial of relapse prevention. Participants' postintervention feedback was collected from the 13 qualitative interviews after the intervention. RESULTS: The WhatsApp social groups had more participants' posts than the Facebook counterparts. The participants' posts in the online social groups could be classified as sharing views and experiences (55.5%), encouragement (28.7%), and knowledge and information (15.8%). About half of the participants' posts (52.9%) addressed the themes listed in the U.S. Clinical Practice Guideline for preventing smoking relapse. The participants perceived the posts as useful reminders for smoking cessation, but avoidance of reporting relapse, inactive discussions, and uninteresting content were barriers to the success of the intervention. DISCUSSION: Online social groups provided a useful platform for the delivery of cessation support and encouragement of reporting abstinence, which support relapse prevention. The effectiveness of such intervention can be improved by encouraging more self-report of relapse, active discussions, sharing of interesting content, and using an appropriate discussion platform. CONCLUSION: Quitters who participate in the online social groups can benefit from peer support and information sharing, and hence prevent smoking relapse.
Authors: Danielle E Ramo; Manpreet Kaur; Ella S Corpuz; Derek D Satre; Kevin Delucchi; Sandra A Brown; Judith J Prochaska Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Yee Tak Derek Cheung; Ching Han Helen Chan; Kin Sang Ho; Wai-Yin Patrick Fok; Mike Conway; Carlos King Ho Wong; William Ho Cheung Li; Man Ping Wang; Tai Hing Lam Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda; Valeria L Mata; Emanuel Vanegas; Miguel Felix; Jonathan A Bernstein; Fanny M Jiménez; Juan Carlos Calderon; Peter Chedraui; Antonio Wd Gavilanes Journal: Int J Telemed Appl Date: 2020-01-23