Literature DB >> 27911129

Socioeconomic position and mortality among patients with prostate cancer: influence of mediating factors.

Signe Benzon Larsen1,2, Klaus Brasso2, Jane Christensen3, Christoffer Johansen1,4, Anne Tjønneland5, Søren Friis3, Peter Iversen2, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Men with low socioeconomic position experience higher mortality after a prostate cancer diagnosis compared to men with a higher socioeconomic position, however, the specific mediators of this association are unclear. We therefore evaluated the influence of potential mediators on the association between socioeconomic position, and prostate cancer-specific and all-cause death in prostate cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of prostate cancer patients in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health study. All patients completed questionnaires and anthropometric measurements at enrollment. Information on educational level, income, comorbidity and vital status was obtained by linkage to Danish nationwide registries. Clinical data and anthropometric measures were collected from medical records at diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause and prostate cancer-specific death according to socioeconomic position and potential mediators.
RESULTS: We included 953 prostate cancer patients identified among 27 179 male participants in the Diet, Cancer and Health study who were followed for a median of 6.5 years (interquartile range 6.4-11.2 years). Patients with low socioeconomic position were more often overweight or obese at baseline. Low socioeconomic position was associated with increased prostate cancer-specific and all-cause death. The increased mortality could largely be explained by tumor aggressiveness, comorbidity, treatment and metabolic indicators, except for patients in the lowest income group. DISCUSSION: Our study confirmed the a priori assumption that socioeconomic position is associated with increased mortality after prostate cancer. The increased mortality could largely be explained by lifestyle and clinical parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27911129     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1260771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

1.  Geographical variations of socioeconomic status and prostate cancer mortality in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shih-Yung Su
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Prescription rates for commonly used drugs before and after a prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Signe Benzon Larsen; Christian Dehlendorff; Charlotte Skriver; Anton Pottegård; Søren Friis; Martin Andreas Røder; Klaus Brasso; Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Factors Explaining Socio-Economic Inequalities in Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nina Afshar; Dallas R English; Roger L Milne
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

4.  Geographical variations in cancer mortality and social inequalities in southern Spain (Andalusia). 2002-2013.

Authors:  Vanessa Santos-Sánchez; Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña; Francisco Viciana; Antonio Escolar-Pujolar; Lucia Pozzi; Rebeca Ramis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Socioeconomic Gradients in Prostate Cancer Incidence Among Canadian Males: A Trend Analysis From 1992 to 2010.

Authors:  Mohammad Hajizadeh; Ashley Whelan; Grace M Johnston; Robin Urquhart
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  Sociodemographic and clinical factors affecting the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Joanna Rosińczuk; Maria Przyszlak; Izabella Uchmanowicz
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.