Literature DB >> 27910799

Validation of the Danish version of the Quick-Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire.

Jesper Ougaard Schønnemann1, Jens Eggers.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Quick-Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire is an 11-item region-specific questionnaire used to measure the effect of clinical treatment of disorders and injuries to the upper extremity. During its original development, it was shown that the QuickDASH is a valid and reliable outcome measure. The purpose of this study was to validate the Danish version of the QuickDASH in patients with wrist fractures, using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) as an evaluation tool.
METHODS: We included patients with wrist fractures. They all answered the QuickDASH and the NHP during their ambulatory follow-up. We investigated time to complete questionnaire. Internal consistency was tested with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability was tested using the intra-class correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman's 95% limits of agreement and difference of mean. Convergent validity was calculated as correlation with the domains of Pain and Physical mobility in the NHP, and content validity was tested to reveal floor and ceiling effects.
RESULTS: We included 61 patients. The time burden, Cronbach's alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient were excellent. Pearson's correlation for convergent validity was high for both Pain and Physical mobility, and we recorded a divergent validity for the remaining domains of the NHP (Sleep and Social isolation). Furthermore, we found a good distribution of items showing no floor or ceiling effect.
CONCLUSION: The Danish version of the QuickDASH is a valid and practical questionnaire for use in Danish wrist fracture patients. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27910799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med J        ISSN: 2245-1919            Impact factor:   1.240


  5 in total

1.  Patients who are candidates for subacromial decompression have more pronounced range of motion deficits, but do not differ in self-reported shoulder function, strength or pain compared to non-candidates.

Authors:  Adam Witten; Mikkel B Clausen; Kristian Thorborg; Mikkel L Attrup; Per Hölmich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Objective Outcome Measures Continue to Improve from 6 to 12 Months after Conservatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly-A Prospective Evaluation of 50 Patients.

Authors:  Rikke Thorninger; Daniel Wæver; Jonas Pedersen; Jens Tvedegaard-Christensen; Michael Tjørnild; Martin Lind; Jan Duedal Rölfing
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Measurement properties of the musculoskeletal health questionnaire (MSK-HQ): a between country comparison.

Authors:  David Høyrup Christiansen; Gareth McCray; Trine Nøhr Winding; Johan Hviid Andersen; Kent Jacob Nielsen; Sven Karstens; Jonathan C Hill
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Responsiveness and minimal important change for the quick-DASH in patients with shoulder disorders.

Authors:  Cecilie Rud Budtz; Johan Hviid Andersen; Nils-Bo de Vos Andersen; David Høyrup Christiansen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Effectiveness of an expert assessment and individualised treatment compared with a minimal home-based exercise program in women with late-term shoulder impairments after primary breast cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kim Michéle Feder; Hans Bjarke Rahr; Marianne Djernes Lautrup; Heidi Klakk Egebæk; Robin Christensen; Kim Gordon Ingwersen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.728

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.