Literature DB >> 27909951

Contrasting Patterns in Solitary and Eusocial Bees While Responding to Landscape Features in the Brazilian Cerrado: a Multiscaled Perspective.

D P Silva1, D S Nogueira2, P De Marco3.   

Abstract

Landscape structure is an important determinant of biological fluxes and species composition, but species do not respond equally to landscape features or spatial extents. Evaluating "multi-scale" responses of species to landscape structure is an important framework to be considered, allowing insights about habitat requirements for different groups. We evaluated the response of Brazilian Cerrado's bees (eusocial vs. solitary ones) to both the amount and isolation of remnant vegetation in eight nested multiple-local scales. Response variables included abundance, observed, and estimated species richness, and beta diversity (split into nestedness and turnover resultant dissimilarities). Eusocial species' abundance responded to landscape structure at narrow scales of fragment isolation (250 m of radius from sampling sites), while solitary species' abundance responded to broader scales to fragment area (2000 m). Eusocial species nestedness also responded to landscape features in broader scales (1500 m), especially to increasing fragment isolation. However, all the remaining response variables did not respond to any other landscape variables in any spatial scale considered. Such contrasting responses of the abundances of eusocial vs. solitary species are related to the inherent life-history traits of each group. Important attributes in this context are different requirements on food resources, population features, and flight abilities. Species-specific dispersal abilities may be the main determinants of the nested patterns found for eusocial species at 1500 m. Considering these results, we suggest that different bee groups are considered separately in further landscape analyses, especially in other Brazilian biomes, for a better understanding of landscape effects on these organisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerrado savanna; Habitat; bees; fragmentation; isolation; spatial extent

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909951     DOI: 10.1007/s13744-016-0461-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neotrop Entomol        ISSN: 1519-566X            Impact factor:   1.434


  26 in total

1.  Reproductive phenological patterns of cerrado plant species at the Pé-de-Gigante Reserve (Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP, Brazil): a comparison between the herbaceous and woody floras.

Authors:  M A Batalha; W Mantovani
Journal:  Rev Bras Biol       Date:  2000-02

2.  Ecological impacts of tropical forest fragmentation: how consistent are patterns in species richness and nestedness?

Authors:  Jane K Hill; Michael A Gray; Chey Vun Khen; Suzan Benedick; Noel Tawatao; Keith C Hamer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis.

Authors:  Jaboury Ghazoul
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  T H Ricketts
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants.

Authors:  D H Janzen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition.

Authors:  David H Wright; Bruce D Patterson; Greg M Mikkelson; Alan Cutler; Wirt Atmar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Detecting insect pollinator declines on regional and global scales.

Authors:  Gretchen Lebuhn; Sam Droege; Edward F Connor; Barbara Gemmill-Herren; Simon G Potts; Robert L Minckley; Terry Griswold; Robert Jean; Emanuel Kula; David W Roubik; Jim Cane; Karen W Wright; Gordon Frankie; Frank Parker
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.560

9.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Ramiro Aguilar; Diego P Vázquez; Gretchen LeBuhn; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evolution of altruistic cooperation among nascent multicellular organisms.

Authors:  Jordan G Gulli; Matthew D Herron; William C Ratcliff
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.