Literature DB >> 27909370

Development of a Telephone Interview Version of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Activity Inventory.

Ruth Barclay1, Patricia A Miller2, Sepideh Pooyania3, Paul Stratford2.   

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a telephone version of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Activity Inventory (CMSA-AI) and estimate the test-retest reliability, interrater reliability (between participant and proxy), and construct validity of the scores for individuals with stroke.
Methods: Adults with stroke and their caregivers or proxies were included. Participants were assessed with the CMSA-AI at discharge from a stroke rehabilitation unit and interviewed using the telephone version (TCMSA-AI). Two months after discharge, participants were evaluated with the CMSA-AI and interviewed over the phone using the TCMSA-AI on two occasions 2-3 days apart. Proxies were interviewed with the TCMSA-AI within another 2-3 days.
Results: The mean age of the 53 participants with stroke was 62 years; 59% were male; 43% had right-side hemiparesis; 42 completed follow-up interviews; and 18 had proxies who also participated. Test-retest reliability showed an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99) for the total score, 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.98) for the Gross Motor Function Index, and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.98) for the Walking Index, and an interrater reliability (between participant and proxy) of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.90) for total score. Spearman's rho correlation between CMSA-AI and TCMSA-AI total scores was 0.62 (lower-sided 95% CI: 0.42) at discharge and 0.90 (lower-sided 95% CI: 0.82) at 2 months after discharge. Correlations between the change scores of the CMSA-AI and TCMSA-AI were 0.50 or lower.
Conclusion: There is potential for remote evaluation of the functional mobility of individuals with stroke in research and clinical settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activities of daily living; reproducibility of results; stroke

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909370      PMCID: PMC5125464          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2015-44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  15 in total

1.  Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties?

Authors:  G H Guyatt; B Kirshner; R Jaeschke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Validation of the activity inventory of the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment and the clinical outcome variables scale to evaluate mobility in geriatric clients.

Authors:  Lauren Sacks; Kristen Yee; Maria Huijbregts; Patricia A Miller; Tanya Aggett; Nancy M Salbach
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Self- and proxy-report agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Carod-Artal; Luciane Ferreira Coral; Daniele Stieven Trizotto; Clarissa Menezes Moreira
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Colin Oczkowski; Martin O'Donnell
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Videoconferencing a stroke assessment training workshop: effectiveness, acceptability, and cost.

Authors:  Patricia A Miller; Maria Huijbregts; Esmé French; Denise Taylor; Kirsti Reinikka; Laura Berezny; Sherri Fry; Anna Grunin; Melissa Harvey
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Can they provide valid information about patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J A Hall; J Tognetti; L H Son; L Conant
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Reliability of the clinical outcome variables scale when administered via telephone to assess mobility in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Delena I Amsters; Melissa D Kendall; Kiley J Pershouse; Terry P Haines
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.

Authors:  C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment and modified Barthel Index self-assessment in patients with vascular brain damage.

Authors:  Ladislav Valach; Sandra Signer; Anita Hartmeier; Karin Hofer; Gail Cox Steck
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experiences of stroke survivors and measurement of post stroke participation and activity across seasons-A mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Ruth Barclay; Leanne Leclair; Sandra C Webber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.