Janne A Martikainen1,2, Hannu Kautiainen3,4, Vappu Rantalaiho3,4, Kari T Puolakka3,4. 1. From the Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Unit (PHORU), School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki; Unit of Primary Health Care, Turku University Hospital, Turku; Department of Internal Medicine, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Tampere University Hospital; School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere; South-Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland. janne.martikainen@uef.fi. 2. J.A. Martikainen, PhD, Associate Professor, PHORU, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland; H. Kautiainen, BSc, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, and Unit of Primary Health Care, Turku University Hospital; V. Rantalaiho, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Tampere; K.T. Puolakka, MD, PhD, South-Karelia Central Hospital. janne.martikainen@uef.fi. 3. From the Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Unit (PHORU), School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki; Unit of Primary Health Care, Turku University Hospital, Turku; Department of Internal Medicine, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Tampere University Hospital; School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere; South-Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland. 4. J.A. Martikainen, PhD, Associate Professor, PHORU, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland; H. Kautiainen, BSc, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, and Unit of Primary Health Care, Turku University Hospital; V. Rantalaiho, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Tampere; K.T. Puolakka, MD, PhD, South-Karelia Central Hospital.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the development and potential disproportional distribution of longterm productivity costs (PC) and their determinants leading to work absenteeism and permanent work disability in working-aged patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort of subjects with early RA was created by identifying the new cases of RA from the national drug reimbursement register that had been granted a special reimbursement for their antirheumatic medications for RA from 2000-2007. The dataset was enriched by cross-linking with other national registries detailing work absenteeism days and permanent disability pensions. In the base case, the human capital approach was applied to estimate PC based on subjects' annual number of absenteeism days and incomes. Hurdle regression analysis was applied to study the determinants of PC. RESULTS: Among the 7831 subjects with early RA, the mean (bootstrapped 95% CI) annual PC per person-observation year was €4800 (4547-5070). The annual PC declined after the first year of RA diagnosis, but increased significantly in subsequent years. In addition, the PC was heavily disproportionally concentrated in a small fraction of patients with RA, because only around 20% of patients accounted for the majority of total annual PC. The initiation of active drug treatment during the first 3 months after RA diagnosis significantly reduced the cumulative PC when compared with no drug treatment. CONCLUSION: The longterm PC increased significantly in parallel with years elapsing after RA diagnosis. Further, the majority of these PC are incurred by a small proportion of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the development and potential disproportional distribution of longterm productivity costs (PC) and their determinants leading to work absenteeism and permanent work disability in working-aged patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort of subjects with early RA was created by identifying the new cases of RA from the national drug reimbursement register that had been granted a special reimbursement for their antirheumatic medications for RA from 2000-2007. The dataset was enriched by cross-linking with other national registries detailing work absenteeism days and permanent disability pensions. In the base case, the human capital approach was applied to estimate PC based on subjects' annual number of absenteeism days and incomes. Hurdle regression analysis was applied to study the determinants of PC. RESULTS: Among the 7831 subjects with early RA, the mean (bootstrapped 95% CI) annual PC per person-observation year was €4800 (4547-5070). The annual PC declined after the first year of RA diagnosis, but increased significantly in subsequent years. In addition, the PC was heavily disproportionally concentrated in a small fraction of patients with RA, because only around 20% of patients accounted for the majority of total annual PC. The initiation of active drug treatment during the first 3 months after RA diagnosis significantly reduced the cumulative PC when compared with no drug treatment. CONCLUSION: The longterm PC increased significantly in parallel with years elapsing after RA diagnosis. Further, the majority of these PC are incurred by a small proportion of patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
ABSENTEEISM; COST ANALYSIS; RETIREMENT; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; WORK
Authors: Mary Lucy Marques; Alessia Alunno; Sofia Ramiro; Polina Putrik; Annelies Boonen; Marieke M Ter Wee; Louise Falzon Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-02
Authors: Maaike Ferwerda; Sylvia van Beugen; Henriët van Middendorp; Henk Visser; Harald Vonkeman; Marjonne Creemers; Piet van Riel; Wietske Kievit; Andrea Evers Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 5.428