Rohan Khera1, Paul S Chan2, Michael Donnino2, Saket Girotra2. 1. From Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (R.K.); Saint Luke's Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute, Kansas City, and University of Missouri-Kansas City (P.S.C.); Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.D.); Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.D.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City (S.G.). rohan.khera@utsouthwestern.edu rohankhera@outlook.com. 2. From Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (R.K.); Saint Luke's Mid America Heart and Vascular Institute, Kansas City, and University of Missouri-Kansas City (P.S.C.); Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.D.); Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.D.); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City (S.G.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests attributable to nonshockable rhythms, delays in epinephrine administration beyond 5 minutes is associated with worse survival. However, the extent of hospital variation in delayed epinephrine administration and its effect on hospital-level outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Within Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation, we identified 103 932 adult patients (≥18 years) at 548 hospitals with an in-hospital cardiac arrest attributable to a nonshockable rhythm who received at least 1 dose of epinephrine between 2000 and 2014. We constructed 2-level hierarchical regression models to quantify hospital variation in rates of delayed epinephrine administration (>5 minutes) and its association with hospital rates of survival to discharge and survival with functional recovery. RESULTS: Overall, 13 213 (12.7%) patients had delays to epinephrine, and this rate varied markedly across hospitals (range, 0%-53.8%). The odds of delay in epinephrine administration were 58% higher at 1 randomly selected hospital in comparison with a similar patient at another randomly selected hospital (median odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.64). The median risk-standardized survival rate was 12.0% (range, 5.4%-31.9%), and the risk-standardized survival with functional recovery was 7.4% (range, 0.9%-30.8%). There was an inverse correlation between a hospital's rate of delayed epinephrine administration and its risk-standardized rate of survival to discharge (ρ=-0.22, P<0.0001) and survival with functional recovery (ρ=-0.14, P=0.001). In comparison with a median survival rate of 12.9% (interquartile range, 11.1%-15.4%) at hospitals in the lowest quartile of epinephrine delay, risk-standardized survival was 16% lower at hospitals in the quartile with the highest rate of epinephrine delays (10.8%; interquartile range, 9.7%-12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in epinephrine administration following in-hospital cardiac arrest are common and variy across hospitals. Hospitals with high rates of delayed epinephrine administration had lower rates of overall survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest attributable to nonshockable rhythm. Further studies are needed to determine whether improving hospital performance on time to epinephrine administration, especially at hospitals with poor performance on this metric, will lead to improved outcomes.
BACKGROUND: For patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests attributable to nonshockable rhythms, delays in epinephrine administration beyond 5 minutes is associated with worse survival. However, the extent of hospital variation in delayed epinephrine administration and its effect on hospital-level outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Within Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation, we identified 103 932 adult patients (≥18 years) at 548 hospitals with an in-hospital cardiac arrest attributable to a nonshockable rhythm who received at least 1 dose of epinephrine between 2000 and 2014. We constructed 2-level hierarchical regression models to quantify hospital variation in rates of delayed epinephrine administration (>5 minutes) and its association with hospital rates of survival to discharge and survival with functional recovery. RESULTS: Overall, 13 213 (12.7%) patients had delays to epinephrine, and this rate varied markedly across hospitals (range, 0%-53.8%). The odds of delay in epinephrine administration were 58% higher at 1 randomly selected hospital in comparison with a similar patient at another randomly selected hospital (median odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.64). The median risk-standardized survival rate was 12.0% (range, 5.4%-31.9%), and the risk-standardized survival with functional recovery was 7.4% (range, 0.9%-30.8%). There was an inverse correlation between a hospital's rate of delayed epinephrine administration and its risk-standardized rate of survival to discharge (ρ=-0.22, P<0.0001) and survival with functional recovery (ρ=-0.14, P=0.001). In comparison with a median survival rate of 12.9% (interquartile range, 11.1%-15.4%) at hospitals in the lowest quartile of epinephrine delay, risk-standardized survival was 16% lower at hospitals in the quartile with the highest rate of epinephrine delays (10.8%; interquartile range, 9.7%-12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in epinephrine administration following in-hospital cardiac arrest are common and variy across hospitals. Hospitals with high rates of delayed epinephrine administration had lower rates of overall survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest attributable to nonshockable rhythm. Further studies are needed to determine whether improving hospital performance on time to epinephrine administration, especially at hospitals with poor performance on this metric, will lead to improved outcomes.
Authors: Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Mark S Link; Steven L Kronick; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Joseph P Ornato; Bryan McNally; Scott M Silvers; Rod S Passman; Roger D White; Erik P Hess; Wanchun Tang; Daniel Davis; Elizabeth Sinz; Laurie J Morrison Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mark S Link; Lauren C Berkow; Peter J Kudenchuk; Henry R Halperin; Erik P Hess; Vivek K Moitra; Robert W Neumar; Brian J O'Neil; James H Paxton; Scott M Silvers; Roger D White; Demetris Yannopoulos; Michael W Donnino Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Saket Girotra; Sean van Diepen; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Margaret Carrel; Kimberly Vellano; Monique L Anderson; Bryan McNally; Benjamin S Abella; Comilla Sasson; Paul S Chan Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul S Chan; Robert A Berg; John A Spertus; Lee H Schwamm; Deepak L Bhatt; Gregg C Fonarow; Paul A Heidenreich; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Fengming Tang; Raina M Merchant Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael W Donnino; Justin D Salciccioli; Michael D Howell; Michael N Cocchi; Brandon Giberson; Katherine Berg; Shiva Gautam; Clifton Callaway Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-05-20
Authors: Krishna K Patel; John A Spertus; Yevgeniy Khariton; Yuanyuan Tang; Lesley H Curtis; Paul S Chan Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew Hansen; Robert H Schmicker; Craig D Newgard; Brian Grunau; Frank Scheuermeyer; Sheldon Cheskes; Veer Vithalani; Fuad Alnaji; Thomas Rea; Ahamed H Idris; Heather Herren; Jamie Hutchison; Mike Austin; Debra Egan; Mohamud Daya Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rohan Khera; Ambarish Pandey; Thomas Koshy; Colby Ayers; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Sandeep R Das; Mark H Drazner; Michael E Jessen; Ajay J Kirtane; Timothy J Gardner; James A de Lemos; Deepak L Bhatt; Dharam J Kumbhani Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Rohan Khera; John A Spertus; Monique A Starks; Yuanyuan Tang; Steven M Bradley; Saket Girotra; Paul S Chan Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Paolo Angelini; Benjamin Y Cheong; Veronica V Lenge De Rosen; Alberto Lopez; Carlo Uribe; Anthony H Masso; Syed W Ali; Barry R Davis; Raja Muthupillai; James T Willerson Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2018-08-01
Authors: Vittal Hejjaji; Ali O Malik; Poghni A Peri-Okonny; Merrill Thomas; Yuanyuan Tang; David Wooldridge; John A Spertus; Paul S Chan Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 4.773