Abigail H M Morbi1, Sophie Coles2, Mostafa Albayati1, Ian M Nordon1, Cliff Shearman3. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; University Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. 2. University Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; University Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: cps@soton.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intermittent claudication has a major impact on the quality of life and functional ability of the patient. However, when treating these patients, management is largely influenced by vascular surgeons' perceptions of risk. There is little information available regarding the level of risk that patients perceive to be acceptable, when considering complications of treatment. This study investigates patients' acceptance of risk associated with current management options for intermittent claudication and explores factors associated with greater risk acceptance. METHODS: Patients with confirmed intermittent claudication presenting to vascular clinic and supervised exercise classes were surveyed in a single-center prospective study. A standard gamble-type method was used to measure patients' acceptance of risk associated with medical treatment, angioplasty, and surgical bypass. Level of risk acceptance was correlated to patient factors. RESULTS: Fifty patients were surveyed; 74% were male, median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-74), maximal walking distance was 100 m (IQR 70-200), and ankle-brachial pressure index was 0.65 (IQR 0.60-0.78). Median risk acceptance for treatment failure was 70% for medical treatment, 50% for angioplasty, and 40% for surgical bypass. Median risk acceptance for major amputation and death was 0% for all 3 management options. Claudicants with maximal walking distance <100 m accepted higher risk of treatment failure (P = 0.0005 for medical treatment, P = 0.0038 for angioplasty), and death with medical treatment (P = 0.0009). There was no significance between claudication distance and risk acceptance of major amputation with any treatment modality or death with angioplasty or surgical bypass. There was no significant correlation among level of risk acceptance and age, gender, or diabetic status. CONCLUSIONS: Claudicants are prepared to accept significant risk of treatment failure, in order to gain benefit, but regardless of claudication distance, patients have low acceptance of the risk of amputation or death. Patient acceptance of risk should be considered when planning management.
BACKGROUND:Intermittent claudication has a major impact on the quality of life and functional ability of the patient. However, when treating these patients, management is largely influenced by vascular surgeons' perceptions of risk. There is little information available regarding the level of risk that patients perceive to be acceptable, when considering complications of treatment. This study investigates patients' acceptance of risk associated with current management options for intermittent claudication and explores factors associated with greater risk acceptance. METHODS:Patients with confirmed intermittent claudication presenting to vascular clinic and supervised exercise classes were surveyed in a single-center prospective study. A standard gamble-type method was used to measure patients' acceptance of risk associated with medical treatment, angioplasty, and surgical bypass. Level of risk acceptance was correlated to patient factors. RESULTS: Fifty patients were surveyed; 74% were male, median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-74), maximal walking distance was 100 m (IQR 70-200), and ankle-brachial pressure index was 0.65 (IQR 0.60-0.78). Median risk acceptance for treatment failure was 70% for medical treatment, 50% for angioplasty, and 40% for surgical bypass. Median risk acceptance for major amputation and death was 0% for all 3 management options. Claudicants with maximal walking distance <100 m accepted higher risk of treatment failure (P = 0.0005 for medical treatment, P = 0.0038 for angioplasty), and death with medical treatment (P = 0.0009). There was no significance between claudication distance and risk acceptance of major amputation with any treatment modality or death with angioplasty or surgical bypass. There was no significant correlation among level of risk acceptance and age, gender, or diabetic status. CONCLUSIONS: Claudicants are prepared to accept significant risk of treatment failure, in order to gain benefit, but regardless of claudication distance, patients have low acceptance of the risk of amputation or death. Patient acceptance of risk should be considered when planning management.