| Literature DB >> 27907985 |
Mohammadhiwa Abdekhoda1,2, Afsaneh Dehnad3, Mahmood Yousefi4.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the efficiency of delivering a 4-month course of "effective literature search" among medical postgraduate students for improving information literacy skills. This was a cross-sectional study in which 90 postgraduate students were randomly selected and participated in 12 training sessions. Effective search strategies were presented and the students' attitude and competency concerning online search were measured by a pre- and post-questionnaires and skill tests. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 16 using t-test. There was a significant improvement (p=0.00), in student's attitude. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) was 2.9 (0.8) before intervention versus the mean (SD) 3.9 (0.7) after intervention. Students' familiarity with medical resources and databases improved significantly. The data showed a significant increase (p=0.03), in students' competency score concerning search strategy design and conducting a search. The mean (SD) was 2.04 (0.7) before intervention versus the mean (SD) 3.07 (0.8) after intervention. Also, students' ability in applying search and meta search engine improved significantly. This study clearly acknowledges that the training intervention provides considerable opportunity to improve medical student's information literacy skills.Entities:
Keywords: Education; Health services; Information literacy; Medical students; Online search
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27907985 PMCID: PMC5138574 DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2016.44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Med Educ ISSN: 2005-727X
Demographic Details of the Students Participated in the Present Study
| Component | Item no. | Item |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude toward online literature searching | 1 | Search and retrieval of information is often difficult and a burden to me. |
| 2 | I have the skills necessary for searching and finding relevant information. | |
| 3 | Most of the time, I am successful in searching and finding relevant information in my field of study. | |
| 4 | Finding articles and scientific information from the internet and databases requires certain skills and expertise. | |
| Familiarity with medical resources and databases | 6 | I am familiar with databases providing full-text articles. |
| 7 | I am familiar with databases relevant to my fields of study and I can name them. | |
| 8 | I begin the search for retrieval of information from the specific relevant data basis in my field of study I am familiar with. | |
| 9 | I am familiar with scientific portals and vortals and I use them in my search. | |
| 10 | I am familiar with electronic databases and I know how to access them. | |
| Ability to design search strategy and conduct a search | 14 | I can formulate and develop the search question in finding information. |
| 15 | I can apply "phrase searching" and "filtering" in searching databases. | |
| 17 | I can use and apply medical subject headings (MeSH). | |
| 18 | I can modify the results of the search very well. | |
| Ability to applying search and meta search engine | 19 | I can work with search engines such as Google, Yahoo, and Bing. |
| 20 | I can work with specific search engines to find relevant information in a specific field. | |
| 21 | I can work with meta search engines such as Mama and Dogpile, in search. | |
| 22 | I can work with search directories such as Yahoo and Vivisimo and usually use them in search. |
Demographic Information of the Participants
| Demographic | Category | Frequency | Percent | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 10 | 11.11 | ||
| Female | 78 | 86.60 | |||
| Missing | 2 | 2.20 | |||
| Total | 90 | 100 | |||
| Age (yr) | 22–25 | 16 | 17.77 | 27.8 | 2.3 |
| 25–30 | 54 | 60 | |||
| 30–35 | 13 | 14.44 | |||
| Missing | 7 | 7.70 | |||
| Total | 90 | 100 | |||
| Grade | MSc | 58 | 64.40 | ||
| PhD | 32 | 35.50 | |||
| Missing | 0 | 0 | |||
| Total | 90 | 100 |
MSc: Master of sciences, PhD: Doctor of philosophy.
Students Competency Score across Online Literature Searching before and after Intervention
| Component | Before intervention | After intervention | Paired samples test | Result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | t | p-value | ||
| Attitude toward online literature searching | 2.90 | 0.85 | 3.92 | 0.7 | -9.24 | 0.00 | Significant |
| Familiarity with medical resources and databases | 3.01 | 0.93 | 4.02 | 0.9 | -8.39 | 0.00 | Significant |
| Ability to design search strategy and conduct a search | 2.04 | 0.72 | 3.07 | 0.8 | -7.24 | 0.03 | Significant |
| Ability to applying search and meta search engine | 3.02 | 0.94 | 4.50 | 0.9 | -8.76 | 0.04 | Significant |
SD: Standard deviation.