Literature DB >> 27907023

Field Trials Reveal Ecotype-Specific Responses to Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Rice.

Abdala Gamby Diedhiou1,2,3, Fatou Kine Mbaye1,2,3, Daouda Mbodj2,4, Mathieu Ndigue Faye2,3, Sarah Pignoly2,3,5, Ibrahima Ndoye1,2,3, Koffi Djaman2,4, Souleymane Gaye2,4, Aboubacry Kane1,2,3, Laurent Laplaze2,3,5, Baboucarr Manneh2,4, Antony Champion2,3,5.   

Abstract

The overuse of agricultural chemicals such as fertilizer and pesticides aimed at increasing crop yield results in environmental damage, particularly in the Sahelian zone where soils are fragile. Crop inoculation with beneficial soil microbes appears as a good alternative for reducing agricultural chemical needs, especially for small farmers. This, however, requires selecting optimal combinations of crop varieties and beneficial microbes tested in field conditions. In this study, we investiclass="Species">gated the resclass="Chemical">ponse of class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice plants to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) under screenhouse and field conditions in two consecutive seasons in Senegal. Evaluation of single and mixed inoculations with AMF and PGPB was conducted on rice (Oryza sativa) variety Sahel 202, on sterile soil under screenhouse conditions. We observed that inoculated plants, especially plants treated with AMF, grew taller, matured earlier and had higher grain yield than the non-inoculated plants. Mixed inoculation trials with two AMF strains were then conducted under irrigated field conditions with four O. sativa varieties, two O. glaberrima varieties and two interspecific NERICA varieties, belonging to 3 ecotypes (upland, irrigated, and rainfed lowland). We observed that the upland varieties had the best responses to inoculation, especially with regards to grain yield, harvest index and spikelet fertility. These results show the potential of using AMF to improve rice production with less chemical fertilizers and present new opportunities for the genetic improvement in rice to transfer the ability of forming beneficial rice-microbe associations into high yielding varieties in order to increase further rice yield potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27907023      PMCID: PMC5132163          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

class="Species">Rice (Oryza saliva L.) is one of the oldest staclass="Chemical">ple croclass="Chemical">ps in the world [1], and the main source of calories for more than half of humanity [2]. To meet global needs, a 40% increase in class="Chemical">production of class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice must be achieved in the next 20 years on limited and increasingly degraded arable lands and in an unstable global climate context [3-4]. Sub-Saharan Africa is largely dependent on rice import for its food security. Incentive policies were set up to increase local rice production with three objectives: creation and dissemination of high-yielding varieties, development of irrigation facilities and availability of inorganic fertilizers. In countries such as Senegal, this has led to increased crop yields and quality [5-6]. However, the yields are still low [7] and the prohibitive cost and environmental problems caused by chemical inputs [8-10] support the search for new sustainable strategies to promote soil fertility and improve rice production. These approaches include the application of organic fertilizers, the use of nitrogen-fixing green manure (Azolla sp., fallow legumes) and of beneficial rhizospheric microorganisms such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) and the selection of root systems for improved water and nutrient acquisition [4]. The arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) sclass="Chemical">ymbiosis is a mutual relationshiclass="Chemical">p between class="Chemical">plant roots and soil fungi belonging to the Glomeromycota [11]. In exchange for an allocation of class="Chemical">plant class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">carbon, the fungal partner provides water and minerals it collects in the soil to the plant [12]. The fungus creates a complex network of hyphae specialized in the absorption of minerals such as phosphorus and nitrogen in the soil and chimeric organs called arbuscules in the plant root cell that allow the exchange of resources with the plant host [13]. Through this symbiosis, plant species are able to exploit soil niches previously inaccessible [14]. In addition, the fungus improves the adaptability and resilience of its host to occasional or prolonged abiotic and biotic stress conditions [15-16]. Numerous studies have shown that mycorrhizal symbiosis induced significant changes in plant host architecture [17], and harvest index in rice in lab conditions [18]. However, AM symbiosis occurrence and plant responsiveness depend on environmental conditions, and specific plant and fungus combinations [19-22]. Exploiting the AM symbiosis potential for rice thus requires the selection of suitable combination of cultivar, fungus and agriculture practice. Moreover, co-inoculation with other beneficial microorganisms such as PGPB could positively improve AM symbiosis formation and functioning. Positive effects of PGPB on soil fertility and crop yield are well documented [23-24], and include mobilization of mineral or organic bound nutrients [25-27] and biological nitrogen fixation [28-29]. In rice, the impact of simple inoculations with AM fungi, diazotroph bacteria such as rhizobia and actinomycetes has been reported [29-30], but little is known about co-inoculation of consortia of such different plant growth promoting microorganisms [31]. Moreover, these studies have been performed in pot experiments but rice response to inoculation in field conditions is poorly documented. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the responsiveness of class="Species">rice to different combinations of four inoculants (AM fungi: class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Glomus aggregatum and Rhizophagus irregulare and PGPB: Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS 278 and Leifsonia sp. ORS 3454), (2) to identify the most effective inoculants combination, and (3) to test this combination in field experiments on eight varieties of rice.

Materials and Methods

Soil and plant materials

Pot trials were carried out twice (July 2013 and July 2015) with the same treatments in a screenhouse. The treatments consisted of non-inoculated and inoculated plants of class="Species">rice (class="Chemical">pan class="Species">O. sativa) variety Sahel 202 with two AMF and two strains of PGPB applied as simple and mixed inoculants. The soil used was collected from class="Species">rice fields in Djibelor (12°33' N, 16°19' W) in the Casamance region of Seneclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">gal. The rice fields are privately owned lands, and permission to collect soil samples was obtained from the owners. The collected soil contained 1.32% total C, 0.08% total N, and 710 ppm total P. It was sieved with 2 mm sieves, sterilized twice at 180°C for 2 h and placed into plastic pots (1000 g of soil per pot). Seeds of class="Species">O. sativa Sahel 202, were surface-sterilized in 8.4% class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">NaClO for 1 min and then 30 s in 90% ethanol, and washed 5 times in sterile, distilled water after each treatment. For pre-germination, seeds were put on moist filter paper under sterile conditions and placed in the dark (at 25°C). One day-old seedlings were planted in plastic pots (3 grains per pot) containing the culture substrate. Seedlings were thinned to one plant per pot two weeks after planting.

Fungal materials and AMF inoculum production

The AM fungi used in this study were class="Disease">Glomus aggregatum Schenck & Smith (DAOM 227128, National Mycological Herbarium, Ottawa, Canada) and class="Chemical">pan class="Disease">Rhizophagus irregularis Walker & Schüßler (previously called Glomus intraradices DAOM 197198; [32]). They were propagated as pure cultures in a greenhouse using a mycotrophic plant (Zea mays) and sterilized (2 x 2 h at 180°C) soil from Sangalkam (Senegal) consisting of 88.8% sand, 5.8% silt, 5.4% clay, 0.6% organic matter, 0.3% total C, 0.02% total N, 333.5 ppm total K, and 41.4 ppm total P. After 3 months, maize roots and culture substrate were collected to assess spore density [33] and the length of root colonized by AMF [34]. The colonized maize roots were cut into ~1 cm fragments and thoroughly homogenized to the culture substrate to constitute the AMF inoculum. For each AMF strain, the inoculum consisted of a mixture of sandy soil, spores (~500 / 100g of soil) and mycorrhizal root fragments (~70% of colonization rate).

Bacterial materials and PGPB inoculum production

The bacterial strains used in this study were class="Chemical">ORS278 and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">ORS3454 identified as Bradyrhizobium sp. [35] and Leifsonia sp. (99% of 16S rDNA sequence similarity with Leifsonia shenshuensis; Diégane Diouf, personal communication), respectively. The photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium sp. strain ORS278, was isolated from the aquatic legume, Aeschynomene sensitiva, in the Casamance region of Senegal [35]. The Leifsonia sp. strain ORS3454 was collected from pond water harboring wild rice plants (Oryza barthii) at Ndiaffate (Kaolack, Senegal; Diégane Diouf, personal communication). The plant growth promoting potential of the bacterial strain ORS278 has been reported [36-37], while that of the strain ORS3454 is under investigation. For each bacterial strain, a liquid culture (36°C, 180 rpm) in 500 ml of yeast extract-mannitol (YM) medium [38] was prepared from 1 ml of pre-culture from a single colony. In early stationary phase (2 and 6 days of culture for ORS3454 and ORS278 respectively) liquid cultures were centrifugated at 8000 rpm for 10 min. Bacterial pellets were washed 3 times (8000 rpm, 10 min) and suspended with sterile physiological water (8770 ppm NaCl, 270 ppm KH2PO4, 710 ppm Na2PO4) for plant inoculation.

Seedling inoculations and experimental design

The inoculation experiment was made as follows: (a) simple and mixed inoculations with class="Chemical">PGPB, abbreviated as class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">ORS278, ORS3454, and ORS278 + ORS3454; (b) simple and mixed inoculations with AMF, R. irregularis (Ri), G. aggregatum (Ga), and Ga + Ri; (c) 9 mixed inoculations with AMF and PGPB; and (d) a control represented by the non-inoculated plants. Ten replicates were performed for each of the sixteen treatments arranged randomly in a screenhouse. At planting time, 20 g of class="Chemical">AMF inoculum were class="Chemical">placed at a declass="Chemical">pth of ~4 cm in the center of class="Chemical">pots and thoroughly mixed with sterilized soil. For the treatment with both class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">AMF inoculants (Ga + Ri), 10 g of each were put in each pot. The treatments without AMF received an equivalent amount of sterilized inoculum (2 x 2 h at 180°C). Inoculation with class="Chemical">PGPB was class="Chemical">performed 3 weeks after sowing, when class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice plants reached the 4 leaves stage. At this stage, plants produce sufficient root exudates [39] to allow the development and maintenance of a rhizospheric bacteria population [40]. Before inoculation with PGPB, rice plants were exposed to water stress for 36 h to promote the absorption of bacterial inoculum in the rhizosphere. For each PGPB treatment, 10 ml of bacterial suspension (108 CFU) were carefully instilled on seedling roots. The treatment with both PGPB inoculants (ORS3454 + ORS278) concomitantly received 5 ml suspension of each strain. The plants without PGPB inoculation received 10 ml of sterile physiological water. To avoid inoculum leaching, plant watering was resumed 18h later. A second inoculation with PGPB was performed 5 weeks after sowing to ensure the successful implementation of selected bacteria populations. In screenhouse experiments, rice plants were watered regularly with tap water to field capacity.

Measurement of plant morphological and yield traits

Plant height and cross-sectional area of the stem base were measured every week for 3 weeks after sowing. Plant height was determined from the base of the main shoot to the tip of the longest leaf. Because pan class="Species">rice class="Chemical">plants have an aclass="Chemical">pclass="Chemical">proximate elliclass="Chemical">psoidal stem base [41], the cross-sectional area was determined by measuring the diameters of long and short axis at the base of stem and aclass="Chemical">pclass="Chemical">plying the formula S = πDxDy / 4, where S is the cross-sectional area of the stem base, Dx and Dy are the diameters of long and short axis of the stem base, resclass="Chemical">pectively. To reduce the bias related to heterogeneous seedling emergence, average increases of height and cross-sectional area of the stem base from the first date of measurement were considered. The average of heading and maturity dates were determined for each treatment, and expressed in days after sowing (DAS). In this study, an experimental unit was considered to start heading if at least one panicle emerges from the leaf sheath. It reaches maturity when 80% of all of its spikelets are ripe. For each experimental unit, individual plants were harvested at maturity, and the panicles were weighed after air-drying in a room at 25°C to a constant weight.

AMF colonization estimation

Roots were harvested and thoroughly washed with tap class="Chemical">water. Large lateral roots which are more likely to form mycorrhizas [17] were collected, cleared in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">KOH (10% (w/v)) at 80°C for 30 min, and stained with trypan blue (0.05% (w/v) in 0.8% acid acetic solution) at 80°C for 35 min (adapted from Phillips and Hayman, [42]). Frequency of colonization and percentage of root length colonized by AMF were assessed for each treatment following the method used by Trouvelot, [34].

Field experiments

Field trials were carried out in two consecutive years (September 2013 to January 2014 and September 2014 to January 2015), at the Africaclass="Species">Rice Sahel Station at Ndiaye (16°14' N, 16°14' W), with the class="Chemical">permission from the Africaclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">Rice Sahel Station Director. Treatments consisted of non-inoculated and inoculated plants of 8 rice varieties: 4 O. sativa (Sahel 108, Sahel 202, IR 64 and WAB 56–104), two O. glaberrima (TOG 5681 and CG 14) and two interspecific varieties (NERICA 4 and NERICA–L-19). The ecotype and some agronomic traits of the different varieties are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Ecotype and some agronomic traits of rice cultivars used in the present study.

VarietySpecies / ParentsEcotypeDays to 50% maturity1000GWT (g)Potential yield (t/ha)
Sahel 108O. sativa indicaIrrigated (Irr)105–12023–2410
Sahel 202O. sativa indicaIrrigated (Irr)1152711
IR 64O. sativa indicaIrrigated (Irr)118264–5
WAB 56–104O. sativa japonicaUpland (Upl)105314
TOG 5681O. glaberrimaRainfed lowland (Rll)ndndnd
CG 14O. glaberrimaUpland (Upl)ndndnd
NERICA 4O. sativa japonica x O. glaberrima (WAB 56–104 / CG 14 // 2*WAB 56–104)Upland (Upl)95–100295
NERICA–L-19O. glaberrima x O. sativa indica (TOG 5681/3*IR 64)Rainfed lowland (Rll)140238

1000GWT: 1000 grain weight.

1000GWT: 1000 grain weight. For each class="Species">rice variety, inoculation of seedlings was class="Chemical">performed in nursery as follows: 3 class="Chemical">pre-germinated seeds were class="Chemical">planted in each class="Chemical">pot (4cm x 4cm x 4cm) of multi-class="Chemical">pot class="Chemical">plates filled with a mixture of 20 g of class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Ga + Ri inoculum and 20 g of sterilized Sangalkam soil. Twelve days after planting, non-inoculated (planted in multi-pot plates with the sterilized mixture) and inoculated seedlings were sampled to check the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizae in each rice variety. AMF structures were observed in roots of all inoculated seedlings, while AMF colonization was not observed in the non-inoculated plants. 13 day-old mycorrhized and non-mycorrhized seedlings were transferred in field plots, according to a split-plot design with 3 replications: the block with inoculated seedlings and that with non-inoculated seedlings were considered as main plots, and the 8 rice varieties were assigned to subplots. Thus, 24 (8 varieties x 3 replications) experimental units of 0.48 m2 each were set up in both blocks with inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings. In each experimental unit, 12 seedlings were transplanted and maintained in irrigated conditions with 20 x 20 cm spacing and one plant per hill. Both blocks with inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings were treated with fertilizers as recommended: 130 kg/ha of class="Chemical">DAP, 100kg/ha of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">KCl NPK (23kg of N– 60 kg of P2O5–60 kg of K2O) and 10 kg/ha of zinc were applied two weeks after transplanting. 276 kg/ha of urea (46-0-0 NPK) was applied in three split applications: 40% at early tillering (2 weeks after transplanting), 40% at panicle initiation (4 to 6 weeks after transplanting) and 20% at booting stage (9 weeks after transplanting). Four class="Species">rice hills in the center of each subclass="Chemical">plot were harvested at maturity and the following agronomic traits were assessed: class="Chemical">plants height, number of tillers, grain yield and 1000 grain weight (both exclass="Chemical">pressed at 14% moisture), aboveground biomass (at 14% moisture), harvest index (HI, defined as the ratio of grain yield to aboveground biomass), sclass="Chemical">pikelet fertility (defined as the ratio of the number of filled sclass="Chemical">pikelets to the total number of sclass="Chemical">pikelets), and grain filling duration (GFD, defined as the class="Chemical">period between flowering and class="Chemical">physiological maturity). The days to 50% heading (defined as the time when 50% of the class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice plants had exserted their panicles) and to 80% maturity (when 80% of grains had lost green color) were also recorded.

Data analysis

In the screenhouse experiments, root length and frequency of colonization, heading, maturity and panicle weight were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with inoculum (control, simple and mixed inoculants) as factor. In the field experiments, a three-way ANOVA was performed to analyze for effects of inoculation (control and class="Chemical">AMF), year of trial (1st year and 2nd year) and class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice variety (each of the 8 varieties tested) or rice ecotype (upland, irrigated and rainfed lowland) on the 10 agronomic traits; while differences between two sample means were determined by a Student’s t-test. Prior to analysis, data were ln (x + 10) transformed to meet assumptions of normality, and significant differences in means were determined at P<0.05 using the XLSAT™ software package (2010 version, Addinsoft). For each class="Species">rice variety, the mycorrhizal inoculation effect (MIE, class="Chemical">pan class="Species">indicating the effect of introduced AMF inoculum compared with the inherent field inoculums), was calculated for each agronomic trait as follows: MIE = (mean value of inoculated plants–mean value of non-inoculated plants) / mean value of inoculated plants. MIE varies between -1 and 1. For morphological traits, a positive MIE indicates that the plants benefited from introduced AMF inoculum, while a negative MIE means that the costs for the introduced AMF are higher than mycorrhizal benefit. To examine ecotype-specific responses to AMF inoculation, a Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on a Bray-Curtis similarity measure was performed using the MIE values for agronomic traits that showed significant AMF inoculation x ecotype interaction in ANOVA. Similarity percentages (SIMPER) analysis on the basis of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities was than conducted to identify the agronomic traits that contributed most to the differences recorded between rice ecotypes in terms of response to inoculation with AMF, by using the PAST software package (version 3.12).

Results

AMF inoculation increases rice growth and hastens maturity

We first assessed the responsiveness of the class="Species">rice Sahel 202 variety to different AM fungi and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PGPB combination in pot experiments. In two independent trials, no AMF colonization was observed in the roots of non-inoculated plants, whereas typical AM structures such as arbuscules, hyphae and vesicles were observed within the roots of plants inoculated with one or the two AMF strains (G. aggregatum and R. irregularis) alone or in combination with PGPR strains (Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS278 and Leifsonia sp. ORS3454). Spores and typical Rhizophagus endospores were also observed (Fig 1). Combination of the fungal strains or co-inoculations with PGPB did not increase AMF colonization (S1 Table).
Fig 1

Roots of O. sativa var. Sahel 202 with and without AMF structures.

Roots free of AMF structures (A); root fragment colonized by G. aggregatum, with extraradical spores (B); root fragment colonized by R. irregularis presenting typical endospores (C); and root fragment colonized by G. aggregatum, with arbuscules (D).

Roots of O. sativa var. Sahel 202 with and without AMF structures.

Roots free of class="Chemical">AMF structures (A); root fragment colonized by class="Chemical">pan class="Species">G. aggregatum, with extraradical spores (B); root fragment colonized by R. irregularis presenting typical endospores (C); and root fragment colonized by G. aggregatum, with arbuscules (D). Independent trials revealed that microbial inoculations had a positive effect on class="Species">rice growth in class="Chemical">pot (S1 and S2 Figs). Moreover, simclass="Chemical">ple and mixed inoculants including at least one class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">AMF significantly hastened heading and maturity of O. sativa Sahel 202 plants and significantly increased panicle weight. By contrast, simple and mixed bacterial inoculants had no significant effects on these traits (Table 2). Hence, in pot experiments, inoculation of O. sativa Sahel 202 variety with a combination of AMF strains increased both rice plant height and vigor and reduced the duration of the growth cycle.
Table 2

O. sativa var. Sahel 202 heading and maturity dates and panicle weight for the 1st and 2nd year trials.

Heading (DAS)Maturity (DAS)Panicle weight (mg)
Traitment1st year2nd year1st year2nd year1st year2nd year
Control126.83 a130.00 ab151.00 ab157.00 a699.10 d688.57 de
ORS278123.50 a125.13 abc152.33 a153.00 abc1006.20 cd608.89 e
ORS3454115.89 ab130.00 ab143.00 abc155.40 ab1134.80 bcd656.25 e
ORS278 + ORS3454119.25 a121.63 bcd147.17 abc153.00 abc1129.90 bcd922.22 cde
Ri95.78 c128.00 abc136.25 cd153.00 abc1854.90 abc904.44 cde
Ri + ORS27896.00 de113.40 de144.22 abc140.70 de1647.30 abc1077.00 abc
Ri + ORS3454101.00 cd112.00 ef154.40 a137.90 ef1733.50 abc918.00 cde
Ri + ORS278 + ORS3454106.33 bc109.20 ef137.62 bcd135.10 ef1727.80 abc1035.00 bc
Ga101.60 cd105.00 f138.22 bcd133.78 f1872.70 abc1325.00 ab
Ga + ORS278103.11 cd105.00 f136.33 cd140.70 de1658.60 abc1386.00 a
Ga + ORS345498.20 cd109.20 ef136.00 cd140.70 de2271.60 a1092.00 abc
Ga + ORS278 + ORS345492.17 de106.40 ef128.83 de137.20 ef2134.10 a1334.00 ab
Ga + Ri89.00 e112.00 ef122.00 e140.00 def1942.20 ab917.00 cde
Ga + Ri + ORS27897.44 cde104.30 f139.00 bcd133.78 f1709.40 abc867.00 cde
Ga + Ri + ORS345498.22 cde120.56 cd131.00 de146.22 cd2026.30 a1091.11 abc
Ga + Ri + ORS278 + ORS3454101.29 cd110.60 ef130.20 de138.60 ef2155.50 a1021.25 bcd

In each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P≤0.05. DAS: days after sowing.

In each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P≤0.05. DAS: days after sowing.

AMF inoculation impacts agronomic traits of rice varieties in irrigated field conditions

We next tested the impact of class="Chemical">AMF inoculation on 8 varieties of class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice corresponding to different species (four O. sativa, two O. glaberrima and two interspecific NERICA) and ecotypes (upland, irrigated and rainfed lowland) in field conditions. The analysis of grain yield revealed a significant interaction between inoculation with AMF and rice variety (P < 0.000), which itself depended on year of trial (P = 0.001 for AMF x variety x year interaction, S2 Table). In the first year trial, only two upland rice varieties, NERICA 4 and O. sativa WAB56-104, showed significant increase in grain yield when inoculated with AMF (Table 3 and S3 Table), with strong positive MIE (0.80 and 0.52, respectively; Fig 2). In the second year trial, significant differences in grain yield between the inoculated and non-inoculated plants were obtained in 6 rice varieties (Table 3 and S3 Table), with positive MIE in two upland rice varieties (NERICA 4 and O. glaberrima CG14), and two irrigated rice varieties (O. sativa IR64 and Sahel 202), and negative MIE in the rainfed lowland variety NERICA-L-19 and the irrigated variety Sahel 108 (Fig 2).
Table 3

Agronomic traits of inoculated and non-inoculated plants of the 8 rice varieties cultivated under irrigated filed conditions.

TreatYield (Kg/ha)Biomass (Kg/ha)HI (%)1000GWT (g)Height (cm)Tillers numbHeading (DAS)Maturity (DAS)GFD (Days)Fertility (%)
NERICA4AM-13730 a8648 a52 a2810216575 a1073280
NM-10734 b5063 b15 b2610215266 b0973127
WAB56-104AM-12438 a541152 a3287123731123973
NM-11169 b435428 b2585167731073454
CG14AM-136461025245291023367399 a2676 a
NM-143551264634301063817596 b2064 b
IR64AM-148341265746 a25 a78346811123164
NM-153401366739 b23 b79334781123456
Sahel202AM-1493817792342778302841102660
NM-1518015250342188378841082349
Sahel108AM-141881148645197828679981874
NM-143781058442197726576982260
NERICA-L-19AM-1562514709462387279911142374
NM-1644014084472882294871112461
TOG5681AM-143340962354267730369962766
NM-149051185542327140969962765
NERICA4AM-24631 a109064424100325741053189 a
NM-22862 b080793623103204741053171 b
WAB56-104AM-2328307810422684317731063380
NM-2329011378302488275731063374
CG14AM-25103 a127194019099540 a741022887
NM-23904 b181042521100410 b701013186
IR64AM-26104 a142634324 a80483981303193
NM-24236 b115253719 b81463981303188
Sahel202AM-25234 a25274212194500 a911253391
NM-23953 b15028312284304 b911253387
Sahel108AM-27692 b13756 b57 a1880438 b751063192 a
NM-28959 a20868 a43 b2579579 a731043189 b
NERICA-L-19AM-22363 b2124611 b3085 b575921243285
NM-24609 a2614118 a2691 a556921243279
TOG5681AM-2399310769382681 a435 b74982486
NM-2401613543332674 b490 a74982489

Treat: treatment; AM: inoculated with AMF; NM: control (without AMF); Number associated to AM and NM indicates the year of trial (1: first year and 2: second year); HI: harvest index; 1000GWT: 1000 grain weight; GFD: grain filling duration; numb: number; DAS: days after sowing. In each column, means followed by different letters are significantly different (P≤0.05).

Fig 2

Mycorrhizal inoculation effect (MIE) for the 10 agronomic traits of each rice variety in both first (black line) and second (grey line) year trials.

Abbreviations associated to the variety names indicate the rice species (Os: O. sativa; Og: O. glaberrima) and ecotype (Upl: Upland, Irr: Irrigated, Rll: Rainfed lowland). HI: harvest index; 1000GWT: 1000 grain weight; GFD: grain filling duration. Stars indicate that the means of inoculated plants and non-inoculated plants were significantly different (P<0.05).

Mycorrhizal inoculation effect (MIE) for the 10 agronomic traits of each rice variety in both first (black line) and second (grey line) year trials.

Abbreviations associated to the variety names class="Species">indicate the class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice species (Os: O. sativa; Og: O. glaberrima) and ecotype (Upl: Upland, Irr: Irrigated, Rll: Rainfed lowland). HI: harvest index; 1000GWT: 1000 grain weight; GFD: grain filling duration. Stars indicate that the means of inoculated plants and non-inoculated plants were significantly different (P<0.05). Treat: treatment; AM: inoculated with class="Chemical">AMF; NM: control (without class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">AMF); Number associated to AM and NM indicates the year of trial (1: first year and 2: second year); HI: harvest index; 1000GWT: 1000 grain weight; GFD: grain filling duration; numb: number; DAS: days after sowing. In each column, means followed by different letters are significantly different (P≤0.05). For the aboveground biomass, there was a significant interaction between inoculation with class="Chemical">AMF and class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice variety (P = 0.002), while this interaction was independent of year of trial (S2 Table). NERICA 4 was the only rice variety whose aboveground biomass was significantly increased when inoculated with AMF in the first year trial (Table 3 and S3 Table). In contrast, the aboveground biomass was significantly decreased by the inoculation with AMF in Sahel 108 (Table 3 and S3 Table), with strong negative MIE (-0.52) in the second year trial (Fig 2). The analysis of the harvest index revealed a significant interaction between inoculation with class="Chemical">AMF and class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice variety (P = 0.000), which itself depended on year of trial (P = 0.048 for AMF x variety x year interaction, S2 Table). Therefore, significant differences in harvest index between the inoculated and non-inoculated plants were obtained in 3 varieties (NERICA 4, WAB56-104, and IR64) and 2 varieties (Sahel 108 and NERICA-L-19) in the first and second year trial, respectively (Table 3 and S3 Table). These varieties, except NERICA-L-19, displayed positive MIE ranging from 0.72 in NERICA 4 to 0.15 in IR64 (Fig 2). For tillers number, ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between inoculation with class="Chemical">AMF and class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice variety (P = 0.032), which itself depended on year of trial (P = 0.011 for AMF x variety x year interaction, S2 Table). Hence, significant positive effects of inoculation with AMF were recorded in 2 varieties (Sahel 202 and CG14), whereas 2 other varieties (Sahel 108 and TOG5681) displayed significant negative effects of inoculation with AMF in the second year trial (Fig 2, Table 3). ANOVA for spikelet fertility revealed that the effect of inoculation with class="Chemical">AMF was significantly declass="Chemical">pendent on class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice variety (P = 0.000 for AMF x variety interaction, S2 Table). Of the 8 rice varieties, O. glaberrima CG14 (first year trial), and NERICA 4 and Sahel108 (second year trial) showed significant increase in spikelet fertility when inoculated with AMF (Table 3 and S3 Table), with the highest MIE (0.657) recorded in NERICA 4 (Fig 2).

Mycorrhizal response profiling of the 8 rice varieties according to their ecotypes

ANOVA revealed that the effect of inoculation with class="Chemical">AMF was significantly declass="Chemical">pendent on class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice ecotype for grain yield (P = 0.002 for AMF x ecotype interaction), harvest index (P = 0.005 for AMF x ecotype interaction), and spikelet fertility (P = 0.037 for AMF x ecotype interaction). In addition, the AMF x ecotype interaction for the different agronomic traits was independent of year of trial (S4 Table). Indeed, only upland varieties showed significant positive effects of inoculation with AMF for these 3 agronomic traits in both first and second year trials (S5 Table). Fig 3 showed how MIE for each agronomic trait varied among the rice ecotypes, with MIE values ranging from strong positive in upland varieties to strong negative in rainfed lowland varieties particularly for yield, harvest index and spikelet fertility.
Fig 3

Matrix plot depicting the response to inoculation with AMF (MIE) of rice at variety and ecotype levels.

HI: harvest index; 1000GWT: 1000 grain weight; GFD: grain filling duration. Numbers associated to the variety names (NE: NERICA; W: WAB; Sah: Sahel; TO: TOG) indicate the year of trial (1: first year and 2: second year).

Matrix plot depicting the response to inoculation with AMF (MIE) of rice at variety and ecotype levels.

HI: harvest index; 1000GWT: 1000 grain weight; GFD: grain filling duration. Numbers associated to the variety names (NE: NERICA; W: WAB; Sah: Sahel; TO: TOG) pan class="Species">indicate the year of trial (1: first year and 2: second year). A two-dimensional NMDS ordination plot comparing the ecotype responses to inoculation with class="Chemical">AMF for yield, harvest index and sclass="Chemical">pikelet fertility in both first and second year trials is shown in Fig 4. The NMDS class="Chemical">plot which class="Chemical">presented small stress value (0.043), clearly seclass="Chemical">parated the uclass="Chemical">pland varieties from the irriclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">gated and lowland varieties with a partial overlap for these latter ecotypes. Similarity percentages (SIMPER) analysis on the basis of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities revealed 0.899, 0.627 and 0.556 of average dissimilarity for upland vs rainfed lowland, upland vs irrigated, and irrigated vs rainfed lowland, respectively. SIMPER also indicated that yield and harvest index were responsible for more than 80% of the differences recorded between ecotypes in terms of response to inoculation with AMF (Table 4).
Fig 4

NMDS representation of the rice ecotypes based on the Bray-Curtis similarity measure of their response to inoculation with AMF (MIE) for yield, harvest index and spikelet fertility.

Abbreviations Upl, Irr and Rll indicate the upland, irrigated and rainfed lowland rice ecotypes, respectively. To reduce the stress value, a three-dimensional ordination space was chosen of which two coordinates are shown.

Table 4

Contribution of agronomic traits to the differences recorded in response to inoculation with AMF (MIE) of rice ecotypes in both first and second year trials, revealed by Similarity percentage (SIMPER).

Upland vs Rainfed lowlandUpland vs IrrigatedIrrigated vs Rainfed lowland
Agro. traitsAver. dissim.Contrib. %Cumul. %Aver. dissim.Contrib. %Cumul. %Aver. dissim.Contrib. %Cumul. %
YLD0.45350.3450.340.26041.4741.470.27950.1850.18
HI0.30834.2784.610.25039.8781.340.20937.5987.77
FRT0.13815.391000.11718.661000.06812.23100
Overall0.8990.6270.556

Agro.: agronomic; Aver. dissim.: average dissimilarity; Contrib.: contribution; Cumul.: cumulative; YLD: yield; HI: harvest index; FRT: fertility.

NMDS representation of the rice ecotypes based on the Bray-Curtis similarity measure of their response to inoculation with AMF (MIE) for yield, harvest index and spikelet fertility.

Abbreviations Upl, Irr and Rll class="Species">indicate the uclass="Chemical">pland, irriclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">gated and rainfed lowland rice ecotypes, respectively. To reduce the stress value, a three-dimensional ordination space was chosen of which two coordinates are shown. Agro.: agronomic; Aver. dissim.: average dissimilarity; Contrib.: contribution; Cumul.: cumulative; YLD: yield; HI: harvest index; FRT: fertility.

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the impact of inoculation with beneficial soil microorclass="Species">ganisms on class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice growth and yield in controlled and field conditions over two years. Our results revealed a positive response of the irrigated rice variety Sahel 202 to inoculation with simple and mixed microbial inoculants in pot experiments. Indeed, significant improvement of growth and panicle weight as well as earliness of heading and maturity, were noticed in plants inoculated with one or the two AMF strains alone or in combination with PGPB strains. On the other hand, significant effects of simple and mixed PGPB inoculants were only observed on plant height. These results suggest that plant response to inoculation is related to the composition and diversity of microbial communities [43]. This hypothesis is partially supported by the finding that the beneficial effects of single AMF inoculation on plant growth can result from different mechanisms [44], reflecting some functional diversity among AM fungi. For instance, the capabilities for nutrient (especially phosphate) acquisition through enzyme activities and/or extra-radical mycelia that act as an extension of the host root system differ substantially among AMF [11]. As nutrients in the soil have a patchy distribution [45-46], co-occurrence of different strains in the same root system can lead to a "functional complementarity" in the fungal exploration of nutrient niches surrounding the roots [46-47]. Accordingly, although there was no significant difference in frequency of colonization and percentage of root length colonized by G. aggregatum and R. irregularis alone and in combination, plants inoculated with a combination of both AMF showed earlier heading and maturity compared to that inoculated with only one AMF. This indicates that the effect of plant inoculation with AMF on some rice agronomic traits is not directly linked to the degree of root colonization by AMF. One of the most interesting phenotypes we observed in response to class="Chemical">AMF inoculation in class="Chemical">pots exclass="Chemical">periments was a shortening of the time to flowering and maturity. For most class="Chemical">plant sclass="Chemical">pecies, in the absence of class="Chemical">phenological events, flowering occurs after the class="Chemical">plant reaches a fit vegetative develoclass="Chemical">pment [48-49]. Hence, imclass="Chemical">proving nutrition by class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">AMF would have caused the shortening of the vegetative phase as reported in tomato and Abutilon theophrasti [50-51]. Shortening the development cycle without adverse effects on yield would save inputs, limit the exposure of crops to climate instabilities and give more flexibility to the timing of cropping calendars. We therefore tested whether this was translatable to field conditions with 8 class="Species">rice varieties corresclass="Chemical">ponding to different sclass="Chemical">pecies (four class="Chemical">pan class="Species">O. sativa, two O. glaberrima and two interspecific NERICA) and ecotypes (upland, irrigated and rainfed lowland). Significant impacts of inoculation with AMF on agronomic traits were observed in all rice varieties. All analyzed agronomic traits, except grain filling duration, were significantly increased in at least one rice variety. Our results clearly show that rice response to AMF inoculation under irrigated field conditions depends on varieties. Importantly, the effects of AMF inoculation on O. sativa Sahel 202 were very different in pot and field experiments thus demonstrating the need to analyze the impact of AMF inoculants in field conditions. This discrepancy might be due to the impact of anoxic conditions due to flooding in field on the survival and function of AM symbiosis. Interestingly, we observed that plant response to class="Chemical">AMF inoculation is in large class="Chemical">part related to the class="Chemical">plant ecotyclass="Chemical">pe. Uclass="Chemical">pland varieties tended to resclass="Chemical">pond class="Chemical">positively to class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">AMF inoculation in contrast to rainfed lowland and irrigated varieties in both trials. It has been documented that the interaction between AMF and its host plant can range functionally along a parasitism mutualism continuum depending on soil resources and plant species, and in particular on root morphology and architecture [52-53]. Indeed, mycorrhizal dependency is often high in plants with thick and poorly branched roots and low in plants with thin and highly branched roots [11, 52]. In our study, root morphology and architecture of the different rice varieties were not analyzed. However, it has been suggested that O. sativa Indica types (Group 1, mostly lowland) have thin, highly branched roots, while tropical Japonica types (Group 6, which include upland Asian and temperate cultivars) have thick, less-branched long roots [54]. As a consequence, tropical Japonica types would display higher mycorrhizal responsiveness than the Indica types. Accordingly, upland rice varieties including the Japonica WAB 56–104 displayed strong positive MIE for most of the analyzed agronomic traits, whereas Indica types (IR64, Sahel 202 and Sahel 108; irrigated) displayed moderate positive or negative MIE. Furthermore, the interspecific variety NERICA 4 (upland) has O. sativa japonica and O. glaberrima parents (Table 1) and displayed strong positive MIE. On the other hand, the NERICA-L-19 variety (lowland) has O. sativa indica and O. glaberrima parents, showed strong negative MIE. This suggests that the differences observed in the mycorrhizal responsiveness of the 8 rice varieties cultivated under irrigated field conditions might be linked to root morphology and architecture regarding the ecotype, although other explanations may account for these features. Altogether, the results of this study reveal ecotype-specific responses to class="Chemical">AMF inoculation which could be an imclass="Chemical">portant tool to imclass="Chemical">prove class="Chemical">pan class="Species">rice yields and resilience in Africa and in particular for upland rice production systems that have the greatest potential for growth. Future studies will focus on the identification of optimal inoculum combinations as well as rice genome regions that control the establishment of symbiotic associations between AMF and rice.

Height of non-inoculated and inoculated plants of O. sativa Sahel 202.

A single microbial strain (class="Chemical">AMF or PGPR, A), two strains (B), and 3 and 4 strains (C), were used in the 1st year (A1, B1 and C1) and 2nd year (A2, B2 and C2) trials. Ri: class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Rhizophagus irregularis; Ga: Glomus aggregatum; ORS 278: Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS 278; and ORS 3454: Leifsonia sp. ORS 3454. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Collar section growth curves of non-inoculated and inoculated plants of O. sativa Sahel 202.

A single microbial strain (class="Chemical">AMF or PGPR, D1 and D2), two strains (E1 and E2), and 3 and 4 strains (F1 and F2), were used in the 1st year (D1, E1 and F1) and 2nd year (D2, E2 and F2) trials. Ri: class="Chemical">pan class="Species">Rhizophagus irregularis; Ga: Glomus aggregatum; ORS 278: Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS 278; and ORS 3454: Leifsonia sp. ORS 3454. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Root length and frequency of colonization of inoculated plants of O. sativa var. Sahel 202 for the 1st and 2nd-year trials.

In each column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P≤0.05. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

ANOVA for the ln (x +10) transformed values of agronomic traits in rice plants at variety level.

pan class="Chemical">AMF inoculation (inoculated and non-inoculated), variety (each of the 8 varieties tested) and year (1st and 2nd-year trial). (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Student’s t-test for the ln (x +10) transformed values of agronomic traits in rice plants at variety level.

AM: inoculated with class="Chemical">AMF and NM: non-inoculated. Abbreviations associated to the variety names class="Chemical">pan class="Species">indicate the rice ecotype (Upl: Upland, Irr: Irrigated, Rll: Rainfed lowland). (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

ANOVA for the ln (x +10) transformed values of agronomic traits in rice plants at ecotype level.

pan class="Chemical">AMF inoculation (inoculated and non-inoculated), ecotyclass="Chemical">pe (uclass="Chemical">pland, irriclass="Chemical">pan class="Species">gated and rainfed lowland) and year (1st and 2nd-year trial). (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Student’s t-test for the ln (x +10) transformed values of agronomic traits in rice plants at ecotype level.

AM: inoculated with pan class="Chemical">AMF and NM: non-inoculated. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Photosynthetic bradyrhizobia are natural endophytes of the African wild rice Oryza breviligulata.

Authors:  C Chaintreuil; E Giraud; Y Prin; J Lorquin; A Bâ; M Gillis; P de Lajudie; B Dreyfus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Microbial enhancement of crop resource use efficiency.

Authors:  Ian C Dodd; Juan Manuel Ruiz-Lozano
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 3.  Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth.

Authors:  Veronica Artursson; Roger D Finlay; Janet K Jansson
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 4.  Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: from microorganism capacities to crop production.

Authors:  F Pérez-Montaño; C Alías-Villegas; R A Bellogín; P del Cerro; M R Espuny; I Jiménez-Guerrero; F J López-Baena; F J Ollero; T Cubo
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 5.415

Review 5.  Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses.

Authors:  Martin Parniske
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 6.  Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture.

Authors:  P N Bhattacharyya; D K Jha
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Biochemical and genomic comparison of inorganic phosphate solubilization in Pseudomonas species.

Authors:  Simon H Miller; Patrick Browne; Claire Prigent-Combaret; Emeline Combes-Meynet; John P Morrissey; Fergal O'Gara
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.541

8.  Simultaneous interaction of Arabidopsis thaliana with Bradyrhizobium Sp. strain ORS278 and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 leads to complex transcriptome changes.

Authors:  Fabienne Cartieaux; Céline Contesto; Adrien Gallou; Guilhem Desbrosses; Joachim Kopka; Ludivine Taconnat; Jean-Pierre Renou; Bruno Touraine
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 9.  Productivity improvements in rice.

Authors:  Gurdv Khush
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.110

10.  The roots of future rice harvests.

Authors:  Nourollah Ahmadi; Alain Audebert; Malcolm J Bennett; Anthony Bishopp; Antonio Costa de Oliveira; Brigitte Courtois; Abdala Diedhiou; Anne Diévart; Pascal Gantet; Alain Ghesquière; Emmanuel Guiderdoni; Amelia Henry; Yoshiaki Inukai; Leon Kochian; Laurent Laplaze; Mikael Lucas; Doan Trung Luu; Baboucarr Manneh; Xiaorong Mo; Raveendran Muthurajan; Christophe Périn; Adam Price; Sabariappan Robin; Hervé Sentenac; Bassirou Sine; Yusaku Uga; Anne Aliénor Véry; Matthias Wissuwa; Ping Wu; Jian Xu
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.783

View more
  5 in total

1.  Successful Formulation and Application of Plant Growth-Promoting Kosakonia radicincitans in Maize Cultivation.

Authors:  Beatrice Berger; Sascha Patz; Silke Ruppel; Kristin Dietel; Sebastian Faetke; Helmut Junge; Matthias Becker
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Potential Role and Utilization of Plant Growth Promoting Microbes in Plant Tissue Culture.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Soumare; Abdala G Diédhiou; Naveen Kumar Arora; Laith Khalil Tawfeeq Al-Ani; Mariama Ngom; Saliou Fall; Mohamed Hafidi; Yedir Ouhdouch; Lamfeddal Kouisni; Mame Ourèye Sy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Variation in mycorrhizal growth response among a spring wheat mapping population shows potential to breed for symbiotic benefit.

Authors:  Tom J Thirkell; Mike Grimmer; Lucy James; Daria Pastok; Théa Allary; Ashleigh Elliott; Neil Paveley; Tim Daniell; Katie J Field
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.667

4.  Editorial: Interactions of Plants With Bacteria and Fungi: Molecular and Epigenetic Plasticity of the Host.

Authors:  Valentina Fiorilli; Marco Catoni; Luisa Lanfranco; Nicolae Radu Zabet
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  The genetic architecture of host response reveals the importance of arbuscular mycorrhizae to maize cultivation.

Authors:  M Rosario Ramírez-Flores; Sergio Perez-Limon; Meng Li; Benjamín Barrales-Gamez; Doris Albinsky; Uta Paszkowski; Víctor Olalde-Portugal; Ruairidh Jh Sawers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.