Literature DB >> 27906722

Location and Grade of Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Transperineal Template-guided Mapping Biopsy After Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy.

Nathan Bittner1, Gregory Merrick2,3, Al Taira4, Abbey Bennett2, Amy Schattel2, Wayne Butler2, Robert Galbreath2,5, Edward Adamovich6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the location and grade of prostate cancer diagnosed by transperineal template-guided mapping (TTMB) after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis consisted of 1118 consecutive patients who underwent TTMB from January 2005 to August 2015. Eight hundred thirty-five underwent TTMB after at least 1 negative TRUS biopsy and 283 underwent TTMB as the first biopsy procedure. The study population was divided into cohorts based on the number of prior TRUS biopsy sessions (0, 1, 2, and ≥3). No patient underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Differences in location and cancer grade detected on TTMB were evaluated as a function of the number of prior TRUS biopsies.
RESULTS: Of the 1118 patients, 679 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. This included 208, 325, 104, and 42 patients who underwent 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 prior TRUS biopsies. The incidence of cancer detection on TTMB decreased as the number of prior TRUS biopsies increased (73.5% vs. 62.4% vs. 51.7% vs. 37.2%, P<0.001); however, it became increasingly likely that TTMB would detect anterior prostate only as the number of prior TRUS biopsies increased (P=0.007). Moreover, the incidence of high grade cancer (Gleason score ≥7) in the anterior gland increased with the number of previous TRUS biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: TTMB detected prostate cancer in over half of the patients with one or more negative TRUS biopsies. The majority of TTMB detected cancers were Gleason score ≥7. As the number of prior TRUS biopsies increased, there was a commensurate increase in the proportion of high-grade, anterior only disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27906722     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  4 in total

1.  Incidence, grade and distribution of prostate cancer following transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Robert W Galbreath; Abbey Bennett; Wayne M Butler; Edward Amamovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Lori Long; Andrew R Wilbur; Patrick T Gomella; Sherif Mehralivand; Michael A Daneshvar; Nitin K Yerram; Luke P O'Connor; Alex Z Wang; Sandeep Gurram; Jonathan Bloom; M Minhaj Siddiqui; W Marston Linehan; Maria Merino; Peter L Choyke; Paul Pinsky; Howard Parnes; Joanna H Shih; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-10

3.  Utility of multiple core biopsies during transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy for patients with large prostates and PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chung Un Lee; Jae Hoon Chung; Wan Song; Minyong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Andrew R Wilbur; Sarah E Reese; Amir H Lebastchi; Sherif Mehralivand; Patrick T Gomella; Jonathan Bloom; Sandeep Gurram; Minhaj Siddiqui; Paul Pinsky; Howard Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria Merino; Peter L Choyke; Joanna H Shih; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.