| Literature DB >> 27906074 |
Lauren J Cator1, Zacharo Zanti2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several new mosquito control strategies will involve the release of laboratory reared males which will be required to compete with wild males for mates. Currently, the determinants of male mating success remain unclear. The presence of convergence between male and female harmonic flight tone frequencies during a mating attempt have been found to increase male mating success in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Size has also been implicated as a factor in male mating success. Here, we investigated the relationships among body size, harmonic convergence signalling, and mating success. We predicted that harmonic convergence would be an important determinant of mating success and that large individuals would be more likely to converge.Entities:
Keywords: Acoustics; Aedes aegypti; Body size; Fitness; Harmonic convergence; Mating success; Mosquito
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27906074 PMCID: PMC5133739 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1914-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1To look at the relative importance of harmonic convergence and body size we recorded interactions between live pairs of different body sizes. We examined direct effects of body size on copula formation (Solid Line a) and also whether body size indirectly affected the probability of copula formation by increasing harmonic convergence incidence (Dashed Lines b). Finally, we measured the direct effect of harmonic convergence on copula formation (Solid Line 4). To assess the effect of body size on harmonic convergence (Solid Line, c) we used playback experiments
Summary of playbacks. Details of origin and frequency of stimuli used in live recording and artificial playback experiments
| Live recording: female playbacks to males | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Low diet female |
| 2 | High diet female |
| 3 | Low diet female |
| 4 | High diet female |
| Live recording: male playback to females | |
| 1 | High diet male |
| 2 | Low diet male |
| 3 | High diet male |
| 4 | Low diet male |
| Artificial playbacks: fundamental tones played back to males (playback included this fundamental plus the next 3 harmonics) | |
| R1 | 400, 430, 460 Hz |
| R2 | 400, 430, 460, 480 Hz |
| R3 | 400, 430, 460, 480, 515, 550 Hz |
Convergence characteristics of males responding to artificial playbacks. Sample sizes for each calculation are indicated in parentheses. The variation in sample sizes is due to some males starting the interaction in convergence (no latency or rate calculation for these males). Mean and standard error are presented
| Convergence characteristic | Large males | Small males | All males |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range responded to | 400–550 (205) | 400–515 (189) | 400–550 (394) |
| AP frequency responded to (Hz) | 437.98 ± 2.15 (205) | 438.15 ± 2.10 (189) | 438.06 ± 1.50 (394) |
| Rate (Hz/s) | 12.82 ± 2.58 (68) | 10.75 ± 1.67 (73) | 11.75 ± 1.50 (141) |
| Duration (s) | 6.18 ± 0.26 (109) | 5.65 ± 0.28 (104) | 5.92 ± 0.19 (213) |
| Latency (s) | 3.27 ± 0.24 (68) | 3.55 ± 0.27 (73) | 3.41 ± 0.18 (141) |
Abbreviations: AP artificial playback, Hz Hertz, s seconds
Fig. 2The effect of playback frequency on proportion of males converging. Proportion of males responding to artificial playbacks peaked at 480 Hz. Error bars represent ± 2 standard errors (SE)
Convergence characteristics for male-female pairs from different treatments. F/M column contains the size of the female (large or small)/and size of the male (large or small) in the interaction. Male and female Δ refer to the amount of frequency change (Hz) recorded at the beginning and end of an interaction. These data are from the 109 live pairs in which convergence occurred
| Male and female size |
| Male Δ (Hz) | Female Δ (Hz) | Latency (s) | Duration (s) | Male rate (Hz/s) | Female rate (Hz/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFLM | 38 | 63.82 ± 10.30 | 23.53 ± 5.73 | 1.71 ± 0.36 | 1.70 ± 0.23 | 73.63 ± 18.29 | 20.73 ± 5.21 |
| LFSM | 34 | 72.37 ± 11.50 | 14.72 ± 2.37 | 1.74 ± 0.29 | 1.11 ± 0.22 | 69.02 ± 14.44 | 24.09 ± 6.45 |
| SFLM | 18 | 39.40 ± 8.41 | 34.87 ± 7.06 | 1.00 ± 0.30 | 1.29 ± 0.28 | 75.50 ± 18.22 | 39.80 ± 7.42 |
| SFSM | 19 | 59.30 ± 15.81 | 16.65 ± 3.89 | 1.11 ± 0.37 | 1.70 ± 0.47 | 93.08 ± 21.92 | 23.84 ± 7.42 |
Abbreviations: LFLM large female-large male pair, LFSM large female-small male pair, SFLM small female-large male pair, SFSM small female-small male pair
Fig. 3The effect of body size and harmonic convergence in copula formation. a Across all body size treatments the presence of a harmonic convergence event was a significant predictor of copula formation. b Proportion of mating interactions resulting in a successful copula formation between pairs of different body sizes. Error bars represent ± 2 standard errors (SE)
Fig. 4The effect of harmonic convergence across body size combinations. Proportion of copulas formed by converging (blue, square) and non-converging (red, circle) of different body sizes in live pair interactions. (n = 266 pairs). a Copulas involving small females. The presence of a convergence event increased the probability of copula formation for males of both body sizes. (n = 117 pairs). b Copulas involving large females. An interaction between male size and presence of harmonic convergence increased the likelihood of male mating success when approaching large females (n = 149 pairs). Error bars represent ± 2 standard errors (SE)