Patrik Arvidsson1,2, Mats Granlund1,3. 1. CHILD and Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden. 2. Centre for Research & Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden. 3. Department of Special Education, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study explored the relationship between intelligence quotient (IQ) and aspects of everyday functioning/participation in individuals (age 16-40) who have a mild/borderline intellectual disability (IQ 55-85). METHOD: Correlations were examined between IQ and (i) self-rated (n = 72) ability, participation as performance (how often an activity is performed), important participation restriction (not/seldom performing an activity perceived as important) and general well-being and (ii) proxy-rated (n = 41) ability and participation as performance. RESULTS: No significant correlations between IQ and any of the explored measures were found. However, the effect sizes of the correlations between IQ and ability were considered as small but not negligible. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the notion that IQ is a poor predictor of general aspects of everyday functioning in persons with mild/borderline intellectual disability. The result indicates that self-ratings partly generate other information than proxy ratings which may be important for assessments of supportive requirements and diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: This study explored the relationship between intelligence quotient (IQ) and aspects of everyday functioning/participation in individuals (age 16-40) who have a mild/borderline intellectual disability (IQ 55-85). METHOD: Correlations were examined between IQ and (i) self-rated (n = 72) ability, participation as performance (how often an activity is performed), important participation restriction (not/seldom performing an activity perceived as important) and general well-being and (ii) proxy-rated (n = 41) ability and participation as performance. RESULTS: No significant correlations between IQ and any of the explored measures were found. However, the effect sizes of the correlations between IQ and ability were considered as small but not negligible. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the notion that IQ is a poor predictor of general aspects of everyday functioning in persons with mild/borderline intellectual disability. The result indicates that self-ratings partly generate other information than proxy ratings which may be important for assessments of supportive requirements and diagnosis.
Keywords:
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; everyday functioning; intellectual disability; intelligence quotient; participation
Authors: David A A Gast; Gabriela L C de Wit; Amber van Hoof; Jeanne H M de Vries; Bert van Hemert; Robert Didden; Erik J Giltay Journal: J Appl Res Intellect Disabil Date: 2021-10-26