| Literature DB >> 27905514 |
Gema Hernán1, Laura Ramajo2,3,4, Lorena Basso2,5, Antonio Delgado6, Jorge Terrados1, Carlos M Duarte2,7, Fiona Tomas1,8.
Abstract
Under future increased CO2 concentrations, seagrasses are predicted to perform better as a result of increased photosynthesis, but the effects inEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27905514 PMCID: PMC5131316 DOI: 10.1038/srep38017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mean, standard error and results of repeated measures ANOVA in photosynthetic parameters and Tukey HSD test (H: HighCO2, C: Control CO2, 60: 60 days 90: 90 days, n = 7).
| Variable | Control CO2 | High CO2 | Source | DF | DFerror | MS | MSerror | F | P | Tukey’s tests | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 days | 90days | 60 days | 90days | |||||||||
| Maximum Quantum Yield | 0.708 (0.012) | 0.682 (0.179) | 0.712 (0.008) | 0.705 (0.008) | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.10 | 0.314 | |
| Time | 1 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 0.157 | ||||||
| Time x CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.406 | ||||||
| Alfa | 0.179 (0.007) | 0.144 (0.009) | 0.186 (0.006) | 0.15 (0.008) | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.452 | |
| Time | 1 | 12 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 27.32 | 90 < 60 | ||||||
| Time x CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.899 | ||||||
| Maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax) | 12.15 (0.92) | 9.11 (0.462) | 16.73 (0.99) | 9.11 (0.419) | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 36.66 | 3.69 | 9.93 | C < H | |
| Time | 1 | 12 | 198.68 | 4.11 | 48.31 | 90 < 60 | ||||||
| Time x CO2 | 1 | 12 | 36.60 | 4.11 | 8.90 | C90 = H90 < C60 < H60 | ||||||
| Saturation Irradiance (Ek) | 68.35 (4.68) | 64.34 (3.56 | 90.65 (5.9) | 62.91 (3.03) | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 762.10 | 197.00 | 3.87 | 0.0728 | |
| Time | 1 | 12 | 1764.60 | 79.40 | 22.23 | 90 < 60 | ||||||
| Time x CO2 | 1 | 12 | 985.70 | 79.40 | 12.41 | C90 = H90 < C60 < H60 | ||||||
Figure 1Leaf width (a), maximum leaf length (b), root length (c), number of roots (d), and number of leaves (e) measured in seedlings growing under high CO2 (black) or control (grey) conditions, at the beginning of the experiment and after 25,60 and 90 days. Total root length (c) was only measured at the beginning and after 90 days of experiment. Error bars indicate standard error. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences between treatments.
Results of Repeated Measures ANOVA in morphometric parameters, and Tukey HSD test (H: HighCO2; C: Control CO2; 0: beginning experiment; 25: 25 days; 60: 60 days; 90: 90 days, n = 7).
| Variable | Source | DF | DFerror | MS | MSerror | F | P | Tukey’s tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf Width | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.733 | |
| Time | 3 | 36 | 0.219 | 0 | 514.37 | 0 < 25 < 60 < 90 | ||
| Time x CO2 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 0.909 | ||
| Maximum Leaf Length | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0.034 | 0.333 | 0.1 | 0.754 | |
| Time | 3 | 36 | 51.38 | 0.1 | 525.88 | 0 < 25 < 60 < 90 | ||
| Time x CO2 | 3 | 36 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.54 | 0.661 | ||
| Number of Leaves | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 4.153 | 0.31 | 13.4 | C60 < H60 | |
| Time | 3 | 36 | 23.39 | 0.126 | 184.99 | 0 < 25 < 60 < 90 | ||
| Time x CO2 | 3 | 36 | 0.426 | 0.126 | 3.29 | C60 < H60 | ||
| Number of Roots | CO2 | 1 | 12 | 0.001 | 0.055 | 0.02 | 0.923 | |
| Time | 3 | 36 | 17.31 | 0.029 | 602.5 | 0 < 25 < 60 < 90 | ||
| Time x CO2 | 3 | 36 | 0.009 | 0.029 | 0.32 | 0.811 | ||
| Total Root Length | CO2 | 1 | 6 | 0.8 | 3.99 | 0.18 | 0.674 | |
| Time | 3 | 23 | 740.3 | 4.5 | 162.9 | 0 < 90 | ||
| Time x CO2 | 3 | 23 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 1.43 | 0.244 |
Figure 2Mean dry Biomass (g) of leaves, seeds and roots of seedlings growing under high CO2 (black) or control (grey) conditions.
Error bars indicate standard error. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences between treatments.
Results of one way ANOVAs in plant traits and Tukey HSD test (I: Initial, H: HighCO2, C: Control CO2, n = 7).
| Tissue | Plant Traits | DF | DFerror | MS | MSerror | F | P | Tukey’s tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | C (%DW) | 2 | 17 | 2.115 | 0.235 | 8.995 | I < H = C | |
| N (%DW) | 2 | 17 | 0.218 | 0.023 | 9.591 | I = H < C | ||
| C/N | 2 | 17 | 12.09 | 1.37 | 8.824 | C < H = I | ||
| Sucrose (%DW) | 1 | 12 | 9.072 | 0.848 | 10.7 | C < H | ||
| Fiber (%DW) | 1 | 12 | 0.582 | 3.306 | 0.18 | 0.682 | ||
| Thickness (cm) | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.031 | 0.863 | ||
| Biomass (g) | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.27 | 0.768 | ||
| δ13 C | 1 | 12 | 59.49 | 1.047 | 56.83 | H < C | ||
| Seed | C (%DW) | 2 | 17 | 2.285 | 0.264 | 8.673 | I = C < H | |
| N (%DW) | 2 | 17 | 0.569 | 0.072 | 7.875 | H = C < I | ||
| C/N | 2 | 17 | 49.24 | 5.22 | 9.429 | I < C = H | ||
| Sucrose (%DW) | 1 | 12 | 40.42 | 5.83 | 6.94 | C < H | ||
| Starch (%DW) | 1 | 12 | 0.682 | 1.711 | 0.398 | 0.54 | ||
| Biomass (g) | 2 | 12 | 0.015 | 0.02 | 6.837 | C < H | ||
| Root | C (%DW) | 2 | 17 | 14.71 | 0.24 | 61.19 | I < H = C | |
| N (%DW) | 2 | 17 | 0.25 | 0.028 | 8.957 | I < H = C | ||
| C/N | 2 | 17 | 17.034 | 3.975 | 4.286 | H = C < I | ||
| Sucrose (%DW) | 1 | 12 | 3.324 | 0.626 | 5.31 | C < H | ||
| Starch (%DW) | 1 | 12 | 0.214 | 0.388 | 0.55 | 0.472 | ||
| Biomass (g) | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0.794 | 0.474 |
Figure 3Percentage of dry weight in Nitrogen (N), Carbon (C), and Carbon Nitrogen ratio (C/N), in leaves (a), seeds (b) and roots (c) of seedlings at the beginning of the experiment (white) or after growing under high CO2 (black) or control (grey) conditions. Error bars indicate standard error and different letters indicate statistically significant differences across treatments (Tukey).
Figure 4Percentage of dry weight in sucrose, starch, total phenol content (Phenols), and fiber in leaves (a). seeds (b) and roots (c) of seedlings growing under high CO2 (black) or control (grey) conditions. Error bars indicate standard error. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences between treatments.
Figure 5Percentage of fresh weight consumed by herbivores from leaf tissue of seedlings growing under high CO2 (black) or control (grey) conditions.
Error bars indicate standard error. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences between treatments.